Opinion Buddy Franklin ($470,100) - Training the house down! :)

Will Buddy Franklin be in your Initial SuperCoach team?

  • Locked

    Votes: 13 14.9%
  • Likely

    Votes: 20 23.0%
  • Watch

    Votes: 30 34.5%
  • Unlikely

    Votes: 17 19.5%
  • No chance

    Votes: 7 8.0%

  • Total voters
    87
Joined
28 Dec 2012
Messages
4,021
Likes
2,719
#61
What about Tom Hawkins in this mould?? Went @ 95 in 2012 with plenty of monster scores. Only tonned up 3 times last year which may have had something to do with Clark arriving. Geelong's softish start to the year having Bris, Ess, GC within the first 6 rounds, also throw GWS in there who probably aren't easy beats any more but a big score is a possibility.
Can he do it with Clark in the side? How will Henderson effect him, did they recruit him as a forward? Will have Danger putting it down their throats!
Henderson will play back.

Hawkins will have (if fit) Vardy and Clarke clogging up the forward line.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,132
Likes
64,897
AFL Club
Melbourne
#62
If I could be a little boring and play devil's advocate, I think this type of move worked brilliantly for Dimma mainly because it was born out of opportunity.

If SJ wasn't ripe for the picking do you remember considering anyone else at the time Dimma? If things had been different do you think Cloke would have stuck around?

I only mention this because I think trying to plan for this type of scenario is really hard to pull off - kind of like the "getting a high priced premo in when they drop" type scenario.

If anyone is picking a Buddy-type stepping stone, I think they need to be prepared to a) be stuck with him or b) potentially trade him out earlier than expected due to his volatility.

If I may, I'd also suggest taking a good look at any potential upgrade targets on advance i.e.: Bennell if he starts slow, so that you have your wits about you at all times.

I like Buddy as a selection either way.
I always like your posts, sven.
I'm in the Buddy camp, and definitely going with option b) from above. If he gets off to a flyer, and hits a ridiculous price, out he goes!
 
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
6,769
Likes
14,766
AFL Club
Fremantle
#63
If I could be a little boring and play devil's advocate, I think this type of move worked brilliantly for Dimma mainly because it was born out of opportunity.

If SJ wasn't ripe for the picking do you remember considering anyone else at the time Dimma? If things had been different do you think Cloke would have stuck around?

I only mention this because I think trying to plan for this type of scenario is really hard to pull off - kind of like the "getting a high priced premo in when they drop" type scenario.

If anyone is picking a Buddy-type stepping stone, I think they need to be prepared to a) be stuck with him or b) potentially trade him out earlier than expected due to his volatility.

If I may, I'd also suggest taking a good look at any potential upgrade targets on advance i.e.: Bennell if he starts slow, so that you have your wits about you at all times.

I like Buddy as a selection either way.
I had a quick look and there was nothing to predict Cloke's start. His 3 big scores were against teams that had finished 1st, 9th and 12th the previous year. His second best of those 3 scores were in a loss and he only averaged 90 in wins the previous year. Total profit of $138,700 and a 114 average so not the cash generation you would like from a cash cow but very handy points on the ground.

The only lock in my forward line is Dusty so I still have time to become a spineless jellyfish. :)
 
Joined
8 Jan 2014
Messages
6,968
Likes
11,084
AFL Club
Melbourne
#64
Please stop posting in this thread guys. You are going to tempt me lol
I've said No Buddy all preseason, but can see myself falling for him again if I'm not careful.
You also see him in your Avatar every time you post....must be some subliminal reinforcement going on there :)
 
Last edited:

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,072
Likes
80,335
AFL Club
Melbourne
#65
For the first time this pre-season I'm on the Buddy bandwagon.

I feel nervous but hopeful.
 

Dimmawit

2013 AFL SuperCoach Winner
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
491
Likes
1,397
AFL Club
Richmond
#69
If I could be a little boring and play devil's advocate, I think this type of move worked brilliantly for Dimma mainly because it was born out of opportunity.

If SJ wasn't ripe for the picking do you remember considering anyone else at the time Dimma? If things had been different do you think Cloke would have stuck around?

I only mention this because I think trying to plan for this type of scenario is really hard to pull off - kind of like the "getting a high priced premo in when they drop" type scenario.

If anyone is picking a Buddy-type stepping stone, I think they need to be prepared to a) be stuck with him or b) potentially trade him out earlier than expected due to his volatility.

If I may, I'd also suggest taking a good look at any potential upgrade targets on advance i.e.: Bennell if he starts slow, so that you have your wits about you at all times.

I like Buddy as a selection either way.
Hey Sven.

You're spot on, it was born out of opportunity. As a player it was my first serious crack at SC that year so really picking Cloke - which now seems like a crazy risky selection! - was done with some naivety. Also true was the fact SJ played his own role in the trade. IF there wasn't an available premium i wanted to trade down to and I certainly don't think I would've sideways traded him. I don't think I even considered anyone else. SJ was that perfectly primed for me to upgrade Cloke (that was definitely how I saw it despite his start to the year) and pocketed $140k. Which allowed me to upgrade Wines (rookie) to Priddis (via 1 wk in Daisy).

I certainly don't want to promote I went into the season (as this discussion implies about Buddy) with the perfect plan for Cloke to get off to a flyer and then down-trade him to a fallen premium. I think though what came about was so effective that now it would seem like people are looking for ways to recreate that trade. I think this speaks to why some have said they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in my shoes (if I can speak to them).

One reason it was so effective was that Cloke had such a low ownership and so in theory no one else made that trade other than me. This is one thing to keep in mind with the Buddy pick. If you are aiming for him to fast start so you can do a similar kind of trade the fact is, if 20% of the comp owns him, then they will do the trade too.

I've said it before though, you've got to put yourself in those lucky positions and thats the skill going into the season. Trying to identify where odds are in your favour. Buddy is a high scoring momentum player. If he does start well then those people game enough to bank on that will reap the benefits. There are plenty of other key forwards though who could kick bags in the opening rounds - Jack, Walker, even Cloke - who if you picked instead Buddy, would advantage your team by a far greater margin (cause they'll have low ownership). Buddy is just a safer option. There are less midfielders who won't be widely owned who are likely to massively outscore their averages in the opening rounds (ie 150+ scores back to back to back). This is why key forwards are suited to this kind of trade.

It's this kind of thinking that makes me shy away from Buddy as soon as I whack him in my team. The key to that trade was it's uniqueness. The more people that pick Buddy the less potential it has to be that standout trade for your team - ie don't make him your 'strategy' going into the year. He is no more or no less a strategy than someone who is hoping for Goldy's price to fall in the opening rounds to pick him up at $600k.
 
Joined
14 Feb 2013
Messages
1,595
Likes
279
AFL Club
North Melb.
#70
Hey Sven.

You're spot on, it was born out of opportunity. As a player it was my first serious crack at SC that year so really picking Cloke - which now seems like a crazy risky selection! - was done with some naivety. Also true was the fact SJ played his own role in the trade. IF there wasn't an available premium i wanted to trade down to and I certainly don't think I would've sideways traded him. I don't think I even considered anyone else. SJ was that perfectly primed for me to upgrade Cloke (that was definitely how I saw it despite his start to the year) and pocketed $140k. Which allowed me to upgrade Wines (rookie) to Priddis (via 1 wk in Daisy).

I certainly don't want to promote I went into the season (as this discussion implies about Buddy) with the perfect plan for Cloke to get off to a flyer and then down-trade him to a fallen premium. I think though what came about was so effective that now it would seem like people are looking for ways to recreate that trade. I think this speaks to why some have said they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in my shoes (if I can speak to them).

One reason it was so effective was that Cloke had such a low ownership and so in theory no one else made that trade other than me. This is one thing to keep in mind with the Buddy pick. If you are aiming for him to fast start so you can do a similar kind of trade the fact is, if 20% of the comp owns him, then they will do the trade too.

I've said it before though, you've got to put yourself in those lucky positions and thats the skill going into the season. Trying to identify where odds are in your favour. Buddy is a high scoring momentum player. If he does start well then those people game enough to bank on that will reap the benefits. There are plenty of other key forwards though who could kick bags in the opening rounds - Jack, Walker, even Cloke - who if you picked instead Buddy, would advantage your team by a far greater margin (cause they'll have low ownership). Buddy is just a safer option. There are less midfielders who won't be widely owned who are likely to massively outscore their averages in the opening rounds (ie 150+ scores back to back to back). This is why key forwards are suited to this kind of trade.

It's this kind of thinking that makes me shy away from Buddy as soon as I whack him in my team. The key to that trade was it's uniqueness. The more people that pick Buddy the less potential it has to be that standout trade for your team - ie don't make him your 'strategy' going into the year. He is no more or no less a strategy than someone who is hoping for Goldy's price to fall in the opening rounds to pick him up at $600k.
Well said. All a 'strategy' like that is in SC is the lowest risk luck possible. You just have to be willing to take that (I'm going to throw in a term here used in other threads) Gamble :cool:
 
Joined
31 Dec 2014
Messages
544
Likes
304
AFL Club
Collingwood
#72
Great post Dimma, and what's really interesting about this is that despite this site having a very statistical and analytical focus, at the end of the day you do need to "take a punt" and go with the "gut feel", two phrases that I think are not very popular on SCS. I don't mean that as a criticism at all, I rely almost entirely 100% on SCS for insight, wisdom and outside the box thinking from fellow contributors (not to mention the genius of Rowsus), but for me analysis/stats should form the platform or base of your selections and then let the gut take over from there. It's a fine, fine balance and one which I don't get right (my results tell the story) but I can't help but think there is more room for upside from getting a unique strategy right. Luck plays a huge part.
 

Philzsay

Leadership Group
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
10,447
Likes
14,962
AFL Club
Essendon
#73
Great post Dimma, and what's really interesting about this is that despite this site having a very statistical and analytical focus, at the end of the day you do need to "take a punt" and go with the "gut feel", two phrases that I think are not very popular on SCS. I don't mean that as a criticism at all, I rely almost entirely 100% on SCS for insight, wisdom and outside the box thinking from fellow contributors (not to mention the genius of Rowsus), but for me analysis/stats should form the platform or base of your selections and then let the gut take over from there. It's a fine, fine balance and one which I don't get right (my results tell the story) but I can't help but think there is more room for upside from getting a unique strategy right. Luck plays a huge part.
I think a large of coaches on here do mainly use the stats as a base and sounding board, but ultimately make a lot of decisions based on gut feel. It probably doesn't get noticed as much as because posting "I'm picking player x based on gut feel" rarely makes a long post, whereas talking about the stats, or the players abilities and role in the team does lend itself to longer conversations and debates on the forum.
 
Joined
15 Sep 2012
Messages
475
Likes
217
AFL Club
Essendon
#74
Buddy has had a long pre season, maybe hasn't trained the whole time but one would think he has 'freshened' up. We all know what he can do in games and normally that equates to big SC scores - but giving away countless free kicks can send you nuts as a supercoach owner!

Will be heavily owned, 470k is awesome, swans still a really good team, he seems to be fit, he is very much proven, could pull off a dimma/cloke move.

Buddy a lock at the moment for mine. Could be the number 1 forward for 470k! what if he turns into the hulk for 10 rounds like Jono Brown did at 140 average all those years ago? If he dominates early the pack has got a nice lead if you don't start him.
 
Joined
8 Mar 2012
Messages
565
Likes
225
AFL Club
Collingwood
#75
He's way too risky now and be prepared for him to miss a few games.....I've enjoyed the ride though!
 
Joined
24 Aug 2012
Messages
193
Likes
90
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#77
Hey Sven.

You're spot on, it was born out of opportunity. As a player it was my first serious crack at SC that year so really picking Cloke - which now seems like a crazy risky selection! - was done with some naivety. Also true was the fact SJ played his own role in the trade. IF there wasn't an available premium i wanted to trade down to and I certainly don't think I would've sideways traded him. I don't think I even considered anyone else. SJ was that perfectly primed for me to upgrade Cloke (that was definitely how I saw it despite his start to the year) and pocketed $140k. Which allowed me to upgrade Wines (rookie) to Priddis (via 1 wk in Daisy).

I certainly don't want to promote I went into the season (as this discussion implies about Buddy) with the perfect plan for Cloke to get off to a flyer and then down-trade him to a fallen premium. I think though what came about was so effective that now it would seem like people are looking for ways to recreate that trade. I think this speaks to why some have said they wouldn't have made the trade if they were in my shoes (if I can speak to them).

One reason it was so effective was that Cloke had such a low ownership and so in theory no one else made that trade other than me. This is one thing to keep in mind with the Buddy pick. If you are aiming for him to fast start so you can do a similar kind of trade the fact is, if 20% of the comp owns him, then they will do the trade too.

I've said it before though, you've got to put yourself in those lucky positions and thats the skill going into the season. Trying to identify where odds are in your favour. Buddy is a high scoring momentum player. If he does start well then those people game enough to bank on that will reap the benefits. There are plenty of other key forwards though who could kick bags in the opening rounds - Jack, Walker, even Cloke - who if you picked instead Buddy, would advantage your team by a far greater margin (cause they'll have low ownership). Buddy is just a safer option. There are less midfielders who won't be widely owned who are likely to massively outscore their averages in the opening rounds (ie 150+ scores back to back to back). This is why key forwards are suited to this kind of trade.

It's this kind of thinking that makes me shy away from Buddy as soon as I whack him in my team. The key to that trade was it's uniqueness. The more people that pick Buddy the less potential it has to be that standout trade for your team - ie don't make him your 'strategy' going into the year. He is no more or no less a strategy than someone who is hoping for Goldy's price to fall in the opening rounds to pick him up at $600k.
Brilliant mate, I know exactly how you felt going in to that trade.

I started Monfries in 2013 on a hunch the year he was traded to Port and had a similar result. He started around $370,000 and went on to average 100 over the first few months until I pulled the trigger and ditched him for a SJ-type too. It allowed me to be right behind you right up until the painful end.

I think there is room for a stepping stone-type player somewhere but you'd have to be very clear on why he's in your team. I thought Monfires could get off to a flyer but despite how well he started I knew he'd never be a keeper. I think in 2013 we were aided by the fact that SJ was a gun who had an interrupted PS and didn't start the year until a little later and almost had a career year thereafter. Again as you mentioned, we can't control any of that but can at least put yourself in a position to capitalise on it. There'd need to be someone around that mark this year for it to work too.
 
Joined
24 Apr 2013
Messages
11,173
Likes
13,044
AFL Club
Carlton
#78
So I was watching Channel 7 News this morning and saw an interesting comment that Buddy will be spending more time in the midfield this season.
He was also said to be having the best pre-season yet since joining Sydney and cannot wait to be unleashed.

Interesting...
 

Hawk

50 Games Club
Joined
11 Feb 2014
Messages
477
Likes
80
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#79
So I was watching Channel 7 News this morning and saw an interesting comment that Buddy will be spending more time in the midfield this season.
He was also said to be having the best pre-season yet since joining Sydney and cannot wait to be unleashed.

Interesting...
So he's 'training the house down' and expecting 'more midfield time'? That's the pre-season quinella!
 
Joined
23 May 2013
Messages
11,437
Likes
20,872
AFL Club
Sydney
#80
You'd have to have some sort of terrible soul if you weren't expecting lot's of positive news stories on Buddy this off-season. Would look very bad on the press to do anything other than show 100% support.
 
Top