Discussion 2021 Round 11: Teams & In Game Discussion

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398847594772590593

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/aflratingsPete/status/1398847594772590593

 

[doc ron]

Weightmans 53 or Rowe?

 

[AngryAnt]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398847594772590593

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/aflratingsPete/status/1398847594772590593

They'll need to go close to 100% to get top 4 from here.

 

[Zimmer]

I wouldn’t expect more trades unless one or more of the byes have 8 teams rather than 6.

I am sure SC will make a quick decision in any case.

Yeah, I know... just a general reflection that it's probably no use changing plans. What will happen, will happen.

 

[Deeman1]

1,875 17+C (Macrae)

Laird, Dusty, Short, Warner, L Ryan to go (hopefully)

Seems OK without being great, plenty of time for things to go astray 😉

 

[Leroy]

They'll need to go close to 100% to get top 4 from here.

With the Dogs and Melbourne looking good both prelims could be in Melbourne anyway, so they may not need it as much as previous years.

 

[BomberSam]

Weightmans 53 or Rowe?

To play Rowe must be sooo tempting. Has looked electric the past few weeks. Wish I didn't trade him I think the sensible thing to do though is to take the 53.

 

[AngryAnt]

This is a game where Martin will either go huge or take the complete piss and do nothing.

 

[Vicwood]

Yikes - just back from work and checked some scores.

I'm only projecting 2230 so I'm in a world of pain looking at these scores getting around.......

Luxury....

 

[jaca]

Weightmans 53 or Rowe?

I’m going Rowe though I suspect there won’t be much in it.

 

[doc ron]

To play Rowe must be sooo tempting. Has looked electric the past few weeks. Wish I didn't trade him I think the sensible thing to do though is to take the 53.

Taking Weightman's 53 is the sensible thing to do. So in true George Costanza style I'll probably do the opposite.

 

[Bones]

I’m going Rowe though I suspect there won’t be much in it.

That’s what I said about Grundy 🙄

 

[Deeman1]

Weightmans 53 or Rowe?

Pretty sure I shouldn't be giving you advice 😉....

I think I would roll the dice with Adel at home and play Rowe.

If he can kick a couple he could go 70+, even if unlikely, more to gain than loose IMO 😃

 

[BomberSam]

Taking Weightman's 53 is the sensible thing to do. So in true George Costanza style I'll probably do the opposite.

If I had Rowe, I would be extremely tempted. Go for it legend

 

[Connoisseur]

Laird to record his 4th 120+ in a row today.

 

[Wheedus]

Umps in Richmond colours (again). Is it too much to ask to dig out the blue strip? Annoying for fans but I’d be seriously annoyed as an opposition team.

 

[Lost In The Sky]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398858545848672256

View: https://twitter.com/FOXFOOTY/status/1398858545848672256

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398859272167911425

View: https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1398859272167911425

 

[mike89]

Bolton goal!

 

[Connoisseur]

S Berry:
RD1-RD8: 1 goal and 8 behinds
RD9-RD11: 4 goals and 0 behinds

 

[doc ron]

Pretty sure I shouldn't be giving you advice 😉....

I think I would roll the dice with Adel at home and play Rowe.

If he can kick a couple he could go 70+, even if unlikely, more to gain than loose IMO 😃

I think you've got me covered easily Ash.