Position 2023: Ruck Discussion

Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
639
Likes
1,905
AFL Club
Collingwood
Think English will be the best Ruck in terms of average per full games played, how many he actually plays at full capacity is the problem, dont think anyone in the comp has his ceiling.

I really like Darcy as a player but wanted a good pre season so these recurring niggles could be a thing of the past and it hasnt happened.

Very quickly run out of options.
I think English could be the best ruck this season but the problem is his injury/concussion concerns. I'm struggling to have confidence with him playing the season out. Witts gives me a bit more confidence due to besides his ACL going he has reasonable surety of turning up each week on the park where as I can't say the same about English😩
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,773
Likes
26,273
AFL Club
Sydney
I think it defaults to Grundy sadly. The lowest price he has been since 2017, we know he can score well, has a great mid fueld around him, should go at 100 at least, other options are probably higher risk.
Grundy is a real hard one.

There's such a huge "got his contract and doesn't care" about him. Downward trend for 4 straight seasons to the point where his team gave him away. His starting average is his legitimate average from last year and now he's in a ruck share with the best ruckman in the league. This is a guy who's never been good when ruck sharing.

Really Grundy's "shining light" this year is he's such a terrible forward that we're all assuming he'll get the lion's share of the ruckwork but the reality is Gawn isn't a very good forward either and he's a much better ruckman.

Also worth noting that the list of ruckman who averaged 95+ while in a ruck share was Gawn last year and his ruck share was still dominant enough that his partner got FWD status this season. Best guys in genuine ruck shares were Marshall, OMc and and Goldy, and Goldy the pick of them at 93.

Grundy might be good, maybe the Pies basically paying to get rid of him will light a fire that hasn't been there since he got his contract and he comes out firing, maybe they Gawn has added significant forward skill and basically allows Grundy to ruck 70%+ but that's a lot of maybes for what is not a significant discount.

FWIW, I think most of this applies to Gawn also, wouldn't shock me if either were still the top ruck but I wouldn't back it at the same time.

For mine the top 5 rucks removing durability is English, Darcy, Marshall, NicNat and Witts but for the first 4 durability is an enormous factor that really can't be ignored. I think both Gawn and Grundy could be in that group and ROB is really just his midfield dragging him along from being capable also but his lack of ruck skill is definitely a worry and I'm not sold he has the midfield to do that and he's not really shown anything to suggest his ruckwork can improve, he can't jump and he's already big and strong so I'm just not sure he can add it, especially given he looks genuinely uncoordinated in all facets and that holds up with the tapwork.

Again, the rucks are a nightmare and I'm still yet to settle on anything that resembles certainty.

The fact NicNat is now one of the most durable ruck options sums up the complete lunacy of the position.
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,409
Likes
65,138
AFL Club
Essendon
What’s the case against D Cameron ?(other than the preseason injury - which he is now over)

Averaged 96.5 after the Grundy injury, $465k and is R/F so can slot him into F6/F7 if things go well.

Seems to be the best option to allow you to “wait and see” who the best R2 option is.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,761
Likes
11,758
AFL Club
West Coast
Grundy is a real hard one.

There's such a huge "got his contract and doesn't care" about him. Downward trend for 4 straight seasons to the point where his team gave him away. His starting average is his legitimate average from last year and now he's in a ruck share with the best ruckman in the league. This is a guy who's never been good when ruck sharing.

Really Grundy's "shining light" this year is he's such a terrible forward that we're all assuming he'll get the lion's share of the ruckwork but the reality is Gawn isn't a very good forward either and he's a much better ruckman.

Also worth noting that the list of ruckman who averaged 95+ while in a ruck share was Gawn last year and his ruck share was still dominant enough that his partner got FWD status this season. Best guys in genuine ruck shares were Marshall, OMc and and Goldy, and Goldy the pick of them at 93.

Grundy might be good, maybe the Pies basically paying to get rid of him will light a fire that hasn't been there since he got his contract and he comes out firing, maybe they Gawn has added significant forward skill and basically allows Grundy to ruck 70%+ but that's a lot of maybes for what is not a significant discount.

FWIW, I think most of this applies to Gawn also, wouldn't shock me if either were still the top ruck but I wouldn't back it at the same time.

For mine the top 5 rucks removing durability is English, Darcy, Marshall, NicNat and Witts but for the first 4 durability is an enormous factor that really can't be ignored. I think both Gawn and Grundy could be in that group and ROB is really just his midfield dragging him along from being capable also but his lack of ruck skill is definitely a worry and I'm not sold he has the midfield to do that and he's not really shown anything to suggest his ruckwork can improve, he can't jump and he's already big and strong so I'm just not sure he can add it, especially given he looks genuinely uncoordinated in all facets and that holds up with the tapwork.

Again, the rucks are a nightmare and I'm still yet to settle on anything that resembles certainty.

The fact NicNat is now one of the most durable ruck options sums up the complete lunacy of the position.
NicNat and durable do not belong in the same sentence or in any other juxtaposition.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,761
Likes
11,758
AFL Club
West Coast
To me, this a big black X against ROB.
To some, it might pique their interest in him, but not for me. If you were taking him, you'd be looking for areas where he might improve, and he's very unlikely to improve in this area.
Pity Thilthorpe is not R/F. If ROB were suddenly to be a non starter Rd 1 (and I wish him no ill) then comments like below make you think about other options for the Crows. From Friday training report on BF.

1676382947228.png
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,134
Likes
64,903
AFL Club
Melbourne
Sorry, what does this part mean?
It means there were no injury scores to lower his output to the achieved 6/103.5 from last season. Only one game where Cox played. No mitigating circumstances, except for Grundy's own physical condition. TOG% was pretty consistent.
Basically, it was WYSIWYG, with no hidden factors to consider.
 
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
1,928
Likes
5,871
It means there were no injury scores to lower his output to the achieved 6/103.5 from last season. Only one game where Cox played. No mitigating circumstances, except for Grundy's own physical condition. TOG% was pretty consistent.
Basically, it was WYSIWYG, with no hidden factors to consider.
Ta, what do you put the Rd 5 53 down to?
 
Top