Discussion 2023 Round 2: Teams & In Game Discussion

[NT.Thunder]

What's with all the hot weather, over beer drinking, Jellyfish and Cyclones up there anyway? I did enjoy your Military Museums though, especially the B52

Used to be a great place, gone to poo now though.

 

[Manikato1]

Ashcroft to the bench to take Hollands score. Agree with previous posters, Hollands is a class rookie.

 

[Amazing Bombers]

1/73
Just Docherty on field for me with Cowan on bench. Well done to anyone who picked Hollands, looks good so far.

 

[Rumbler]

Full-time scores (fully scaled).

Cameron was one-man army 🔥
Well played Carlton though, big win.

p.s. Hollands only 2 points behind Doch! 😁

 

[Russty_]

Same - and that is including everyone getting 1 for the draw.

Maybe we're too optimistic?

 

[Drew]

Full-time scores (fully scaled).

Cameron was one-man army 🔥
Well played Carlton though, big win.

p.s. Hollands only 2 points behind Doch! 😁

View attachment 54414
View attachment 54413

Yuck, Cripps scaled down one point to 99, I liked 100 much better!

 

[dicksilverman]

Keeping Laurie this week to bank Hollands E score. Points in the bank, can correct Laurie next week.

 

[Professor]

2/172 Cripps and Doc, Cowan with the E

 

[Socrates2]

But are they?

Yes because they've done nothing incorrect and their season looks stuffed. Have a heart NT.

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638859841975488512

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/FantasyFreako/status/1638859841975488512

 

[Miller is a Steele]

1/73
Just Doc on field. Happy with the performances from Hollands (E) and Cowan

 

[Woodsey]

Looking like Hollands is one I will need to get. Probably for Chesser next week

 

[Professor]

haha

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638754644246822917

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/aflratings/status/1638754644246822917

 

[Seymour Skinner]

2/144

Docherty a bit underwhelming.
Taking Hollands score via Bytel.

Cowan E too, will get his 51 if Jones ends up missing, happy enough with that.

Thought Esava played ok, at least in the first half, dirty as on Dimma for naming Ryan this week and not round 1.

 

[NT.Thunder]

Yes because they've done nothing incorrect and their season looks stuffed. Have a heart NT.

Seasons are not stuffed after one round - there will be a lot of good coaches with him I know that will still finish top 1000. This is fantasy football. For every Stewart you have someone else has a Fyfe or a Jones or whoever.........some have 3 some have 1 and some none. we'll all go though it at some stage this season but Stewart owners can think themselves lucky they won't be losing any cash.

 

[Johnsy44]

Hollands could be that hidden gem rookie this year. Was slept on all preseason due to it not being clear where hit fit in combined with LOB. But it's looking like he could be one of the better rookie choices. Yes his scores haven't set the world on fire, but gee he looks class. From all the rookies, I think he's now up there at the higher end of JS, with how hard he works and the continuous 2nd efforts and defensive plays, there is no way he leaves our side, it's his spot to lose. A little better DE tonight and if he didn't spray that set shot, that could have been a very good score tonight for him. Looking like a must-have IMO

 

[Rowsus]

Yes because they've done nothing incorrect and their season looks stuffed. Have a heart NT.

Are you seriously suggesting, that anyone who traded Stewart to Docherty is already in the "season stuffed"? basket.
1 trade down, 1 score roughly 30-35 lower than hoped/expected.
Bit melodramatic, don't you think?

 

[Athomas]

Hollands could be that hidden gem rookie this year. Was slept on all preseason due to it not being clear where hit fit in combined with LOB. But it's looking like he could be one of the better rookie choices. Yes his scores haven't set the world on fire, but gee he looks class. From all the rookies, I think he's now up there at the higher end of JS, with how hard he works and the continuous 2nd efforts and defensive plays, there is no way he leaves our side, it's his spot to lose. A little better DE tonight and if he didn't spray that set shot, that could have been a very good score tonight for him. Looking like a must-have IMO

Yep - was about to post a similar thing. Once LOB wasn't named in the 22 with Hollands, great sign. Scores haven't really come yet (wingers often undeserved) but he will have a big game. Heck if he kicked one of his goal attempts he probably goes 85.

Pretty tough Hollands E decision, 71 vs Flanders vs Ashcroft (picking two)

The fact that Flanders plays pretty late, and can cover M/F if I actually need him, think I'll go 71+Ashcroft and bench Flanders. If he goes 80+, at least I don't have to think about trading him next round

 

[Baglimit]

Used to be a great place, gone to poo now though.

The dry is almost here, though dragonfly’s havent shown up yet, when they do its paradise .Thats a big shed to house Stratofortress 92596

 

[Montyjnr]

Looking like Hollands is one I will need to get. Probably for Chesser next week

I'm still not sure if he is worth the 162K price tag.

Great talent, but has an awful role. Needs to play a blinder just to score 80.