Discussion 2023 Round 13: Teams & In Game Discussion

What was your final score?

  • Less than 1900

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1900 - 1949

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 1950 - 1999

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2000 - 2049

    Votes: 6 6.9%
  • 2050 - 2099

    Votes: 11 12.6%
  • 2100 - 2149

    Votes: 23 26.4%
  • 2150 - 2199

    Votes: 30 34.5%
  • 2200 - 2249

    Votes: 15 17.2%
  • 2250 - 2299

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • More than 2300

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    87

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,137
Likes
64,910
AFL Club
Melbourne
There would be a lot less stoppages. However in a contested ball situation players would either take the risk of possession or move the ball on quicker (punch tap kick) which makes the game faster and will in attacking situation cause more goals. Both of which the AFL has been manipulating the rules for years to try and achieve.

It is ironic that the AFL wishes to encourage players to take possession when in many instances this leads to a stoppage -which they have been trying to get rid of for years.
I see what you're saying, but right now, the very best stoppages are tap, to quick hands out to a running player, kick inside 50. Let's encourage more quick hands, fast ball movement. First to the ball will still be advantageous, as long as you have numbers, and quick hands. Coaches who coach a be 2nd and tackle the player that gets the ball type strategy will quickly get out coached!!!
 
Joined
25 Feb 2019
Messages
8,836
Likes
14,280
AFL Club
Hawthorn
J. Daicos 2 big 1st quarters in his last 2 games and then the next 3 quarters not sighted, which he ended with 2 scores in the 60s, glad I turfed him for Action Jackson this week
 
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Messages
5,465
Likes
11,297
AFL Club
Adelaide
About 5 times today, we've seen guys standing up in the tackle, ball held to them, but they're still trying to run, to break the tackle. No attempt to get rid of it. That should negate prior opportunity. Free kick for holding the ball. If you don't pay the free 2 things happen. You're giving the guy with the ball 2 bites at the cherry. Or you're basically forcing the tackler to sling him, or drag him to ground heavily.
How about this?
Get rid of no prior opportunity. Every single tackle that causes a stoppage results in a free kick. Illegal tackles penalized, all others rewarded. Result? Players will dispose of the ball more, and more quickly. A lot less stoppages. Game more open and free flowing, which is what just about every rule change in the past 10 years has wanted to achieve!!!
Agree, players are talented enough to dispose of the ball quickly. The whole holding the ball rule has been a debacle for years now, and probably attributed to some concussions.
 
Top