Analysis 2023 Preseason Games

Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,261
AFL Club
Sydney
#1
Figured a thread for these would make sense to avoid the commentary going all over the place!

Adelaide were kind enough to put up a replay of their intra-club game, so I've watched the first half, thoughts below:

General - Was a clear probables vs the rest setup, Blue team was basically their best 22, I'd say there's a couple of spots that are battles but it's pretty much the exact 22 I'd have picked.

Can be spun both ways but the Blue team really struggled to assert dominance over the yellow side. Glass half full says it's a great sign of the depth, half empty says it's a real concern of the lack of top end talent to really separate from mid-tier level. Results last year tend to suggest the latter is probably more accurate.

Also an interesting note was the last 5 mintues they turned into a match sim scenario where the yellow team was 9 points up and had to defend while the Blue tried to wrestle the win, the yellow team holding on fairly comfortably further supports the suggestion that they lack the talent to separate but it was interesting to watch.


Going through in numerical order...

Jones - Played wing for the 2nd team, was solid but did nothing to really change his status in the rest group.

Keays - Played a pure HF role until the 5 minute simulation where he went into the main midfield group. I don't know how to read that, basically the 5 minute simulation suggests that's the "game on the line" group and he was in it and yet no midfield time the rest of the game.

Berry - Their main midfielder in this game and looked great, except for his kicking which unfortunately didn't look improved at all. Tackling was great. Sneaky good option in DT formats, disposal will stunt him in SC, imo.

Murphy - Played for the magoos and didn't do anything to stand out in the half.

Crouch - Primary mid for the magoos also and like Murphy, did very little to shift that scenario. Was really disappointing to be honest and just looks done as a player.

Hately - Also in the twos main midfield group, he might have been even more underwhelming than the others...

TT/Fog/Tex - Will lump together, were the KPF group, Tex took F50 ruck, TT was the backup ruck, looked good together for the most part albeit didn't really dominate the defenders like you'd hope.

Rachele - Started in the first midfield group and was solid. Rotating with Rankine through that spot, they were the two who went out for Keays in the 5 minute drill which was interesting given you normally want the more explosive types in that situation. I think he's more of a draft format prospect right now but will watch very closely in the preseason games as it's a very lucrative role if he can stick it and actually produce from it. Not a lot of first group mids that aren't in the 90+ range across the AFL.

Sloane/Hinge - Played the wings for the blue side the entire first half, Sloane looked pretty good but role didn't look like it would harm any of the fantasy relevant guys. Hinge was solid, probably did enough to stay ahead of Jones and Sholl.

Pedlar - Played forward pocket, rookie option and was very solid for the most part. Adds a lot more hardness than the Murphy, McHenry or Rowe types they had going through that spot last year and thought it was a good tick. At a premium price and with that role, not a great SC option but definitely worth watching. Imagine he's an injury from more midfield minutes that could change that quickly.

Dawson - Absolutely everywhere across half back. He looks primed for another huge season. Took all the kick-ins until the 5 minute drill where Milera took a "nearest player" rush one away from him. Intercept marking, primary kicker. Basically ticked all the boxes if considering him.

Soligo - Played HF but the high HF extra midfielder role, was solid but unspectacular.

Hamill - Had the extra HB slot after the main guys, what he did was good but as usual very low quantity. I thought Parnell, obviously with more opportunity, definitely put his hand up for this spot from the yellow side, probably the 22nd picked right now, imo.

Taylor - Got very solid midfield minutes for the yellow side and, imo, was the best of the group. One to watch as a potential downgrade option later in the year I think.

Brown - Main midfield group for yellow, did nothing to change his status in the 2nds.

Rankine - Switching with Rachele, with Rachele getting the midfield balance. He was really solid, especially at the CB where his burst and movement were top notch, albeit not against a good midfield group that was trying very hard. Not sure what his goals in the 2nd half looked like but 2 in the first were "non-AFL" goals against a reserves side that ran out of puff late in the 2nd quarter, the kind of goal that you maybe kick one in a season. Still, he looked fit and firing and his effort was a lot better than the majority of GC. Him and Rachele might have a great role but it would probably be better if one of them had it instead of sharing. Still another strong draft option I dare say, not sure I can see 90+ from him to justify in the real stuff.

McAdam - Took the other forward slot in the Blue team, was solid but same old for him.

McHenry - Was in the yellow side, another who's played a fair bit of AFL but didn't seem to really want to earn a first's spot based on his effort levels.

Schoenberg - The 5th midfielder for the Blue side, started on the pine and was rotating through Berry and Laird when one was resting. Basically they had 2 of those 3 and one of Rankine/Rachele until Keays replaced the latter in the 5 minute drill. He was the worst of the group by a considerable margin and the one whose spot seems most at threat.

Murray/Doedee - Took the other two KPD slots, were solid.

Laird - Clearly another level to the rest of the midfielders/players out there. Players like him I'm looking for reasons to not pick them as we all know the positives. He looked fit, focused and firing and I honestly took nothing out of it that makes me want him any less. That's about as big a tick as I can give for an elite midfielder really.

Milera - Tough to gauge this one, role was good and he looks really fit but he didn't really stand out or get much pill. He looked the clear "3rd" (see Butts) option off half back and Dawson and Smith were clearly still the main guys. What he did was good but he looks destined for that Chapman type clear 3rd option role where you can have a few good games but also some stinkers. If he was 100k cheaper he'd be a lock but it's hard to see him going past 90 like he needs to, strikes me as a high 70 to mid 80 range unless there are injuries ahead of him. Will watch though as the class is clear and he genuinely looks fit for once.

Smith - Still the 2nd main rebounder and was prolific, played well.

Himmel - Clearly in the 2nds, versatility his strength as he wasn't terrible as a forward, ruck or defender but seems to be in that replacement position.

Borlase - Lump of a lad, held his own very well against the KPF, standout moment a great tackle against a Tex fend off that has ended so many young players' dreams. Was blowing hard several times and that looks like it will be his hill to climb before AFL but strength wise he looks ready.

Sholl - Manned the other wing for yellow, like Jones he didn't do anything to really advance his cause at all.

Butts - Not sure if it was because he didn't have a man or what but he seemed determined to be the main rebounder, his kicking should have ended that dream but he kept doing it. In the coverage it was mentioned they want him to add more rebound into his game but perhaps went a bit too far today. Was good to see him being active though but perhaps better served to being a target for the sideways release kick to then handball to the ball users instead of essentially doing the opposite.

ROB - I always find him so hard to review, he really is terrible in the ruck and today was no different, he had a couple of wins but mostly it looked like Strachan won the better of the ruck contests. He was excellent around the ground and was moving very well, tackled well and even pushed forward a few times to be an option, albeit missed the shots. Basically he's 100% reliant on his midfield doing a better job of roving to bad ruck work if he's going to push to the 110+ range, it's possible and Rankine and Rachele definitely add dynamism to the mix that could help that factor but that's a very fluky area of improvement to bank on. Still, he's a solid option right now in a bad field. At least durability hasn't been an issue for him likely basically everyone else.

Gollant - Played FF for the yellow, really starved of chances so hard to say much.

Strachan - As mentioned in ROB, I thought he outrucked ROB but he's not as good around the ground, albeit he's improved again and is closing that gap. Ultimately he's better than you want the backup ruck to be if you're picking the starter, the gap isn't much and would only take a few big reserves games and he could be in the mix. That neither can really pose as a forward and TT existing probably helps alleviate that but a ruck share is probably better than him just flat out replacing ROB if you've got him :LOL:

Keane - Was solid in defense, he might be the most Irish looking of all the Irish players, they all have that distinct style but he's like a bigger more prominent version of it. Could definitely step in if needed or wanted down back.
 
Joined
13 Jun 2022
Messages
5,228
Likes
17,245
AFL Club
St Kilda
#4
Joined
9 Feb 2014
Messages
910
Likes
2,591
AFL Club
North Melb.
#8
  • Xerri played well but a big risk to pick him with Goldy still looking ok and CCJ floating around (Worth some thought though).
  • Comben will get games but will score like a key forward. Took a few centre bounces today so some chance he ends up with DPP down the track if he stays on the park. If you a short a rookie forward he is your man
  • Cunners kicked 3 goals and to me looks to have a clear role that is 50/50 forward Mid. Wont kick 3 every week so he is a no for me.
  • Powell is one to watch. Was a gun fantasy junior and looks ready. Tough price to select him
  • Phillips – Just lock him in
  • Sheezel was great but not for me in SC (this year)
  • Curtis will have a great year and is definitely stronger and fitter but cant see him being a good SC selection
  • Luke McDonald has been in my team all year and took most of the kick outs for the blue team today. Stays in my team on that role
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,261
AFL Club
Sydney
#9
North put up the full match, have watched the first half and a few minutes of the 3rd.

General - Good hitout for them, intensity was very high. Thought it was going to go like the Crows game where it was surprisingly even but from Q2 the Blue (1sts) team got well on top and put it on the scoreboard.

Was a clear probables vs the rest setup, Blue team much stronger in almost all areas.

Lot of guys missing from this one and they've got a lot more position battles than the Crows, imo, so a lot harder to read into things.

Key guys missing include Shiels, Hall, Corr, Taylor, Thomas, Goater, Mahony, Wardlaw, Tucker and Archer, who either played last year a lot, have been talked about this year or recruited as mature agers.

Will go through in numerical order again.

Mahony - Wasn't playing, had a shoulder injury as the reason he missed. Not far off and could disrupt the small forward slots, albeit I have him outside the best 22.

Stephenson - Played his traditional HF role, still fumbles way too much and is his biggest issue. He was solid without dominating with strong supply levels.

Sheezel - Played HB for the half I watched, shifted forward for 2nd half and from reports played well there. I actually thought he was pretty good off HB, his kicking looks fluid but was a mess today, just seemed to one hop just about every kick. Patterns were solid and you could see senior players were happy to get him the ball. The HB spots are wide open for this team so would be a good spot to slide into, very lucrative fantasy role if he gets it.

Corr - Out with a calf, another who messes with trying to pick the best 22.

Taylor - Also out with a calf, another who is in the best 22 and messes with projecting things from this match.

Wardlaw - Shiels commentated for most of the 2nd quarter and was adding comments, said he's been out with soft tissue but working back and definitely a chance to play games once his body is good.

Ziebell - Took the first kick-in, there were only 3 and didn't take the others but he used his one much better than McDonald used his two. Role was rock solid, not as much sweeping without the ball as they shared that load more than 2 years ago but still getting on the end of it and looking solid. Did nothing to harm his selection criteria, imo but I'm not expecting the 105+ guy, mid 90s sounds more likely.

Scott - Pure wing role for the whole half, he played really well.

LDU - Pure midfield role, was solid if not a little understated. You'd really like to see him dominating the seconds a bit more and as a guy whose biggest issue has always been effort and commitment I'd have loved to see him want to dominate them rather than playing like a guy who knows he's getting picked. I really want him to demand selection because I rate him so highly, he definitely didn't do that.

Cunnington - Tend to agree with the "underwhelming" review that was floating. Started prime midfield in Q1 and was very prominent early and looked like Cunners, shifted forward later in Q1 and basically wasn't involved, spent the majority of the 2nd quarter forward and barely touched it despite it living in the forward half. North wont face a side as weak as their seconds so if he's playing forward at that rate it's going to be very hard to score consistently or well. For mine, it was a solid X at his price role wise in this game. As a pure mid he's a low 100s guy, in this role I see 80s as far more likely. On a positive note, he looks in great shape and was really good when on ball.

McDonald - Took a couple of kick-ins, played really solidly in defense. Don't see any reason to pick him but he's definitely a negative for Ziebell.

Simpkin - Started at HF, basically switched roles with Cunnington and pretty much scoring profiles as well. He pushed a lot higher as a HF than Cunnington did, who played more as a forward pocket, and was effectively the extra midfielder when at HF. Also lined up on a wing a couple of times (see Powell) and was solid without really doing anything special. Saw nothing to suggest his role or scoring will change substantially.

Tucker - Hurt his knee around Christmas and will be unlikely for round 1, the way Shiels talked about him it kind of sounded like he's a best 22 guy though so will be a scare for fringe selections.

Shiels - Gave great insight in the box, he spoke that he actually expects his own role will mostly be VFL and/or sub at AFL level and only expects to play if there's injuries, was interesting to hear but maybe not the threat most would have thought he was to more fantasy relevant names.

Howe - Played for the 2nds midfield. Hard to read as has been injured so might just be fitness, might also be fringe 22. Not sure.

Bonar - Started in the main defense, got put in 2nds for Q2, he played well for both units though.

Young - In the twos, didn't do much.

Greenwood - Was in the twos main midfield, tackled well and was generally combative without doing anything special. Switched with Cunners at HT. Not sure where he fits in but given his clearance work and ability to contribute as a forward, he seems a best 22 guy and he would get in the way of the fantasy relevant guys.

Logue - Opposite of Bonar, was just about best on in Q1 for the yellow, nowhere near as many chances in Q2 and didn't do much. Ran laps for 2nd half as he recovers from his finger injury. Intercepted well when he got the chance and looked solid.

Larkey - Was really impressive, albeit with overwhelming supply and not much opposition.

CCJ - Playing for the 2nds, he actually played well given the supply levels and that Goldy basically rucked the whole half. Switched on ball for the blue team at start of Q3, suggesting he's right in the mix, they've got an awkward decision looming there.

Goldy - Rucked for the yellows, basically him and Xerri went head to head and it was probably a lot closer than most would expect, he still looks really good, especially around the ground.

McKay - Was really solid, also a bit more intercept and rebound work than previously. It definitely felt like they wanted a more balanced rebound structure.

Powell - Started wing and played there until the last 10 or so of Q2 where he went to inside midfield. Very interesting price and the role was solid, I don't expect he gets the inside minutes but he played well enough to score very decently from the wing time, will be watching as he has an extremely natural fantasy game. Probably in that 75k too expensive group but watching.

Curtis - Just about best on for mine, was every where as a forward, pressure was great, so shifty and composed with the ball and even got some midfield burn late in Q2 and had an impact. Really rate him as a player, think he could be a sneaky good fantasy option but not relevant in classic.

Bergman - Was playing half back for the firsts, I expect he's first out for Hall but at 123k as a defender rookie his role and scoring potential were excellent. Would only consider if he's picked alongside Hall/Ziebell/McDonald come round one but I thought he was the best of the guys auditioning for the Blue side.

Turner - Played HF in a pretty good role. Not sure how they'll use him but he actually has scored well historically in that role, albeit it's been years. Probably a bit too expensive and the ceiling is too low but played well.

Phillips - Played excellently, role was very good, pretty much pure midfield, was the guy who switched out for Curtis late in Q2 (going forward) but otherwise seemed to rest via interchange to allow for maximum burst. Has always reminded me of Cunnington and nothing changed, just exceptional by hand and in clearances. If he can stay ahead of Shiels, Cunnington, Simpkin, Greenwood and Howe for midfield minutes he could be one of the best rookies we've seen, imo. I think he's a lock and on-field rookie unless basically all those guys push him out (Simpkin and Cunnington probably do somewhat, fwiw, but think he stays ahead of the rest), will see how they line up when squeezing everyone in for the preseason games but expect he stays as their M3/4 and should push 80s and score more reliably than most rookies do.

Comben - Probably the best on for the half for mine. Looks slimmer and bigger, if that makes sense, this year and was moving very freely. Reminds me a lot of Jarrad Waite with the number and way he moves and was just excellent. Went in as 2nd ruck for a burst, got thrashed by Goldy and I expect they'll play both Xerri and Goldy but he demanded a spot come round one for mine and was very impressive. He's a bench rookie type given role/positioning but that's perfect as we need those, definitely could kick a bag one day if they get good supply.

Goater - Didn't play, Shiels didn't mention him either so not the best sign.

Lazzaro - Playing for the twos wing/hf, he was pretty good, switched to Blue for Q3 suggesting he's fringe.

Spicer - FP for the twos, had a couple of nice moments but no supply.

Harvey - Real nugget, looks more like one of the 25 year old VFL top ups than a rookie, played midfield for the twos alongside Howe and Greenwood and was really solid. Tackled very well. Wouldn't surprise if he plays a bit this year but probably later on.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,261
AFL Club
Sydney
#10
Got 10,000ed... so it begins :LOL:

Xerri - Held his own against Goldy, which is genuinely impressive. He looked really good. He's the kind of guy I'll probably pick whenever Goldy retires and he gets an R1 gig, really rate him.

Perez - In the blue side and another rebounder, alongside Bergman I'd assume they're the two that go out for Corr/Bonar and Hall but he played well. Too many JS issues at his price.

Ford - Was fantastic as a small forward, so physical and just love how he played. I can't help but feel like he gets pushed out by Taylor, but another possible bench rookie if he doesn't. He's going to be really good. Ideally Taylor maybe plays wing this year and leaves a spot for him.

Drury - Was the primary rebounding defender for the yellow side and I was really impressed. I actually thought he played better than Bergman or Perez but that could mostly come down to opportunity. Didn't see him lose defensively or get exposed and they had a few crafty guys to work him and his rebound and composure was good. Another one to watch if he does make the side.

Zurhaar - Started in the main midfield group and was really solid, played a genuine midfield role rather than just taking a stoppage, although in Q2 that kind of flipped and did become more of a burst stoppage guy and then push forward. I didn't see anything to think he's fantasy relevant in the role, still not high possessions and relies too much on impact, but he looked good doing it and can see him laying a few more bruising tackles this year if the role sticks.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,261
AFL Club
Sydney
#12
In the second post but he looked really good to me, a lot of supply playing for the yellow team and I think showed plenty and has to be in the mix.

That said, really hard to see how any of Bergman, Perez, Goater and Drury actually fit in with Corr and Hall to come back in.

Feels like McDonald, Ziebell, Logue and McKay are 4 of 7, throw in Corr/Bonar and Hall and that's 6. So basically one spot available for all those guys, potentially Sheezel also (who probably gets the edge on potential/draft capital).

Drury played great though.
 
Joined
5 Jan 2019
Messages
490
Likes
1,132
AFL Club
Melbourne
#13
Figured a thread for these would make sense to avoid the commentary going all over the place!

Adelaide were kind enough to put up a replay of their intra-club game, so I've watched the first half, thoughts below:

General - Was a clear probables vs the rest setup, Blue team was basically their best 22, I'd say there's a couple of spots that are battles but it's pretty much the exact 22 I'd have picked.

Can be spun both ways but the Blue team really struggled to assert dominance over the yellow side. Glass half full says it's a great sign of the depth, half empty says it's a real concern of the lack of top end talent to really separate from mid-tier level. Results last year tend to suggest the latter is probably more accurate.

Also an interesting note was the last 5 mintues they turned into a match sim scenario where the yellow team was 9 points up and had to defend while the Blue tried to wrestle the win, the yellow team holding on fairly comfortably further supports the suggestion that they lack the talent to separate but it was interesting to watch.


Going through in numerical order...

Jones - Played wing for the 2nd team, was solid but did nothing to really change his status in the rest group.

Keays - Played a pure HF role until the 5 minute simulation where he went into the main midfield group. I don't know how to read that, basically the 5 minute simulation suggests that's the "game on the line" group and he was in it and yet no midfield time the rest of the game.

Berry - Their main midfielder in this game and looked great, except for his kicking which unfortunately didn't look improved at all. Tackling was great. Sneaky good option in DT formats, disposal will stunt him in SC, imo.

Murphy - Played for the magoos and didn't do anything to stand out in the half.

Crouch - Primary mid for the magoos also and like Murphy, did very little to shift that scenario. Was really disappointing to be honest and just looks done as a player.

Hately - Also in the twos main midfield group, he might have been even more underwhelming than the others...

TT/Fog/Tex - Will lump together, were the KPF group, Tex took F50 ruck, TT was the backup ruck, looked good together for the most part albeit didn't really dominate the defenders like you'd hope.

Rachele - Started in the first midfield group and was solid. Rotating with Rankine through that spot, they were the two who went out for Keays in the 5 minute drill which was interesting given you normally want the more explosive types in that situation. I think he's more of a draft format prospect right now but will watch very closely in the preseason games as it's a very lucrative role if he can stick it and actually produce from it. Not a lot of first group mids that aren't in the 90+ range across the AFL.

Sloane/Hinge - Played the wings for the blue side the entire first half, Sloane looked pretty good but role didn't look like it would harm any of the fantasy relevant guys. Hinge was solid, probably did enough to stay ahead of Jones and Sholl.

Pedlar - Played forward pocket, rookie option and was very solid for the most part. Adds a lot more hardness than the Murphy, McHenry or Rowe types they had going through that spot last year and thought it was a good tick. At a premium price and with that role, not a great SC option but definitely worth watching. Imagine he's an injury from more midfield minutes that could change that quickly.

Dawson - Absolutely everywhere across half back. He looks primed for another huge season. Took all the kick-ins until the 5 minute drill where Milera took a "nearest player" rush one away from him. Intercept marking, primary kicker. Basically ticked all the boxes if considering him.

Soligo - Played HF but the high HF extra midfielder role, was solid but unspectacular.

Hamill - Had the extra HB slot after the main guys, what he did was good but as usual very low quantity. I thought Parnell, obviously with more opportunity, definitely put his hand up for this spot from the yellow side, probably the 22nd picked right now, imo.

Taylor - Got very solid midfield minutes for the yellow side and, imo, was the best of the group. One to watch as a potential downgrade option later in the year I think.

Brown - Main midfield group for yellow, did nothing to change his status in the 2nds.

Rankine - Switching with Rachele, with Rachele getting the midfield balance. He was really solid, especially at the CB where his burst and movement were top notch, albeit not against a good midfield group that was trying very hard. Not sure what his goals in the 2nd half looked like but 2 in the first were "non-AFL" goals against a reserves side that ran out of puff late in the 2nd quarter, the kind of goal that you maybe kick one in a season. Still, he looked fit and firing and his effort was a lot better than the majority of GC. Him and Rachele might have a great role but it would probably be better if one of them had it instead of sharing. Still another strong draft option I dare say, not sure I can see 90+ from him to justify in the real stuff.

McAdam - Took the other forward slot in the Blue team, was solid but same old for him.

McHenry - Was in the yellow side, another who's played a fair bit of AFL but didn't seem to really want to earn a first's spot based on his effort levels.

Schoenberg - The 5th midfielder for the Blue side, started on the pine and was rotating through Berry and Laird when one was resting. Basically they had 2 of those 3 and one of Rankine/Rachele until Keays replaced the latter in the 5 minute drill. He was the worst of the group by a considerable margin and the one whose spot seems most at threat.

Murray/Doedee - Took the other two KPD slots, were solid.

Laird - Clearly another level to the rest of the midfielders/players out there. Players like him I'm looking for reasons to not pick them as we all know the positives. He looked fit, focused and firing and I honestly took nothing out of it that makes me want him any less. That's about as big a tick as I can give for an elite midfielder really.

Milera - Tough to gauge this one, role was good and he looks really fit but he didn't really stand out or get much pill. He looked the clear "3rd" (see Butts) option off half back and Dawson and Smith were clearly still the main guys. What he did was good but he looks destined for that Chapman type clear 3rd option role where you can have a few good games but also some stinkers. If he was 100k cheaper he'd be a lock but it's hard to see him going past 90 like he needs to, strikes me as a high 70 to mid 80 range unless there are injuries ahead of him. Will watch though as the class is clear and he genuinely looks fit for once.

Smith - Still the 2nd main rebounder and was prolific, played well.

Himmel - Clearly in the 2nds, versatility his strength as he wasn't terrible as a forward, ruck or defender but seems to be in that replacement position.

Borlase - Lump of a lad, held his own very well against the KPF, standout moment a great tackle against a Tex fend off that has ended so many young players' dreams. Was blowing hard several times and that looks like it will be his hill to climb before AFL but strength wise he looks ready.

Sholl - Manned the other wing for yellow, like Jones he didn't do anything to really advance his cause at all.

Butts - Not sure if it was because he didn't have a man or what but he seemed determined to be the main rebounder, his kicking should have ended that dream but he kept doing it. In the coverage it was mentioned they want him to add more rebound into his game but perhaps went a bit too far today. Was good to see him being active though but perhaps better served to being a target for the sideways release kick to then handball to the ball users instead of essentially doing the opposite.

ROB - I always find him so hard to review, he really is terrible in the ruck and today was no different, he had a couple of wins but mostly it looked like Strachan won the better of the ruck contests. He was excellent around the ground and was moving very well, tackled well and even pushed forward a few times to be an option, albeit missed the shots. Basically he's 100% reliant on his midfield doing a better job of roving to bad ruck work if he's going to push to the 110+ range, it's possible and Rankine and Rachele definitely add dynamism to the mix that could help that factor but that's a very fluky area of improvement to bank on. Still, he's a solid option right now in a bad field. At least durability hasn't been an issue for him likely basically everyone else.

Gollant - Played FF for the yellow, really starved of chances so hard to say much.

Strachan - As mentioned in ROB, I thought he outrucked ROB but he's not as good around the ground, albeit he's improved again and is closing that gap. Ultimately he's better than you want the backup ruck to be if you're picking the starter, the gap isn't much and would only take a few big reserves games and he could be in the mix. That neither can really pose as a forward and TT existing probably helps alleviate that but a ruck share is probably better than him just flat out replacing ROB if you've got him :LOL:

Keane - Was solid in defense, he might be the most Irish looking of all the Irish players, they all have that distinct style but he's like a bigger more prominent version of it. Could definitely step in if needed or wanted down back.
outstanding review kudos
 
Joined
18 Sep 2012
Messages
3,404
Likes
7,197
AFL Club
Essendon
#14
Cunnington - Tend to agree with the "underwhelming" review that was floating. Started prime midfield in Q1 and was very prominent early and looked like Cunners, shifted forward later in Q1 and basically wasn't involved, spent the majority of the 2nd quarter forward and barely touched it despite it living in the forward half. North wont face a side as weak as their seconds so if he's playing forward at that rate it's going to be very hard to score consistently or well. For mine, it was a solid X at his price role wise in this game. As a pure mid he's a low 100s guy, in this role I see 80s as far more likely. On a positive note, he looks in great shape and was really good when on ball.
Underwhelming game, but finished with 21 disposals, 6 clearances, 8 tackles, 3 goals and 2 score assists. If he can produce those numbers in an underwhelming performance then sign me up.
 
Joined
13 Apr 2012
Messages
6,024
Likes
15,759
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#15
Underwhelming game, but finished with 21 disposals, 6 clearances, 8 tackles, 3 goals and 2 score assists. If he can produce those numbers in an underwhelming performance then sign me up.
Good exercise in temperance as we remember what his opposition was. No disrespect to NM but their B side isn’t something I would equate to stiff opposition.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,697
Likes
30,160
AFL Club
Sydney
#16
Underwhelming game, but finished with 21 disposals, 6 clearances, 8 tackles, 3 goals and 2 score assists. If he can produce those numbers in an underwhelming performance then sign me up.
Tough crowd - well worth listening to the podcast series from Coaches Panel - best ones I've listened to in a long time - last thing I heard from them tonight driving home was "use your own eyes" which is a great piece of advice. We all see things differently as some narratives are made to justify a selection or non-selection through a bias judgement - which is only human and sometimes sub-consciously.
 
Last edited:
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,261
AFL Club
Sydney
#19
Underwhelming game, but finished with 21 disposals, 6 clearances, 8 tackles, 3 goals and 2 score assists. If he can produce those numbers in an underwhelming performance then sign me up.
I only watched the first half, he switched to the 2nds team in the 2nd half and probably played pretty pure midfield from that point (they also balanced the teams out considerably at that point). I'd hazard to guess that he had about a third of those stats in the first half but would love to see the breakdown.

It's not that he was bad by any means but I didn't like the role at all and didn't think he did anything to demand picking him. Will definitely be watching the preseason games as he's been on my radar since things opened and he had FWD status but if he plays that role again I'm not sure there's any stats that could change my mind. He's had 4 out of 13 seasons that he's scored at a passing grade, 1 was outstanding and 1 was very good with two reluctant pass marks. At the end of the day 9 out of 13, coming back from what he had on the wrong side of 30 with several emerging young players at his position is a pick that I want to see some really strong boxes ticked.

The 2nd half may very well have been huge, I didn't watch it. He may also have put up much better stats than the eye test in the first half but I can only write what I saw :)
 
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
4,890
Likes
11,150
AFL Club
West Coast
#20
Underwhelming game, but finished with 21 disposals, 6 clearances, 8 tackles, 3 goals and 2 score assists. If he can produce those numbers in an underwhelming performance then sign me up.
Good exercise in temperance as we remember what his opposition was. No disrespect to NM but their B side isn’t something I would equate to stiff opposition.
A bit like Oscar Allen kicking 4 first half goals against WCE
I only watched the first half, he switched to the 2nds team in the 2nd half and probably played pretty pure midfield from that point (they also balanced the teams out considerably at that point). I'd hazard to guess that he had about a third of those stats in the first half but would love to see the breakdown.

It's not that he was bad by any means but I didn't like the role at all and didn't think he did anything to demand picking him. Will definitely be watching the preseason games as he's been on my radar since things opened and he had FWD status but if he plays that role again I'm not sure there's any stats that could change my mind. He's had 4 out of 13 seasons that he's scored at a passing grade, 1 was outstanding and 1 was very good with two reluctant pass marks. At the end of the day 9 out of 13, coming back from what he had on the wrong side of 30 with several emerging young players at his position is a pick that I want to see some really strong boxes ticked.

The 2nd half may very well have been huge, I didn't watch it. He may also have put up much better stats than the eye test in the first half but I can only write what I saw :)
NM Jordan Russell "we are not sure mid split, We have seen his ability to hit the scoreboard. In the 4 match sim, he kicked 10-12 goals but we love him around the contest and we think that's his biggest strength".

Sounds a real dilemma what his CBA will be, could be below the 70% mark with growth in other mids in last two years.
 
Top