Review Round 6: Final Scores

[wogitalia]

2,400 par ?

5 votes out of 50 for 2,400+

View attachment 29115

Par for me is top 1000 so that stacks up about right, I know others use a much more generous par so mine is always on the high end!

Seeing a couple of 2500 scores in my leagues and a few more 2400.

 

[Manikato1]

I think 2400 is too high for par. Plenty of good coaches on this site and only 3 have mentioned 2400 plus. But 2300 for par is still going to damage a lot of other coaches in the 2000 to 2200 bracket.

 

[TommyGobbler]

Rank 395th - scored 2385. Thought I'd move up a bit but looks like a high scoring week so maybe not.

 

[BomberArmy]

2118 - Dunkley (c)
A whole 401pts better than last week, but still miles off it.. 😔

 

[Ben's Beasts]

Rank 395th - scored 2385. Thought I'd move up a bit but looks like a high scoring week so maybe not.

You will 100% move up.

 

[Quasimodo]

2,400 par ?

5 votes out of 50 for 2,400+

View attachment 29115

Would ignore Woggy mate. He has a pretty warped sense of par scores I find.

I expect to at least hold if not improve my top 1K rank with a 2343.

 

[Bermi]

2358 good enough to get me 7 out of 7 League wins.
Actually played the right Rookies on field for a change!

 

[Ironhawk]

Yeah shocking round mate, would hate to have only scored 2,319....

I didn't even get to 2,319. Guess I must have been way below par this week...

(I finished on 2,318).

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Par for me is top 1000 so that stacks up about right, I know others use a much more generous par so mine is always on the high end!

Seeing a couple of 2500 scores in my leagues and a few more 2400.

Maybe give @nicohighscore's work a look then...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386284055067463680

 

[Ricky Bobby]

2253 (Gawn)

 

[Quasimodo]

2358 good enough to get me 7 out of 7 League wins.
Actually played the right Rookies on field for a change!

Clean sweep! Congrats Bermi!

 

[KLo30]

2319 for me, not a good round, looks like 2400 is par this round with some immense variance floating around!

On a positive I've dodged most of the damage, I can't get out of my own way but got lucky with a few of the injuries on guys I genuinely considered trading in.

Wow! WOW

 

[GrainFedBeef]

2319 for me, not a good round, looks like 2400 is par this round with some immense variance floating around!

On a positive I've dodged most of the damage, I can't get out of my own way but got lucky with a few of the injuries on guys I genuinely considered trading in.

Cracking round Wes, amazing really. It better be given you beat me by 17pts in SCS Final Siren! ha ha well done.

Unfortunately I couldn't take Scott's score with all my donuts being medical subs.

 

[Steuby]

Thought I did alright with 2273, you guys obviously did better!

 

[Beg2Differ]

I have Dusty, Gulden, Mansell, Chapman & Rowe all sub 40 too. I really wish I could lament my score of 2300+ as well. Unfortunately I will have to make do with 2124.

 

[frostylane]

2237 - too many low scores under 50. Gawn C.

 

[GrainFedBeef]

Late scale up to 2,302. Project ranking to go up +340 towards 1,360.

Pretty happy given Ridley on the bench and downgraded Clarke to bring in a premium this week. Danger to Walsh worked out ok week 1.

No Dusty missing next week, Neale traded already, only Dunkley to trade.

Agree daily team updates is frustrating, more impacts rookie decisions. Injuries more about protecting trades right now.

Cripps could soon be top 8 the way this is going!

 

[Maso]

2230 took a donut in fwd line didn’t want to compromise my trades , teams coming along lost my important leagues closely but only lost 100 or so rank spots .

 

[lavenderbandit]

2,023. Lowest score for the year, and apparently I did my first upgrade this week to Neale

Looks like I not only have the wrong players, but the wrong strategy too. Gonna be a long year, let's hope I keep interested.

 

[tso]

2225 Macrae