@Grainfebeef
Your point on having 1 less premium mid and having that premium in the fwd to eliminate the weak rookie and have a stronger rookie in the middle is a good one. However I think though that consideration needs to be made for the 2 premiums in this scenario also.
Yes Oli Wines would likley score 15-25 more points than say a J neade or Thom lee however similarly this is likley o***et by the premium forward likley scoring 15-25 less than the premium mid that has been given up.
If it was accepted that the points differences were the same for both combos then it comes down to cash generation as the deciding factor for which this article demonstrates.
Also we need to consider that a premium mid vs a premium fwd has advantages imo as the premium mid is likley to score more consitantly and as priced far higher is harder to trade up to and get into our teams. Given this my choice would be to have the premium mid and weaker rookie vs the premium fwd and stronger mid rookie.
Thoughts?
Your point on having 1 less premium mid and having that premium in the fwd to eliminate the weak rookie and have a stronger rookie in the middle is a good one. However I think though that consideration needs to be made for the 2 premiums in this scenario also.
Yes Oli Wines would likley score 15-25 more points than say a J neade or Thom lee however similarly this is likley o***et by the premium forward likley scoring 15-25 less than the premium mid that has been given up.
If it was accepted that the points differences were the same for both combos then it comes down to cash generation as the deciding factor for which this article demonstrates.
Also we need to consider that a premium mid vs a premium fwd has advantages imo as the premium mid is likley to score more consitantly and as priced far higher is harder to trade up to and get into our teams. Given this my choice would be to have the premium mid and weaker rookie vs the premium fwd and stronger mid rookie.
Thoughts?