News Injuries & Suspensions

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,130
Likes
64,893
AFL Club
Melbourne
I think it is time for the SuperCoach organisers to get their thinking caps and come up with a better solution to injuries, suspensions and byes. Surely they are capable of more than “I know….let’s give them extra trades”.

My suggestion would be to be able to buy a trade or rent a player. How interesting would it be if an injury, suspension or bye affected player could be replaced with another player worth say $100k less. It would convert the biggest turn-off(s) of the game into something of great opportunity and interest; less ghost ships and people leaving the game and more clicks; win, win, win.
Totally agree. I've been saying for years, that trades need to be monetised.
Incorporate it into the starting budget. Buy your starting team, buy your starting trades.
Start with say a budget of $16,000,000 and trades valued at $250,000.
Trades can be sold back at 90% of their current purchase price.
The purchase price of a trade slowly deteriorates as the season progresses, until in the last Round they cost something like $100,000.
Some will say $100,000 is too cheap, but picture this scenario:
Last Round of the season, you have no trades, and virtually no money. You get an injury to a $550,000 Prem. You can now replace him, but because the trade cost you $100,000, you can only afford a $450,000 player.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2020
Messages
2,370
Likes
12,058
AFL Club
Essendon
I think it is time for the SuperCoach organisers to get their thinking caps and come up with a better solution to injuries, suspensions and byes. Surely they are capable of more than “I know….let’s give them extra trades”.

My suggestion would be to be able to buy a trade or rent a player. How interesting would it be if an injury, suspension or bye affected player could be replaced with another player worth say $100k less. It would convert the biggest turn-off(s) of the game into something of great opportunity and interest; less ghost ships and people leaving the game and more clicks; win, win, win.
I get the frustration but I have a slightly different view and that is that us players maybe need to change our mindset. 35 trades is plenty but everyone has become accustomed to getting full premium teams by the bye and trading so aggressively. Look at Oliver.. the prevailing sentiment was he had to be traded despite a lot of uncertainty and the chance he’s back soon. Similarly, how many times was someone shut down for wanting to sideways Roberts to a playing rookie.

We aggressively chase the best 22 players and then lament the lack of cover when some of them miss, instead of having the best squad.

I know a lot of the winners have come from trading aggressively from the get go, but I would say for every winner there would be plenty of ghost ships created.

My last point is the rookie and captain loophole. So often people complain about a loophole being ruined by a late in/late out but they forget loopholing is playing hard to get an edge. You chase max points at the cost of cover/depth.

Anyway totally feel the frustration and get the angst and limitations. I just think the fans won’t dramatically change so it’s up to us to adapt.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2020
Messages
4,896
Likes
13,334
AFL Club
Collingwood
HAWTHORN skipper James Sicily and his former Hawks teammate Jaeger O'Meara have both been handed one-match bans for rough conduct.

Sicily has been cited for his bump on St Kilda's Anthony Caminiti in Hawthorn's upset win over St Kilda at Marvel Stadium, with the incident assessed as careless, high contact and medium impact.
The Hawks will Surely Appeal. Even in slow motion nothing in it.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2020
Messages
4,896
Likes
13,334
AFL Club
Collingwood
Joined
24 Feb 2020
Messages
4,896
Likes
13,334
AFL Club
Collingwood
Bittersweet pill then, Held Constable all the way through! Was hoping for more output from Atkins for these 2 weeks though!

I had that feeling with his Hammy, played the game out, was training again on the Monday after, it just felt like a wait and see for a week at least?
I'm thinking not this week but should be ready to go for the Kings Birthday match v Collingwood?

Well they have lost the family club tag, so maybe they are working with being the honorable club, respect the rules comp club :p
Yeah this is society, even though you have done nothing, wrong accept that you have, take your punushment, and move on.

You know just stay silent, no need to defend your self. And thats all Sicily was doing, poisition the right arm to absorb the bump.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2020
Messages
4,896
Likes
13,334
AFL Club
Collingwood
Crows likely to appeal :-

Clubs are rising up against the MRO’s crackdown on sling tackles with three appeals lodged from the weekend’s rounds.

There is growing angst around the league about match review officer Michael Christian’s willingness to hand out one-week suspensions with four players nabbed this round, the latest being Adelaide star Rory Laird.

Laird, who was best-on-ground in Sunday’s win over Brisbane, is the 20th player this season to be suspended for a dumping tackle.

He was pinged for driving Brownlow Medallist Lachie Neale into the turf in the third quarter.

Carlton, Sydney and Fremantle will roll the dice at the tribunal on Tuesday night, appealing Christian’s classification of a hard tackle.

The Crows are also likely to appeal with a final call to be made on Tuesday morning

👏
Club memebrs and supporters can accept a suspension for obvious rules infringments, but getting a week for a ball and all tackle has us scrating the head.

Memberr pay ther hard earn to see the club marque players display their skills each week not get a week for a great tackle. The head coach and line coaches need to confront the AFL about this madness and demand it stops.
 
Joined
3 May 2017
Messages
2,684
Likes
8,886
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Totally agree. I've been saying for years, that trades need to be monetised.
Incorporate it into the starting budget. Buy your starting team, buy your starting trades.
Start with say a budget of $16,000,000 and trades valued at $250,000.
Trades can be sold back at 90% of their current purchase price.
The purchase price of a trade slowly deteriorates as the season progresses, until in the last Round they cost something like $100,000.
Some will say $100,000 is too cheap, but picture this scenario:
Last Round of the season, you have no trades, and virtually no money. You get an injury to a $550,000 Prem. You can now replace him, but because the trade cost you $100,000, you can only afford a $450,000 player.
With 16m I’m buying an ultra premo team! Game over! Suggest going back to 20 or 24 trades with extra purchased for a cost, later in season.
 
Joined
21 Jan 2016
Messages
8,417
Likes
31,963
AFL Club
Collingwood
Totally agree. I've been saying for years, that trades need to be monetised.
Incorporate it into the starting budget. Buy your starting team, buy your starting trades.
Start with say a budget of $16,000,000 and trades valued at $250,000.
Trades can be sold back at 90% of their current purchase price.
The purchase price of a trade slowly deteriorates as the season progresses, until in the last Round they cost something like $100,000.
Some will say $100,000 is too cheap, but picture this scenario:
Last Round of the season, you have no trades, and virtually no money. You get an injury to a $550,000 Prem. You can now replace him, but because the trade cost you $100,000, you can only afford a $450,000 player.
I like the word 'monetised', as I see SuperCoach as a 'Stock Exchange Game', instead of trading underperforming Companies to potentially better performing Companies, we are using AFL Players instead.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,626
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I'm actually interested to know if there has been much research done on this from an AFL perspective, or if it is all from other sports. I know it has been researched in other sports (notably NFL), where the expected impacts are different, but haven't seen anything specific to AFL.

Not expecting there would be a lot of difference in the results, but NFL impacts (where a lot of research has been done) are more often helmet to helmet, AFL is more often body/ground to head contact and different impact angles. Obviously different helmet types in the two sports too.
Looks like I have some homework. ;)

I can recall the following article: https://tinyurl.com/yck5aec7 containing a link to an article on the study of junior players.

Can protect skull bone from fracturing and cauliflower ears but no help in stopping the brain tissue from moving inside the skull.

Likely to have more involvement from country/junior/etc levels than the AFL in any studies.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2...two-year-research-project-into-players-health
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2...eview-finds-it-produced-no-published-research
 
Top