Mate, if you go with Flynn at R2 then you must have some seriously big cajones
Gawn plays his favourite teams historically to start with.
Stats courtesy of
@Connoisseur :-
RD1: Avg VS Freo since 2015: 136.2 from 5
RD2: Avg VS StK since 2015: 118 from 11
RD3: Avg VS GWS since 2015: 135.17 from 6
RD4: Avg VS Geel since 2015: 103.57 from 7
RD5: Avg VS Haw since 2015: 141.4 from 5
RD6: Avg VS Rich since 2015: 150.6 from 5
RD7: Avg VS NM since 2015: 138.4 from 5
Last 3 matches against each side:
132+151+151
135+133+126
150+149+156
141+116+93
185+127+112
163+134+145
212+117+111
= 139.95 from 21 (1/21 below 100, 16/21 120+, 7/21 150+)
So effectively, if he starts with a bang, sustains his huge scoring v these teams, you are going to be well behind the pack chasing tail.
You can't win SC with your starting side but you can certainly put yourself out of the running by taking too much risk - I feel no Gawn is taking too much risk personally.
On Danger, the way he looked & with Cameron now at the cats so set to play majority midfield time, I think he is a must have.
With Lloyd missing on the weekend with a knee issue & being overpriced (how much does Campbell being in the team effect him/ does Dawson take more kick ins this year?) , I think downgrading him to free up the cash to get Danger in is the way to go.
Sorry if that sounds a little harsh but I wanted to give you an honest appraisal of your team - you have put so much valuable time & effort into reviewing all the games for everyone here that you deserve critical feedback (after all these years I know you are a big boy & can take criticism lol). Just would hate to see your team really struggle in the early stages by not starting Gawn & Danger - if both do start slowly then yes you would be laughing but I would be backing both in myself.
Just my thoughts anyway