Opinion 2024 AFL SuperCoach Planning Thread

Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
Surely SC will start round 1 , round zero is irrelevant?
If that is the case you would want to try to not pick many players that play round zero because they will end up having 2 byes during the season proper compared to those that don't play round zero only having 1 bye during the season proper.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,856
Likes
12,117
AFL Club
West Coast
If that is the case you would want to try to not pick many players that play round zero because they will end up having 2 byes during the season proper compared to those that don't play round zero only having 1 bye during the season proper.
My 2 cents worth is, if they proceed with the Round Zero playing these two games early, and on the provisio that these teams then all have a bye later on in the same round, then both the Round Zero games and all games on the weekend the Round Zero teams have a bye are non scoring SC rounds. We would lose in total one round of scoring for the season but at least then everyone one is on equal footing.

It would be almost impossible for example to pick rookies if Round Zero was a scoring round and you needed to field a SC team. Even if SC gave you a free hit after Round Zero where you could completely repick your entire team without penalty, there probably would not be enough playing rookies or cheap players across those four clubs to create a full squad within the salary cap.

It will be a mess whichever way they run it if the Round Zero idea goes ahead.
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,279
Likes
53,549
AFL Club
North Melb.
My 2 cents worth is, if they proceed with the Round Zero playing these two games early, and on the provisio that these teams then all have a bye later on in the same round, then both the Round Zero games and all games on the weekend the Round Zero teams have a bye are non scoring SC rounds. We would lose in total one round of scoring for the season but at least then everyone one is on equal footing.

It would be almost impossible for example to pick rookies if Round Zero was a scoring round and you needed to field a SC team. Even if SC gave you a free hit after Round Zero where you could completely repick your entire team without penalty, there probably would not be enough playing rookies or cheap players across those four clubs to create a full squad within the salary cap.

It will be a mess whichever way they run it if the Round Zero idea goes ahead.
4 games, 8 clubs.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,856
Likes
12,117
AFL Club
West Coast
4 games, 8 clubs.
The article I had read had two games in Sydney. GWS-Collingwood and Sydney-Melbourne. But either way my thought process on including/excluding scoring in those rounds is the same.
 
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
I think the set up may be as follows for the zero round and how it will effect Supercoach -

1/ The aero round will not go towards the year scoring for Supercoach Scoring for the season will start round 1.
2/ All teams that don't play the zero round will have only 1 more bye during the season however, the teams that play zero round will have 2 byes.
3/ All remaining bye rounds (not including zero round) will be best scoring 18.

The other option could be they start the comp at the start including the sero round and make it the best scoring 18 as all other bye rounds and they allow you to fix your team with only adding/removing players from tema that didn't play during the zero round.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2020
Messages
2,586
Likes
13,220
AFL Club
Essendon
I feel like the simplest solution is round 0 and round 1 are one long round. Advantage of an upfront double for some teams is o***et by the additional bye. Allows some interesting strategy and also doesn’t over complicate things. If round 0 is excluded, it makes rolling BE and price rises a challenge. And any other option is probably too exotic.

For me, the worst scenario would be round 0 counts and you have to make a team from a limited set. Massively compromises team selection and inevitably leads to a team stacked with players with a bye shortly thereafter.
 
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
I feel like the simplest solution is round 0 and round 1 are one long round. Advantage of an upfront double for some teams is o***et by the additional bye. Allows some interesting strategy and also doesn’t over complicate things. If round 0 is excluded, it makes rolling BE and price rises a challenge. And any other option is probably too exotic.

For me, the worst scenario would be round 0 counts and you have to make a team from a limited set. Massively compromises team selection and inevitably leads to a team stacked with players with a bye shortly thereafter.
That sounds like a fair solution as long as you can change players in/out of your team from the teams that didn't play in the zero round.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2020
Messages
2,586
Likes
13,220
AFL Club
Essendon
That sounds like a fair solution as long as you can change players in/out of your team from the teams that didn't play in the zero round.
In what way? I’d imagine all those teams would lock out after that first game but the rest be a rolling lockout. Can’t see you being able to change players after they’ve played round 0 or it becomes too compromised.
 
Joined
28 Aug 2023
Messages
305
Likes
1,145
AFL Club
Essendon
My 2 cents worth is, if they proceed with the Round Zero playing these two games early, and on the provisio that these teams then all have a bye later on in the same round, then both the Round Zero games and all games on the weekend the Round Zero teams have a bye are non scoring SC rounds. We would lose in total one round of scoring for the season but at least then everyone one is on equal footing.

It would be almost impossible for example to pick rookies if Round Zero was a scoring round and you needed to field a SC team. Even if SC gave you a free hit after Round Zero where you could completely repick your entire team without penalty, there probably would not be enough playing rookies or cheap players across those four clubs to create a full squad within the salary cap.

It will be a mess whichever way they run it if the Round Zero idea goes ahead.
This is the best solution I've seen imo, nothing is perfect but this feels the least complicated
 
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
In what way? I’d imagine all those teams would lock out after that first game but the rest be a rolling lockout. Can’t see you being able to change players after they’ve played round 0 or it becomes too compromised.
I agree. I'm saying you can change your team around for the players that didn't play zero round. Players that you select that play zero round would be locked in and can't be changed while you finalise your team for end of round 1.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2020
Messages
2,586
Likes
13,220
AFL Club
Essendon
I agree. I'm saying you can change your team around for the players that didn't play zero round. Players that you select that play zero round would be locked in and can't be changed while you finalise your team for end of round 1.
Ah two I get you. Agreed, rolling lockout for the other teams. You just wear the pain if a round zero player misses round 1.
 
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
Ah two I get you. Agreed, rolling lockout for the other teams. You just wear the pain if a round zero player misses round 1.
There actually wouldn't be much of a benefit picking players that play round zero unless you think they will be a must have e.g. Daicos if he's a defender. The only players I'm considering from the 8 teams playing the zero round would be Grundy, N Daicos if a defender, possibly Touk Miller and maybe Oliver/Gawn (not including possible rookies).
 
Last edited:
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
663
Likes
1,960
AFL Club
Collingwood
Why couldn't the AFL have the zero round player as a split round for round 1? This way all 18 teams play over the fortnight and it wouldn't create any issues with byes nor Supercoach. Or the smarter option would be to play all games for all 18 teams on the weekend they plan on starting zero round and call it round 1!
 
Joined
22 Oct 2014
Messages
8,226
Likes
43,589
AFL Club
North Melb.
Why couldn't the AFL have the zero round player as a split round for round 1? This way all 18 teams play over the fortnight and it wouldn't create any issues with byes nor Supercoach. Or the smarter option would be to play all games for all 18 teams on the weekend they plan on starting zero round and call it round 1!
This would be the logical thing to do however I think the AFL would be concerned that week 2 would feel a bit hollow with only 5 games being played. I think they want the double boost of round zero in the northern states and an uncompromised round 1 in the traditional footy states. I can understand their thinking here.

As I have posted previously to me the best solution is to allow everybody to pick their best team for round zero from the teams that are participating and then allow unlimited trades for round 1 so everybody can set up their starting teams as normal. Rather than just making the best of a bad situation I think this would actually be pretty exciting.
 
Joined
23 Feb 2021
Messages
790
Likes
2,498
AFL Club
Adelaide
This, Soldo should be a forward, without a discount he's more interesting, with a discount he's probably just about a lock if he clearly wins the #1 spot. Given how much more they paid for him than Sweet it's probably a decent indicator who they rank higher. Not sure I personally agree with that though, I liked what I saw from Sweet more than Soldo has shown.

Worth noting that Port still have Lycett, Hayes, Visentini and Finlayson on top of Dixon who could also go back to ruck if Lord, Marshall and Georgiades can do what they want from them forward as Dixon played by far his best football as a ruck, I don't expect that though.
Sorry to be harsh, but Soldo selection has never won SC for anyone,
 
Top