Discussion 2023 Round 4: Teams & In Game Discussion

[Rowsus]

Need Mackenzie to lift, to win my match-up against @Creeker.

Me: Moore (60) + Mackenzie (28)
v
Creeker: Worpel (47) + 73

 

[xanderdom]

Fergie -13 BE, was projected to hit 38 and generate $23k this round.

Currently on 54 at the half, and could be on pace for an 80-90. He could rake in $45k+ for us instead.

 

[Russty_]

So, he can optimise his output when he is on the field, and thus, score 37 SC pts at quarter time?

I get that, in hindsight, but it was after about 3 or 4 minutes and he'd already had a good influence on the game. Just seemed a bit strange to take him off then.

 

[7/11]

Mitch Duncan obviously been eating magnets in the off-season. Ball just seems to keep finding him!

 

[Wheedus]

Bowes appears to be playing forward. I “question vigorously“ what Scott is actually doing

 

[30BucketsofRo]

What happens with Ratugolea’s DPP status, as he he is already R/F? Should become Def-eligible too but my understanding is he wouldn’t lose R/F status?

 

[PC]

Come Hawks, make this week a good week.

 

[Athomas]

Fergie -13 BE, was projected to hit 38 and generate $23k this round.

Currently on 54 at the half, and could be on pace for an 80-90. He could rake in $45k+ for us instead.

Yep. Will be hard for majority to downgrade this week if he goes 70+ which he should.

Bowes appears to be playing forward. I “question vigorously“ what Scott is actually doing

Expected (at least I did) with Duncan coming in. Reckon Duncan might hurt Stewart a little too (too early to tell)

What happens with Ratugolea’s DPP status, as he he is already R/F? Should become Def-eligible too but my understanding is he wouldn’t lose R/F status?

Can only have two positions eligible, and they don't lose status, so no DEF status for Esava.

 

[30BucketsofRo]

oCan only have two positions eligible, and they don't lose status, so no DEF status for Esava.

Thank you!

 

[Maccas marvels]

Those with the Rat at R2 would be happy….55 from 7 touches….

should restart his cash gen after this game….May hold after this game

 

[Bermi]

Need Mackenzie to lift, to win my match-up against @Creeker.

Me: Moore (60) + Mackenzie (28)
v
Creeker: Worpel (47) + 73

I'm the opposite, I don't want Mackenzie to score well.
Me: + 57
Tamuhawk: + Mackenzie.

(Philzsay just needs 33 from Mackenzie to beat me, not following that one. )

 

[Tails]

Bowes appears to be playing forward. I “question vigorously“ what Scott is actually doing

Pretty sure that he got robbed of a tackle that Qtr too ...

 

[7/11]

Yep. Will be hard for majority to downgrade this week if he goes 70+ which he should.

I was surprised at the amount mentioning trading Greene out. He’s looked a great option for the Hawks forward line and doesn’t seem like he’ll be dropped in the short term.

 

[sethlad]

Need Mackenzie to lift, to win my match-up against @Creeker.

Me: Moore (60) + Mackenzie (28)
v
Creeker: Worpel (47) + 73

Didnt see him in the centre bounce at all in 1st half

 

[Rowsus]

So where was Edge in that review???!!!

 

[Gruffles]

C'MON CATS!
Just need the one win so the season doesn't fall apart

 

[NT.Thunder]

Trades Will Day in - nekminit suspended 2 weeks

 

[Maccas marvels]

Think for Will Day unfortunately that dangerous tackle might cost him a week…
just my own opinion…cats players head hit the ground…
hopefully not …

 

[Maccas marvels]

Wingard on for Brocky whom has been subbed….

 

[Ironhawk]

Hawks have stopped here, could get ugly.