Opinion Player X vs Player Y
- Thread starter yakka
- Start date
Rockliff by an absolute mile. Averaged 132 in 2014.
Ideally neither (there are plenty of better value mids in my view). Beams to average higher but play fewer games - Gray probably the better starting pick as a result.
Yeo for me, I'm hoping he plays more in the mids and continues to improve.
Agree with Nathan on Wines v Barlow as well.
Ideally neither (there are plenty of better value mids in my view). Beams to average higher but play fewer games - Gray probably the better starting pick as a result.
Yeo for me, I'm hoping he plays more in the mids and continues to improve.
Agree with Nathan on Wines v Barlow as well.
Last edited:
Great question - Hibberd looks a good pick if he can bounce back, I just have no specific reason to think he will.
Simpson is in my side and is basically always a solid choice, but I'd be open to Hibberd if the reason for his poor scoring was identified/resolved. I see a couple of people over here think he can bounce back (although not the Bomber fan!):
http://www.supercoachscores.com/threads/2793-2016-Predictions-Top-Averaging-Players-Positions
Simpson is in my side and is basically always a solid choice, but I'd be open to Hibberd if the reason for his poor scoring was identified/resolved. I see a couple of people over here think he can bounce back (although not the Bomber fan!):
http://www.supercoachscores.com/threads/2793-2016-Predictions-Top-Averaging-Players-Positions
Last edited:
Ideally none. That would require enough low priced rookies available, which is what we wish is available each year, and that they don't get injured early like last year. Otherwise you could consider one.
Otherwise in order:
* Wells, as his history is a 92.4 career average. Furthermore, as an established player he has the trust of the playing group which the others don't have given their game numbers. He must average 85+ as a minimum but more like 90 to be worthwhile.
* Anderson, as contested ball and inside 50s increase his scoring potential. North don't have Supercoach stars for long periods, especially youngsters. Goldstein excepted. He must average 85 minimum to be worthwhile.
* Kennedy and Menzel. I'd much rather a lower priced rookie. Again they need to average 80+ to be worthwhile.
Otherwise in order:
* Wells, as his history is a 92.4 career average. Furthermore, as an established player he has the trust of the playing group which the others don't have given their game numbers. He must average 85+ as a minimum but more like 90 to be worthwhile.
* Anderson, as contested ball and inside 50s increase his scoring potential. North don't have Supercoach stars for long periods, especially youngsters. Goldstein excepted. He must average 85 minimum to be worthwhile.
* Kennedy and Menzel. I'd much rather a lower priced rookie. Again they need to average 80+ to be worthwhile.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
hmm tough one..i with row about houli..he will be around 85-90 player. i think your paying overs for him right at this point.
mcdonald and kk i dont know. for me its a wait and see.
there hasnt been alot of talk about hibberd. he had a poor season last year but he is normally around 90-95 player. i would expect him to be about that this season.
simo is consistent sc scorer.
if i was playing safe it will be simo, kk, hibberd and mcdonald.
mcdonald and kk i dont know. for me its a wait and see.
there hasnt been alot of talk about hibberd. he had a poor season last year but he is normally around 90-95 player. i would expect him to be about that this season.
simo is consistent sc scorer.
if i was playing safe it will be simo, kk, hibberd and mcdonald.
