- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,960
- Likes
- 126,628
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Questions are rhetorical and meant to get others to stop and think whilst ideally being helpful. It is not solely limited and not directed to who I am responding to as the same questions could be posed to anyone or someone that may post a similar thing later in the season, etc. I am not expecting answers to the question nor is there an answer or a right answer.
In relation to par, I can respond to any par question for the remainder of the season with the answer yes and I gather it is unlikely I will be pushed to provide further and solid reasoning for coming to that conclusion. If I answer no, then I gather I will be asked. Those asking the question want to hear one answer, so we may as well give them what they want. The point I am trying to make with the line of “questioning” is what credibility or validity does it hold and is it worthy of being preoccupied and worried about when the answer will be provided in less than 24 hours. It could change within that time if an injury occurs to a popular player, a late out, a poor performance, etc. Too many occasions you see people worry on a Saturday and then come Sunday night receive a green arrow and thus there was no point ever concerning themselves.
In reference to entitled to their own opinions, this is why I pose the question. Someone might define par similar to yourself, someone else may feel it means something else and so on. There could be an incongruence between their definition, rank, goal, etc. Fix that and it becomes a much more enjoyable experience. My preference was to rely on a resource such as nico’s if I was concerned about par whereas now without I don’t care.
In relation to par, I can respond to any par question for the remainder of the season with the answer yes and I gather it is unlikely I will be pushed to provide further and solid reasoning for coming to that conclusion. If I answer no, then I gather I will be asked. Those asking the question want to hear one answer, so we may as well give them what they want. The point I am trying to make with the line of “questioning” is what credibility or validity does it hold and is it worthy of being preoccupied and worried about when the answer will be provided in less than 24 hours. It could change within that time if an injury occurs to a popular player, a late out, a poor performance, etc. Too many occasions you see people worry on a Saturday and then come Sunday night receive a green arrow and thus there was no point ever concerning themselves.
In reference to entitled to their own opinions, this is why I pose the question. Someone might define par similar to yourself, someone else may feel it means something else and so on. There could be an incongruence between their definition, rank, goal, etc. Fix that and it becomes a much more enjoyable experience. My preference was to rely on a resource such as nico’s if I was concerned about par whereas now without I don’t care.
, Jackson 72 
