And while on the subject of KI stats I was looking at some of these a while back and I was using Wheelo Ratings as they listed % numbers as well. I found however that some of their stats appeared to be incorrect. Not sure if there is an error in the calc or my interpretation of their stats.
They listed % as KI/Total KI.
Take Port. They listed KI% for Farrell 37.9, Burton at 37.3, and Houston 36.4. Well that totals over 100% without adding on the other players that took the odd one. The table showed games played and ave KI per game and they matched up correctly. EG Houston played 22 games at 3.6 for 80 KI total. Port had total 267 KI so Houston at 80 KI equals 29.9% by my reckoning. And Farrell was 31.8% and Burton 22%
I am either missing something (eg the stat is not calced the way I thought it was or it means something else) or it is incorrect. Wanted to contact Wheelo to clarify but they have no contact point other than X which I do not use.
They listed % as KI/Total KI.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12e65/12e65df5ee2b047cbb49a90865c3086995dfd1b6" alt="1739252468553.png"
Take Port. They listed KI% for Farrell 37.9, Burton at 37.3, and Houston 36.4. Well that totals over 100% without adding on the other players that took the odd one. The table showed games played and ave KI per game and they matched up correctly. EG Houston played 22 games at 3.6 for 80 KI total. Port had total 267 KI so Houston at 80 KI equals 29.9% by my reckoning. And Farrell was 31.8% and Burton 22%
I am either missing something (eg the stat is not calced the way I thought it was or it means something else) or it is incorrect. Wanted to contact Wheelo to clarify but they have no contact point other than X which I do not use.