Discussion BBL|09 SuperCoach BBL In Game Discussion

[IDIG]

Zampa out? Wow, I was thinking of bringing in Hinchliffe as a pod, going by his scoring patterns he's due. With Lamichhane out, Zampa and Hinchliffe should get maximum overs with possibly Maxwell bowling a couple, would leave 10 between Rauf, NCN, Stoinis, Worrell if he plays.

Yeah it’s a bit of a punt and upgrading him to Smith. I figure the masses will be on Zampa at his price point so might as well try and create a POD seeing I’ve already fallen behind this round.

 

[Darkie]

Worth going Abbott to Zampa so I can go Nevill to Phillipe?

Worth flagging that there was an article (probably earlier in this thread!) suggesting that Abbott may not be able to bowl at 100%. Sounded like he was fit enough and bowling well in the nets, but that he may not be able to bowl at or sustain full pace.

 

[Diabolical]

Hmmm..... Advice for the opposition (doubles comp )
FWIW - Think i’d do the same.
Or it could be reverse psychology.

Bugger ... I forgot about that!

 

[bomberboy]

393/5+C. Thought I was doing well but not judging by some of the scores here!

 

[jaca]

Bugger ... I forgot about that!

Looking forward to an Abbott 5fa and @Diabolical with the (C)

 

[KLo30]

393/5+C. Thought I was doing well but not judging by some of the scores here!

Do remember that most people only post their good scores, much like gamblers talking about their wins and not their loses.

 

[jaca]

355/4/Short C

 

[OnTopBar]

3/309 if I take Short's VC. 3 out of my 4 Canes players were on the bench, so no real loss there apart from the opportunity cost.

Now a decision to be made, do I trade Abbot and my BWL donut to Dwarshuis and Hinchcliffe? Or wait until the toss and load up on whoever bats 1st?
Team after the Abbot trade:
Maxwell
Stoinis
Zampa
Rauf
Hinchcliffe

Smith
Philippe
Dwarshuis.

*Edit....Looking at the Sixers batting line up, none of them fill me with any confidence.

 

[Connoisseur]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222835664514764801

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222844092297515008

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222848642639224832

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222851406056443904

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222853666530443264

 

[lappinitup]

No rain tonight i will have:
Stoinis, Maxwell, Cartwright, Handscomb, Rauf, NCN, henriques .... Yes stars focused.

Rain around (game starting) Stars Bat first:
Stoinis, Maxwell, Cartwright, Phillipe, Abbott, Dwarshuis, O'Keefe

Rain around (game starting) Sixes Bat First
Maxwell, Smith, Vince, Phillipe, Rauf, NCN, Henriques

 

[Herbie66]

No rain tonight i will have:
Stoinis, Maxwell, Cartwright, Handscomb, Rauf, NCN, henriques .... Yes stars focused.

Rain around (game starting) Stars Bat first:
Stoinis, Maxwell, Cartwright, Phillipe, Abbott, Dwarshuis, O'Keefe

Rain around (game starting) Sixes Bat First
Maxwell, Smith, Vince, Phillipe, Rauf, NCN, Henriques

? for Cartwright

 

[Herbie66]

Squad Announcement - Adelaide Strikers

Unchanged XIII

 

[mike89]

I feel like there's more pressure for me to get my picks right here with only 4 slots left than if I had had six like most people here.

Undoubtedly if I pick wrong then a selection I would have made with more slots will go big and I'll lose all the advantage I got last night.

Feel like Zampa vs Smith is going to dictate this match and there's a really strong case to be made for either of them going large. Hadn't considered weather yet though...

 

[Sideshow Bob]

I feel like there's more pressure for me to get my picks right here with only 4 slots left than if I had had six like most people here.

Undoubtedly if I pick wrong then a selection I would have made with more slots will go big and I'll lose all the advantage I got last night.

Feel like Zampa vs Smith is going to dictate this match and there's a really strong case to be made for either of them going large. Hadn't considered weather yet though...

I get what you saying
I have 3 loops to decide and they are all borderline for me short for Vc, fergo and ellis.
Any other round I’d take 68 for a vc, and 50+ for a loop but i feel this isn’t quite the point in the bank it should be and I’m not sure why?

 

[THCLT]

I get what you saying
I have 3 loops to decide and they are all borderline for me short for Vc, fergo and ellis.
Any other round I’d take 68 for a vc, and 50+ for a loop but i feel this isn’t quite the point in the bank it should be and I’m not sure why?

Ask yourself the following questions:

1. What was your expectation/benchmark for the VC and bench loops prior to the game...?

2. Are they still within the accepted range or has your expectation/benchmark increased after seeing the scores from that game...?

3. Do you feel that you're behind those teams with Hales/Uz hence the need to search for comparative scores from the 2nd game...?

 

[jaca]

Thoughts on Lyon? I’ve had him in my team for a few days, but toying with going to Henriques (who always seems to score well when I don’t own him).

 

[Ironhawk]

Thoughts on Lyon? I’ve had him in my team for a few days, but toying with going to Henriques (who always seems to score well when I don’t own him).

Stick with Lyon as I currently have Henriques . I could do with a decent score for once.

Honestly, I have no idea - either could score well and both could do badly.

 

[Creeker]

6 / 537. Short VC.
Loop on Fergy. Loop off Wade.
Messed up the Qais loop, had Sutherland on field and Qais on bench. Last minute tinkering and suddenly it was reversed.
(possibly a alcohol effected stuff up.)
Maxwell, Stoinis, Rauf, Vince and Philippe to play.

 

[Herbie66]

Squad Announcement - Sydney Thunder

Unchanged XIII

 

[Shaunpro1]

Knowing this season lock in Hussain for 3fa, not sure who to pick for this game really...