Opinion Round 1: Teams and In Game Discussions
- Thread starter Philzsay
- Start date
Like many others, I saw that Hartley wasn't playing and went "oh ****" and traded in Weithering. I do have Ruggles though (and am keeping him I think), so threw Weithering on the bench with the E - was looking like a top move there for a while...
Menadue on the mid bench with the E, so Balic could have a look at his score and allow VC Ablett to be awesome if required.
Kerridge on the field in the forwards - he has to play on the field imo.
So, all in all a reasonable start (like most others).
Had Gibbs all pre-season, although I wanted him at M7. When I couldn't get that (even after I moved Shaw on for Bartel to allow for more expensive rookies like Weithering
), out he went. Shame after his score last night, but the logic and the reasons stay the same for me - expected him to score around the 100-105 mark and give me a step if I needed one, but would be the first out if I needed cash (I don't have Libba).
Had Dusty once upon a time, but never really considered him a must have. Didn't look at any other players out of last night's game so can't complain that I 'didn't get their scores, oh the sliding door closed in my face, damn what a stupid decision etc'
Menadue on the mid bench with the E, so Balic could have a look at his score and allow VC Ablett to be awesome if required.
Kerridge on the field in the forwards - he has to play on the field imo.
So, all in all a reasonable start (like most others).
Had Gibbs all pre-season, although I wanted him at M7. When I couldn't get that (even after I moved Shaw on for Bartel to allow for more expensive rookies like Weithering
), out he went. Shame after his score last night, but the logic and the reasons stay the same for me - expected him to score around the 100-105 mark and give me a step if I needed one, but would be the first out if I needed cash (I don't have Libba).Had Dusty once upon a time, but never really considered him a must have. Didn't look at any other players out of last night's game so can't complain that I 'didn't get their scores, oh the sliding door closed in my face, damn what a stupid decision etc'
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 3,525
- Likes
- 5,553
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
As Rowsus has pointed out a few times, it's the handball to kick ratio that gets him. Last night's a great example of why the odds are stacked against him being a good pick. He played phenomenally, and had a big impact on the game, and had 27 possessions (17 contested), and 10 clearances, and he kicked a goal! Still only scored 106. 19 handballs is why.
