Discussion BBL|14 Teams & In Game Discussion

[nmh94]

I have Agar as E. To get him on field, I need to rely on either Bazley or Doggett missing both games, which could backfire in their second game, or can lock it in, but have to take Billings' score as well. Tough choice.

I wouldn't rely on those guys missing both games.

As I write, I think your decision is now made!!! Now I am wondering whether to take Billings' 40 as my E. Alternative is to play Sam Harper.

 

[Ironhawk]

Yeah, that helps.

 

[Darkie]

Come on Tom, a quick 20 is on the table

 

[Old Big 'Ead]

I’ve only got Zampa and Sutherland so it’s been a good outcome for me. Problem is I only own M. Short and Overton as well from the Strikers and might loop Bazley in if he does anything.

Might be a good thing, not owning many DGR this round. SGR's might be the way to go after tonight's shemozzle.

I have 11 DGR's this round, but as has been my story this season, most of my DGR's go disastrously - Bethell, Seifert, JFM. Other rounds have included Weatherald, Allen, Peirson, Stoinis, Zampa, and McKenzie.

DGR's can often be overrated.

 

[Zoku Pops]

Well at least the good thing about DGR players is they have two games they can score points in... #brightside

 

[mike89]

What the hell was that Sam?

 

[Under The Dome]

20 up!

 

[Miller is a Steele]

Nice junk from Rogers here!

 

[Beg2Differ]

Might be a good thing, not owning many DGR this round. SGR's might be the way to go after tonight's shemozzle.

I have 11 DGR's this round, but as has been my story this season, most of my DGR's go disastrously - Bethell, Seifert, JFM. Other rounds have included Weatherald, Allen, Peirson, Stoinis, Zampa, and McKenzie.

DGR's can often be overrated.

Yes because SGRs are guaranteed to score well in their one game. Remember DGRs are just SGRs with another game.

 

[Under The Dome]

Sams saving a few points from Rogers

 

[nmh94]

Dammit that would have been soooo useful to have gone for 6! Still some useful junk from Rogers.

 

[mike89]

That sucks. That completely changes how I feel about tonight. Rogers in the 40s is an okay fade. Rogers in the 70s is not!

0/87 or 1/127 (will take higher of Billings/Turner)
Only 3/4 SI though so not hugely invested.

 

[Darkie]

Rogers quick 20, nice!

 

[Miller is a Steele]

Lazy running only getting 1 there, a 2 would’ve got him an extra 6 SC points.

 

[Beg2Differ]

Geez those junk points for Rogers sting for non owners. No way that happens if I have him.

 

[Under The Dome]

66 for Rogers

 

[Old Big 'Ead]

Yes because SGRs are guaranteed to score well in their one game. Remember DGRs are just SGRs with another game.

Couldn't agree more.

My point is that is that we often seek DGR players over SGR players, for the sake that they're playing two games, when it may not be beneficial to choose them.

 

[Aston]

If that ball went for 6, Rogers would have an extra 20 SC points. This game has the finest of margins…

 

[Ben's Beasts]

0/179

Rogers VC tempting but don’t think it’s quite enough to pass up M Short or Overton.

Decent enough start from K Richo and Zampa. Need Brown to stick around longer to generate a decent score.

Glad that fading Sutherland (again) didn’t punish me (yet).

 

[mike89]

If that ball went for 6, Rogers would have an extra 20 SC points. This game has the finest of margins…

Daniel Sams appreciation post, making the save even with the game dead and buried