Strategy 2023: Round 5 Trades

[Santoz]

I've definitely been watching too much of the FIDE World Chess Championship as I'm sitting here on my couch thinking I'm calculating like Ding Liren.

Round 5.
OUT: Cole, Worpel, Hopper
IN: Stewart, Pickett, JVR

Boost this week was to save me 15k based on estimated scoring.

Round 6.
OUT: Ashcroft, Ginbey
IN: Sinclair, Williams

Round 7.
OUT: Mackenzie, Chandler
IN: Day, Rookie

All of these calculations, trades and cash in the bank, would work based on estimated price rise predictions ... Until Mackenzie was named sub & now there's a spanner in the works if he throws a 40 score this week

I also will have to have DPP swings everywhere, like JHF & Rozee in the mids, as I wait on rookie mids to show themselves. A precarious situation I've created for myself.

 

[XabiFernando]

A couple of weeks ago the wisdom on Constable was hold if named sub, trade if left out completely.

This round we have Mackenzie named sub and Davey left out completely, yet most people are looking to trade Mackenzie before Davey for JVR. What makes this situation different? Is Davey a genuine "managed" and walks back into the 22 next week? He hasn't set the world on fire and even if he's back it will be on Anzac day.

 

[Slacker]

St Kilda's Jack Bytel...is he the most likely contender for sub this week? Can't really see Campbell or Sharman being sub but have both Bytel and Mackenzie languishing on the bench as potential subs although both at least have manageable BE's for this round.
Poor Bytel does seem a little unlucky so far...should he be moved on for JVR this round or maybe hang fire for Matt Roberts next round?

 

[TBG]

Activate your boost - don’t worry you won’t actually use it. Trade JVR out and sub back into the mid position (whoever you used initially to swing him fwd). Swap Ginbey into the midfield and trade back in Jones. Using your boost, trade Mackenzie to JVR via DPP. Once it processes you will still have your boost at hand and only one trade will be used.

Don't think I can do this because Dawson has already played. When I do what you suggest it won't allow me to do it as I'm $96k short.

 

[Juzzo]

Don't think I can do this because Dawson has already played. When I do what you suggest it won't allow me to do it as I'm $96k short.

I have trouble swapping Ginbey to mids mid trade too.

 

[Juzzo]

Don't have to do any trades, but could do this:

Chesser to JVR
Davey to Madden
Mackenzie to Pickett

Not sure how Picket will go in wet today? But next few games look good, Richmond, North, Gold Coast, Hawks.
Dunks and Cogs end up in mids this week, Chandler on field (E, Madden C)
Next week trade out 2 def rooks, Sheezel and JZ swing to defence, Cogs and Dunks back to forwards and 2 rookie mids in.

Sound feasible?

 

[Beast_Mode]

Don't think I can do this because Dawson has already played. When I do what you suggest it won't allow me to do it as I'm $96k short.

Using your boost, trading Mackenzie to Jones via Ginbey will also work. In the backend it will recognise as 2 trades not 3 (because you are trading Jones out and back in within the same round).
SuperCoach will acknowledge your two trades as:
Rampe > Dawson
Mackenzie > JVR

 

[dlanod]

A couple of weeks ago the wisdom on Constable was hold if named sub, trade if left out completely.

This round we have Mackenzie named sub and Davey left out completely, yet most people are looking to trade Mackenzie before Davey for JVR. What makes this situation different? Is Davey a genuine "managed" and walks back into the 22 next week? He hasn't set the world on fire and even if he's back it will be on Anzac day.

Easy for me - Constable is $123k and will make money with a sub score. Getting sub means he's still on the fringe and could be back in.

Mackenzie is $250k+, we know he'll be back in, but the sub score will likely stop his money growth for two to three weeks.

Davey hasn't made as much money, and if he doesn't come back in next week we'll figure it out then.

 

[jaca]

Worth trading McKenzie out instead of Callaghan given the sub news?

 

[Maccas marvels]

Cmon Sheezel …8 more points to tonne up once again…
Ziebell seagulling it this quarter with the hundred raised

 

[Maccas marvels]

Do I take Combens score (60 with 5 minutes left) or field Oscar Baker instead?

 

[7/11]

Gone Rowston to JVR via Davey DPP. Can take Darcy’s VC and Phillips’ score as a result. Worth it in the long run I think as JVR’s JS is better than Rowston’s it seems.

 

[jaca]

Worth trading McKenzie out instead of Callaghan given the sub news?

Anyone have a view here? Both likely go between this round and the next.

 

[toxic]

Anyone have a view here? Both likely go between this round and the next.

If trading- Mackenzie is the one to go imho

 

[BigRuss]

Anyone have a view here? Both likely go between this round and the next.

Yeah I reversed and went McKenzie out. Cash gen is likely ruined. Callaghan is one good kicking day away from another 100. Might even be this week.

 

[dlanod]

Worth trading McKenzie out instead of Callaghan given the sub news?

I did

 

[donnybuang]

Anyone have a view here? Both likely go between this round and the next.

Anyone worth trading him to now, that's not played yet?

 

[jaca]

Anyone worth trading him to now, that's not played yet?

I’d traded Callaghan to JVR, so would be just trading Mackenzie to Callaghan to avoid a sub score and see if Callaghan can crack his BE from the bench.

 

[Peter56]

Worth trading McKenzie out instead of Callaghan given the sub news?

I just swapped my trade by bringing Callaghan back in, he should make more money than a sub game affected MacKenzie 🤞

 

[jaca]

Hoping for the random spike game which gets his earning going again. Don’t expect it, and it’ll be lost on my bench anyhow.