LOL - funny thing was I was thinking about this the other day.
Strangely, I was more thinking of when Swans was 17-1 for the premiership after they had a shocking start. Bit annoyed I didn't put a $50 (or at least a $20) at 17-1. At the time, I thought wow geez those are generous odds, but thought perhaps the odds were correct.
Then I was watching the Swans the other day and thought they were very dominate (against Cats, I think) and probably deserved now to be favourites. I was more thinking of Tom Mitchell and O'Keefe not being able to get a game at the Swans when they would be walk-up starter for most AFL clubs.
Then for some reason my mind focused on Ablett and Dangerfield and who would be a perfect fit for the Swans. Ablett is obviously a better player, but the Swans have good midfielders, and thus I decided that Dangerfield would be a better fit for the Swans than Ablett.
Not sure how my mind got from Sydney being 17-1 to Dangerfield being a better fit for the Swans (than Ablett);
Sorry Drew; LOL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Dangerfield is probably a better fit to the Swans than Ablett
Hasn't Dangerfield re-signed recently?