Strategy 2024: Round 4 Trades
- Thread starter Tamuhawk
- Start date
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 1,229
- Likes
- 3,129
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Some really interesting discussion on the merits of LDU > Green over the past couple of pages. I’d be relying on Sexton getting dropped to open up funds but don’t love that it would be a boost. Gonna see what teams present tonight before making a decision. Having all boosts in hand after this week could be lovely come upgrade season.
- Joined
- 7 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 12,069
- Likes
- 42,460
Yeh doesn't look appealing for a few of those.
Brisbane has Payne out of form and Carlton without a 2nd KPD can leak goals, like last season when he played on Young for 149 points.
The play would be to down to a big one vs Bulldogs then going into North.
Looking beyond the six you mention is very appealing and may be cheap before those fixtures.
Brisbane has Payne out of form and Carlton without a 2nd KPD can leak goals, like last season when he played on Young for 149 points.
The play would be to down to a big one vs Bulldogs then going into North.
Looking beyond the six you mention is very appealing and may be cheap before those fixtures.
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2016
- Messages
- 892
- Likes
- 2,084
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Are there any stats available on likely KPF changes at round 6?
Tossing up between bringing in Steele or Flanders. Leaning Flanders given he's a higher certainty to finish top 6-8 in his position, but it'll mean closing my mid-fwd loop in the short term, which I think I'll be okay with.
For some reason I have in my head that Sanders will likely gain FWD
Tossing up between bringing in Steele or Flanders. Leaning Flanders given he's a higher certainty to finish top 6-8 in his position, but it'll mean closing my mid-fwd loop in the short term, which I think I'll be okay with.
For some reason I have in my head that Sanders will likely gain FWD
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 4,259
- Likes
- 7,602
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
My Team post first two trades of this week (Coffield -> Draper, Jordon -> Darcy).
Thinking I may use the boost. What do people think about the following options:
Howes -> Whitfield (95k Bank)
Marshall -> English (340k Bank)
Windsor -> L.Jackson (75k Bank)
Windsor -> H.Thomas (482k Bank (Thomas -52 BE compared to Windsor 33 BE (85 difference and a 104 in the cycle for another week for Thomas).
Windsor -> T.Green (via D.Wilson) (3k in bank)
I think I really like one of the last two trades as it would give me the following team for this week and then I would just need to really push to upgrade forwards when clear top 6 forwards become clear.
Happy to hear any other thoughts too.
Thinking I may use the boost. What do people think about the following options:
Howes -> Whitfield (95k Bank)
Marshall -> English (340k Bank)
Windsor -> L.Jackson (75k Bank)
Windsor -> H.Thomas (482k Bank (Thomas -52 BE compared to Windsor 33 BE (85 difference and a 104 in the cycle for another week for Thomas).
Windsor -> T.Green (via D.Wilson) (3k in bank)
I think I really like one of the last two trades as it would give me the following team for this week and then I would just need to really push to upgrade forwards when clear top 6 forwards become clear.
Happy to hear any other thoughts too.
Touch and go for Sanders - this is from the herald sun articles thread
Ryley Sanders
Midfield 62%
Forward 38%
While most of us have been fixated on Luke Beveridge going full Bevo and subbing out Sanders and Tom Liberatore in the first three rounds, the Bulldogs coach might gift us the No.6 draft as a FWD-MID. Sanders is on the borderline of the 35 per cent threshold and will be a big watch in coming weeks.
Ryley Sanders
Midfield 62%
Forward 38%
While most of us have been fixated on Luke Beveridge going full Bevo and subbing out Sanders and Tom Liberatore in the first three rounds, the Bulldogs coach might gift us the No.6 draft as a FWD-MID. Sanders is on the borderline of the 35 per cent threshold and will be a big watch in coming weeks.
Not much discussion in here on the merits of bringing in Bramble this week.
Even after his initial price rise to 347K, he can still be a viable cash cow if he continues to average 90+
More importantly though, he would replace a Sexton/Sam Darcy on field (through DPP) for me. So even if he falls short of a 90 average, he may still provide significant benefit with improved on field scoring over a F6 rookie.
The 10 kick-ins he’s taken over the first 3 weeks (played on from all) is the most enticing part about Bramble and certainly helps bolster his scoring.
Thoughts?
Even after his initial price rise to 347K, he can still be a viable cash cow if he continues to average 90+
More importantly though, he would replace a Sexton/Sam Darcy on field (through DPP) for me. So even if he falls short of a 90 average, he may still provide significant benefit with improved on field scoring over a F6 rookie.
The 10 kick-ins he’s taken over the first 3 weeks (played on from all) is the most enticing part about Bramble and certainly helps bolster his scoring.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 19,071
- Likes
- 80,327
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Joined
- 22 Jun 2023
- Messages
- 409
- Likes
- 1,889
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Ah okay I get you. I'm in a position where I can freely move Hore/Reid to Darcy through a DPP swing with Yeo.
It's 50k extra to grab LDU but I can do it now. Do you think I should grab him now and worry about who my M6-8 will be later? I genuinely believe Green could be M1-M2 this year and $650k for him doesn't seem too outrageous, but I know a down game will come - just don't know when.
It's 50k extra to grab LDU but I can do it now. Do you think I should grab him now and worry about who my M6-8 will be later? I genuinely believe Green could be M1-M2 this year and $650k for him doesn't seem too outrageous, but I know a down game will come - just don't know when.
