Actually I remember reading something on here a while back about ineffective and effective and it had something to do with the distance, I think it was 40m? So maybe over 40m and it is just considered an ineffective kick and not a Clanger, so 0 points.
you are right I remember something like that as well about distances.
so many variables and different scoring actions.
he is not the only player that is treated differently
would have thought a clanger is a mistake or a error.
but as I don't work for CD or score the game I have no idea to be honest.
will just watch the game and enjoy listening to BT's dribble , although he did make sense that the umpires take too long waiting for the rucks , keep the ball moving , clear up the congestion