Lions - Were solid for 2 quarters and turned it on in Q3 and Sydney couldn't go with them. They'd be mostly happy with things and had plenty of positives, very strong side to my eye, I'm not sold that anyone but Zorko and Lyons are best 22 (Adams also but might be done) and even Lyons I'm not as certain on.
Missing - Ah Chee, Zorko, Lyons, Adams, Gardiner, Lester, Mathieson and Answerth
Robertson - Played HF, I didn't notice any genuine midfield minutes.
Daniher - Looked really switched on, not sure how to take it but he laid probably the 3 best tackles of the game so there's that...
Dunkley - Just lock him in, pure midfield role and looked great. Wouldn't be at all shocked if he averaged 125 this year.
McCluggage - Also had a really pure midfield role which was interesting, there was some experimenting going on with their wings, which is where his fantasy game goes to die but he was the clear 3rd banana in the mids and he was solid. That interesting guy who is a 115+ type in this role but falls to a 90s type in all the other roles he can and does play. Will watch again next week, I don't think I can do it but it wouldn't shock me at all he heads to premium land, so much talent.
Berry - Pure wing role.
Ashcroft - Just lock him in also, clearly their 4th mid today in role, probably their 2nd mid in output. He's basically a 2nd Lachie Neale out there for them, classy, moves first at stoppages and reads it so clearly, was probably the cleanest by hands at the stoppages and then tackles everything that moves on the rare occasion that someone beats him to the ball. I actually think his skillset and performance is the main reason to not pick McCluggage, basically he wont be needed inside if he keeps this up. Also interesting where Lyons fits in, he basically can already do everything he does and all the things he can't as well. Easy on field rookie choice based on this game and role.
Neale - Picked up a knock early in Q3, he ran it off but definitely wasn't moving as freely after it, not sure if it was ankle or cork but not ideal at his price. On a positive, prior to that and even after it he was racking it up and prior to it was moving great. Pure midfield role. Definitely a strong option but worth watching how he pulls up from whatever it was.
Rich - I think he played pretty sparingly, took all kick-ins while he was out there and same old for him. I got burned last year so not as appealing but he probably deserves more attention as a pick.
McCarthy/Cameron/Hipwood/Gunston - All played the exact roles you would think they did, all played well.
Rayner - Played defense as expected, didn't really do anything of note in a good or bad way, just basically did the job. Took the Heeney matchup for extended stints and did a mostly good job on him. Didn't look out of his depth but also didn't look like he'd found his feet to turn it into a fantasy goldmine either.
Coleman - Role was same as last year, looked good, just not sure where he can find the 20 points he needs, think it's a when Rich is gone proposition right now, otherwise they probably just eat into each other's scores.
Prior - Came on in the 2nd half and went to half back, suggests he's behind in the race to me. Replaced Tunstill to my eye. Tunstill was the better for mine but did get a half compared to a quarter.
Sharp - Same story as Prior, replaced Wilmot as far as I could tell. Definitely feel like there's a battle between all 4. Sharp I think did more than Wilmot but also butchered it so there's that. Sharp has definitely filled out and looks like an AFL player now, one to watch.
McKenna - Role as expected at HB, very few touches and a fair bit of rust on those he had. I didn't notice him being beaten defensively, so that's the positive as locking the job down is the main part. He's cheap enough that even with a few bad games he'll make plenty of cash, it's mostly about locking down the spot. None of the competition was better and I don't think anyone missing really takes his slot except maybe Answerth who never really impressed me last year.
Tunstill - I thought he played very well, I didn't notice him in Q3, albeit the ball was very rarely in their defense, was playing HB and did the job well. I think there's a spot for him but it's a fierce competition and I don't think his JS could be trusted. Looked the goods as far as being able to hold it if he wins it though but at 190k, just needs better JS and scoring potential.
Andrews/Payne - Locked down the KPD spots and both played well. Don't think Buddy got a touch on Payne in Q3 and none of our KPF really had impact in H1.
Fort - Remained a pest in OMc's side, took far too much ruck work and annoying he was there at all. Not a good sign for the real stuff that they persisted with the two rucks thing.
Bailey - Was their other midfielder in a tight unit, was clearly number 5 in the group which makes sense, he's easily the best forward and worst mid in the mix. He played a really good game. I feel like there's a big season in him but I'm too broken by him to try and find it and will just join the masses if it happens.
Starcevich - Same old. Got a bit of it as he can sometimes but nothing else flashed.
Wilmot - Did disturbingly little in his minutes, wasn't a great game for the wings in general as none of them for either side really did much but definitely didn't seize his opportunity, if that's what this was. Positive is neither did Sharp, albeit Sharp found more of it.
McInerney - As mentioned in Fort, his presence is enough to end the dream if it continues. He played ok but you'd want a lot more against a kid and a KP type in the ruck. As someone desperately looking for a ruck to put their hand up all I got was another with an X next to their name unfortunately.