Discussion BBL|14 Teams & In Game Discussion

[Rowsus]

Rowsus: 2/312 - Overton - 7 SI = 45/SI

Wife: 3/323 - Overton - 8 SI = 40/SI

Rowsus: 5/470 - Overton - 11 SI = 43/SI

Very late decision of trading O'Neill out, and Jhye back in looking now!
I just had a hunch Jhye would play 2, and if not give 40-60 from playing 1.

Wife: 4/530 - Overton - 11 SI = 48/SI

 

[Ben's Beasts]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870734115877871904

View: https://twitter.com/HeatBBL/status/1870734115877871904

 

[Beg2Differ]

Absolutely would have had Inglis in my team (over Morris) if I knew he was playing both.

 

[Ben's Beasts]

No Banton with Prestwidge a late inclusion into the squad and XI.

 

[Herbie66]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870734115877871904

View: https://twitter.com/HeatBBL/status/1870734115877871904

No Banton 😱

Interesting Prestwidge wasn't in their original Squad announcement

 

[Tex]

Absolutely would have had Inglis in my team (over Morris) if I knew he was playing both.

I think most would of picked Inglis if we knew he was playing both games. The challenges of the BBL 🙂

 

[Rowsus]

No Banton with Prestwidge a late inclusion into the squad and XI.

Which is proof that the named Squads mean ........ squat!

 

[Ben's Beasts]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870735745985495244

View: https://twitter.com/7Cricket/status/1870735745985495244

 

[Herbie66]

Which is proof that the named Squads mean ........ squat!

Much prefer them naming 13-14 than what they were all doing the last few seasons and basically naming everyone who was available

 

[Herbie66]

Boyce , Overton , Thornton

Peirson

 

[Under The Dome]

Scott 1 point more than Richardson with a 2nd game

 

[Rowsus]

Scott picked as a specialist No.7 Bat?

Bowled one over last game, and they wouldn't even give him a 2nd over when the opposition needed something like 35 off the last over!!!

 

[Pacifico]

if squads meant anything they would have had to bring in a like for like replacement rather than a bowling alrounder.

 

[Jay Sea]

Alright, looks like I’m going Wood to Pierson.

 

[blue dreamer]

B

I am leaning towards this as JFM only averages 8.6 against Perth with a high of 35 and has a BE of 71, even if I can't get Bantons score it saves me from losing more cash with JFM and gives me the WK cover I will need for next round.

Banton not playing shelves this plan.
JFM must be due 😋

 

[Kennedy]

Probably been mentioned a million times by everyone but yeah... initially traded out Tye > Inglis last minute then changed again from Inglis > Morris due to Inglis not playing a 2nd game. Lead balloon

 

[Tamuhawk]

Scott picked as a specialist No.7 Bat?

Bowled one over last game, and they wouldn't even give him a 2nd over when the opposition needed something like 35 off the last over!!!

Don't forget his teammate Bazley the specialist bat/fielder at 8 who bowled 0 overs last game. 🤣

 

[Chumpion]

So much for going early on Doggett before the double.. didn’t even play 1 let alone 2 🙄

 

[Ironhawk]

So much for going early on Doggett before the double.. didn’t even play 1 let alone 2 🙄

Semi glad he didn't play tonight, as I have a reasonable bench score. Disappointing I could have brought someone else in though.

 

[Hunter]

Missed lockout yesterday, meant to trade Doran in to get Harper's score and make VC Overton C. Now traded in Banton to get Harper's score and riding with Connolly C.