Opinion Player X vs Player Y

[Tamuhawk]

Price not an issue...

Zach Merrett vs. Dayne Zorko vs. Shaun Edwards ???

Zorko... assuming rocky and beams are playing round 1... No

Shaun Edwards from bombers? a hell no. If you mean Shane Titch Edwards from Tigers? I'd say could be a great POD... so a maybe.

Merrett has the pontetial to flourish in an underseiged bombers team.

Out of the 3... Zach Merrett for me.

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Zorko... assuming rocky and beams are playing round 1... No

Shaun Edwards from bombers? a hell no. If you mean Shane Titch Edwards from Tigers? I'd say could be a great POD... so a maybe.

Merrett has the pontetial to flourish in an underseiged bombers team.

Out of the 3... Zach Merrett for me.

Cheers mate, yeah meant Shane Edwards from the Tiges. Geez I'm having a shocker this arvo. Too many late nights lol

 

[Blaze]

Pendles and lobbe v goldy and libba?

Inclined to go the former

 

[PC]

Pendles and lobbe v goldy and libba?

Inclined to go the former

I have a similar question - Libba and NicNat v Rookie and Goldy?

Leaning towards Goldy and Rookie - Libba could very easily have a slow start after his injury, NicNat has back tightness, whereas Goldy may be overpriced but I expect him to be in the top 3 scoring rucks for the year, so I save two trades by starting him.

Thoughts anyone?

 

[BomberSam]

Fyfe, Wines and Seedsman vs. Sloane, Jelwood and Hurn?

EDIT: vs. Selwood, Wines and Yeo?

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Fyfe, Wines and Seedsman vs. Sloane, Jelwood and Hurn?

EDIT: vs. Selwood, Wines and Yeo?

Not sold on Selwood due to preseason injury concerns, and concern surrounding whether he lines up for round 1. Therefore I'd have Sloane in there if you can instead of him. So preferably I'd say: Sloane + Wines + Yeo. But not sure if that fits in with what you have.

 

[_Slip_]

Fyfe, Libba & Forward rookie vs Priddis, Barlow & mid rookie?

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Fyfe, Libba & Forward rookie vs Priddis, Barlow & mid rookie?

Priddis, Barlow and MID rookie for me tbh. Although even better if you can turn that MID rookie into Libba.

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

I have a similar question - Libba and NicNat v Rookie and Goldy?

Leaning towards Goldy and Rookie - Libba could very easily have a slow start after his injury, NicNat has back tightness, whereas Goldy may be overpriced but I expect him to be in the top 3 scoring rucks for the year, so I save two trades by starting him.

Thoughts anyone?

Nic Nat has back issues, enough to put me off so I'm inclined to go Goldy + Rookie

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

Pendles and lobbe v goldy and libba?

Inclined to go the former

Pendles & Lobbe - 1 keeper
Goldy & Libba - Potentially 2 keepers

At this stage, I would prefer option 2

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

Fyfe, Libba & Forward rookie vs Priddis, Barlow & mid rookie?

Option 2, especially if it's a good MID rookie.
I think Priddis is a good POD choice to have.

 

[Tranterpants]

Haha, yeah no Bird for the moment but he's still "my man"!

Thanks mate, had a great day.

So looked at this again... To see what it looks like with Dangermouse...

Danger, Smith & bottom-priced rooks
v
Top-priced rook, Simpson, Bird & 100k
*Libba in both teams, but can start without him for some extra cash to spread around on rooks. But then must get good growth out of rooks to get anywhere...

 

[Snowman]

So looked at this again... To see what it looks like with Dangermouse...

Danger, Smith & bottom-priced rooks
v
Top-priced rook, Simpson, Bird & 100k
*Libba in both teams, but can start without him for some extra cash to spread around on rooks. But then must get good growth out of rooks to get anywhere...

Danger, Smith & bottom rookie for me

 

[Goodie's Guns]

So looked at this again... To see what it looks like with Dangermouse...

Danger, Smith & bottom-priced rooks
v
Top-priced rook, Simpson, Bird & 100k
*Libba in both teams, but can start without him for some extra cash to spread around on rooks. But then must get good growth out of rooks to get anywhere...

Danger, Smith & bottom rookie for me

Agreed with Tomuhawk, 1 definite keeper plus a potential keeper and a rookie, vs. 1 definite keeper plus Bird who probably will need upgrading, and a rookie.

 

[Tranterpants]

Agreed with Tomuhawk, 1 definite keeper plus a potential keeper and a rookie, vs. 1 definite keeper plus Bird who probably will need upgrading, and a rookie.

Danger, Smith & bottom rookie for me

That's what I'm thinking atm. Gives me Libba at M7.
Thoughts on the need of spare cash though? I've played it with and without a bank to similar results...

 

[bloke]

Shaw + Danger + Parish vs. Laird + Priddis + Greene?

Seems pretty straightforward now I've typed out but what do you reckon?

 

[happydays]

Barlow + Crouch + Aish vs Nicholls + Wines + Hartley/Back Rookie

Any brief comments greatly appreciated.

 

[_Slip_]

Shaw + Danger + Parish vs. Laird + Priddis + Greene?

Seems pretty straightforward now I've typed out but what do you reckon?

Priddis & Laird. Not sure about Greene.

 

[_Slip_]

Priddis, Barlow and MID rookie for me tbh. Although even better if you can turn that MID rookie into Libba.

Option 2, especially if it's a good MID rookie.
I think Priddis is a good POD choice to have.

Thanks Guys I was thinking the same. Love Fyfe but looking at the rookie forwards I am a little concerned with only starting 3 premos and I believe Barlow will be a Top 6 forward whilst Libba is iffy to be a top 10 mid.

 

[Junior Wölf]

Two of Fyfe, Danger, Pendles. I am leaning towards the first two but Fyfe always misses games. Pendles is Mr Consistent.