Discussion BBL|10 SC: Team & In-Game Discussion - Home of #1 and #2 Leagues
- Thread starter Goodie's Guns
- Start date
Some great suggestions no doubt.
@Professor
But nothing at all about trades.
Allow the same number of trades we have now but let coaches use them as they wish
eg 1-2 a round , bank the rest for the future
maybe affects the casual player too much , those that actually think and strategise rounds in advance get to benefit when they can use their "banked" trades and have 4-5 or more available in a Round.
Do a lot of us automatically use 3 trades each round because they are their ?
Or have a "wildcard" option where once (or twice) a season you can use 5-6 trades in that round (and it doesn't affect your balance)
Maybe the casual player who is down and out then has the chance to reset 50% of his/her team and their interest improves.
@Professor
But nothing at all about trades.
Allow the same number of trades we have now but let coaches use them as they wish
eg 1-2 a round , bank the rest for the future
maybe affects the casual player too much , those that actually think and strategise rounds in advance get to benefit when they can use their "banked" trades and have 4-5 or more available in a Round.
Do a lot of us automatically use 3 trades each round because they are their ?
Or have a "wildcard" option where once (or twice) a season you can use 5-6 trades in that round (and it doesn't affect your balance)
Maybe the casual player who is down and out then has the chance to reset 50% of his/her team and their interest improves.
Last edited:
Thats a huge cell right over Adelaide, must be pissing down.
http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR643.loop.shtml
http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR643.loop.shtml
I'm not sure if this would work.. but would scoring systems be changed to have a third group for DPP players? Bat only players have something that supports them, bowlers only the same, and then all rounders/DPP have a more balanced system (that maybe mirrors the bowler and bat systems but slightly less points per action? Seems like some of the issues come from there being a class of players that effectively get to double dip across the two scoring systems, meaning anything that tries to balance either will also continue to benefit all rounders.
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2014
- Messages
- 9,869
- Likes
- 39,224
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Great catching up on this conversation.
Something I have thought about is every player starting off with points then they pay to get opportunity in the game. This can also benefit a rain shortened game so at least players have a chance to score.
For example every player starts with 20 points. If they come in to bat in the first over they lose the 20 points, second over 19 points and so on. When bowling, the player loses a point for every ball they bowl.
So in theory a player who opens and bowls four overs has the most to lose (20 + 24 = 44 points) meaning they could theoretically finish on -24 points. However they have had more opportunity to score so that should get o***et. A player who doesn’t bowl and comes in to bat in the final over but doesn’t face a ball only loses 1 point so at least scores 19 points rather than zero.
Something I have thought about is every player starting off with points then they pay to get opportunity in the game. This can also benefit a rain shortened game so at least players have a chance to score.
For example every player starts with 20 points. If they come in to bat in the first over they lose the 20 points, second over 19 points and so on. When bowling, the player loses a point for every ball they bowl.
So in theory a player who opens and bowls four overs has the most to lose (20 + 24 = 44 points) meaning they could theoretically finish on -24 points. However they have had more opportunity to score so that should get o***et. A player who doesn’t bowl and comes in to bat in the final over but doesn’t face a ball only loses 1 point so at least scores 19 points rather than zero.