Discussion 2022: Rate My Team

Joined
19 Jan 2016
Messages
1,929
Likes
6,564
I don't agree he's the definition of a fallen premium when he has only been a premium for 2 years 3 years ago .
Not sure what happened in 2020, but he went in to 2021 with a poor preseason and reportedly played with a fracture in his back. He looks a totally different player this year. If he gets a 110 average from his price, that's gold.
 
Joined
20 May 2014
Messages
3,346
Likes
8,275
AFL Club
St Kilda
Done a 180 on the side on the side I had yesterday, read that Ryder might be playing from round 1, so it's probably a better idea to just get Marshall as a DPP if possible after round 6, rather than start him over Gawn. Need to make the decision early, rather than wait because Gawn plays tomorrow. To do this I'm gonna go Ridley > Hinge and McGovern > Heeney. Side is a lot safer, maybe safer than I usually go, but it's hard not to go safe and basic this year with the lack of rookie options. If I need cash to go Kelly > Jones, which I'll happily do if he's named, I'd go Lloyd > Ridley. If Cooper Stephens isn't named I'll go Hough, if Will Kelly isn't named and nobody else is I'll go O'Driscoll as an early loophole (not keen on Gibcus). Still quite worried about Hinge's shoulder but I'll take the gamble on his scoring potential. SDK, MacDonald and Durdin all seem highly, highly likely.
Do you mind if I ask where you read that? I just did Marshall R2 team for RDT thinking I hadn't read much about Ryder so he must be a while away, so might have to backtrack.
 
Joined
9 Feb 2015
Messages
9,440
Likes
57,908
AFL Club
West Coast
It was two .. but need to wait for teams. Will have one loophole regardless.
O’Driscoll, Dean & Uwland

Dean out for 9 weeks, Uwland out indefinitely with a back injury, O'Driscoll very unlikely - Freo have great depth in the mids.

So 2 certain long term zeros & 1 guy who is outside the 22 currently, will need injuries to get in or have rely on poor form from a teammate to get in.
 
Likes: PC
Joined
17 Feb 2013
Messages
1,474
Likes
3,407
AFL Club
Collingwood
I've had that midfield more than once, just cant bring myself to do it.
Yeah but "rookies determine your structure", right? I'll take the chance for the both of us :)

Also, I think our teams are becoming awfully cookie cutter. While I've a lot of players in the 200ks there are only really 3 bona fiide mid prices in Hewitt, Cripps and Rowell, each with a decent argument for being picked. So while it isn't officially MPM, hopefully the better spread of points in this setup avoids the 30s and 40s from failing rookies enough to make up for the lack of the 2 uber prems in the middle. Like I said, I have enough captain's options to feel comfortable there

If some decent 123 or less rookies show up with scoring power, I'll be happy to bring them in!
 
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
8,560
Likes
11,561
AFL Club
Collingwood
Yeah but "rookies determine your structure", right? I'll take the chance for the both of us :)

Also, I think our teams are becoming awfully cookie cutter. While I've a lot of players in the 200ks there are only really 3 bona fiide mid prices in Hewitt, Cripps and Rowell, each with a decent argument for being picked. So while it isn't officially MPM, hopefully the better spread of points in this setup avoids the 30s and 40s from failing rookies enough to make up for the lack of the 2 uber prems in the middle. Like I said, I have enough captain's options to feel comfortable there

If some decent 123 or less rookies show up with scoring power, I'll be happy to bring them in!
Guess what, I have gone back to it again. Gets me Pruess, Whitfield and Martin instead of Hayes, Hewitt and English with a few dollars for rookie corrections.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,697
Likes
30,160
AFL Club
Sydney
Yeah but "rookies determine your structure", right? I'll take the chance for the both of us :)

Also, I think our teams are becoming awfully cookie cutter. While I've a lot of players in the 200ks there are only really 3 bona fiide mid prices in Hewitt, Cripps and Rowell, each with a decent argument for being picked. So while it isn't officially MPM, hopefully the better spread of points in this setup avoids the 30s and 40s from failing rookies enough to make up for the lack of the 2 uber prems in the middle. Like I said, I have enough captain's options to feel comfortable there

If some decent 123 or less rookies show up with scoring power, I'll be happy to bring them in!
That combo of Cripps. Rowell and Berry really do determine structure. My two teams are based around these guys really, if I drop Cripps and Berry I can run three big guns and be pretty happy with coverage where the second team has super solid bench and MP options but I really do want the big 3. They could all go 140-160 in round 1
 
Joined
15 Oct 2018
Messages
3,912
Likes
12,177
AFL Club
Essendon
Do you mind if I ask where you read that? I just did Marshall R2 team for RDT thinking I hadn't read much about Ryder so he must be a while away, so might have to backtrack.
The article I read was on fox sports, and it said "Ryder could make a return on Friday", but now that article says nothing of the sort (may have been amended or I'm looking at the wrong article?) and the AFL website is saying Ryder is unlikely to play and only did half a session today. Looks like Ryder is not playing after all :LOL:

I still think my side is a lot safer with no Marshall so I'll probably stick to it, but you should be free to start Marshall in fantasy
 
Last edited:
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
Guess what, I have gone back to it again. Gets me Pruess, Whitfield and Martin instead of Hayes, Hewitt and English with a few dollars for rookie corrections.
I keep coming back to that setup as well even though the mids look skinny. It just makes the others lines look right AND it gets the better rookies on field. We all know it's the rookie scores that set teams apart in the pre-upgrade period, not so much the premiums.
 
Joined
17 Feb 2013
Messages
1,474
Likes
3,407
AFL Club
Collingwood
That combo of Cripps. Rowell and Berry really do determine structure. My two teams are based around these guys really, if I drop Cripps and Berry I can run three big guns and be pretty happy with coverage where the second team has super solid bench and MP options but I really do want the big 3. They could all go 140-160 in round 1
Each are pretty popular picks on their own. I haven't really researched it much but reckon having all 3 will be pretty uncommon, mainly because you are either going Neale at M2 or wasting Ward on the bench and noone really wants to do that

But hopefully 300+ppg for a smidge over a mil. Should be a bit of an edge in that, injuries permitting. Then there's the more robust backline that Hondo just mentioned
 
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
8,560
Likes
11,561
AFL Club
Collingwood
That combo of Cripps. Rowell and Berry really do determine structure. My two teams are based around these guys really, if I drop Cripps and Berry I can run three big guns and be pretty happy with coverage where the second team has super solid bench and MP options but I really do want the big 3. They could all go 140-160 in round 1
That is just what I am fearing, but having said that Cripps is too cheap to ignore, particulary since he is fit. Hopefully he can be up there with an Oliver, Steele etc for a while.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
I need to make a decision on which 2 out of Brodie , Curnow , McGovern & Xerri to start and go cheap on my bench (likely Durdin & Dixon/Hayes/SDK).

Don't really want to lose Butters and/or Heeney.

How many defender rookies named seems to be the key.
This is probably one of the bigger conundrums most coaches are facing, which two of Brodie, Curnow, McGovern, Xerri. For what it's worth I've got Gov ahead of the rest of them and Xerri second if he is given prominent ruck role. I don't trust Brodie's job security, lowish tog in pre-season games, no Fyfe in their side but can still score and not considering Curnow.
 
Joined
17 Feb 2013
Messages
1,474
Likes
3,407
AFL Club
Collingwood
This is probably one of the bigger conundrums most coaches are facing, which two of Brodie, Curnow, McGovern, Xerri. For what it's worth I've got Gov ahead of the rest of them and Xerri second if he is given prominent ruck role. I don't trust Brodie's job security, lowish tog in pre-season games, no Fyfe in their side but can still score and not considering Curnow.
Same. You take a change in role over a change in team any day and that means Gov and Xerri are in over Brodie. I wish Curnow the best except for when he plays our mob - reckon with our depleted backline, he should have a field day if your bolstered mids do the job over ours.

If Gov or Xerri is a bust, then it's straight to Ralphsmith or spend my excess on getting Brodie in. This buys me time to see where they're at for a couple of weeks.
 
Joined
11 Jan 2014
Messages
5,651
Likes
4,986
AFL Club
Essendon
Each are pretty popular picks on their own. I haven't really researched it much but reckon having all 3 will be pretty uncommon, mainly because you are either going Neale at M2 or wasting Ward on the bench and noone really wants to do that

But hopefully 300+ppg for a smidge over a mil. Should be a bit of an edge in that, injuries permitting. Then there's the more robust backline that Hondo just mentioned
I've got 3 and Neale at M3... I'm happy to wait and see on Ward. Having said that I'm also not 100% sure about my team yet so don't listen to me!
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
Same. You take a change in role over a change in team any day and that means Gov and Xerri are in over Brodie. I wish Curnow the best except for when he plays our mob - reckon with our depleted backline, he should have a field day if your bolstered mids do the job over ours.

If Gov or Xerri is a bust, then it's straight to Ralphsmith or spend my excess on getting Brodie in. This buys me time to see where they're at for a couple of weeks.
It's also why I don't think you can go with all three off the bat, even if only one of the three fails, who do you go to as a correction?
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
This is probably one of the bigger conundrums most coaches are facing, which two of Brodie, Curnow, McGovern, Xerri. For what it's worth I've got Gov ahead of the rest of them and Xerri second if he is given prominent ruck role. I don't trust Brodie's job security, lowish tog in pre-season games, no Fyfe in their side but can still score and not considering Curnow.
It's interesting , Dunkley + all 5 allows the 4-Sicily-3 rookie backline , cookie cutter midfield + 2 premium rucks.

D Stephens down to a $ 117k (but will ? + MacDonald make enough $$$) then allows one of Brodie , Curnow , McGovern , Xerri to become Butters (personally prefer Heeney)
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
It's interesting , Dunkley + all 5 allows the 4-Sicily-3 rookie backline , cookie cutter midfield + 2 premium rucks.

D Stephens down to a $ 117k (but will ? + MacDonald make enough $$$) then allows one of Brodie , Curnow , McGovern , Xerri to become Butters (personally prefer Heeney)
Prefer Heeney over Butters, why's that? Also don't think D. Stephens should be removed just for a quick cash grab.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
Prefer Heeney over Butters, why's that? Also don't think D. Stephens should be removed just for a quick cash grab.
Huge Heeney fan (must have commented on him a million times by now) , curious to see if and how KH changes his midfield , still expect Boak & Wines to be the major players.

Amon , Butters , Gray , Houston , Drew , Rozee , SPP etc might all share rapid rotations to try and mix things up.

KH doesn't like to change things up to much though , might not have a choice though if they wish to take the next step.

Agree about D Stephens , my problem now will be just panicking and picking too many rookies that are named and vanish by Round 3-4.
 
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
It's also why I don't think you can go with all three off the bat, even if only one of the three fails, who do you go to as a correction?
If you include Naish in that group and don’t start all 4 then in theory you have an out.

Then there is the option to swap to Pruess via DPP
 
Top