Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
I think this is what you are after
http://www.supercoachscores.com/thr...-Sat-April-16-530pm-onwards-The-Mail-Exchange!
http://www.supercoachscores.com/thr...-Sat-April-16-530pm-onwards-The-Mail-Exchange!
Hey Slammer,
McG is a bit of a concern, and he's certainly not taking the interecept Marks I was hoping for. I too, will probably hold Lonergan, and fix McG this week. When fixing a player like McG, I think you either have to take him all the way down, or upgrade him. I think sideways Trading them to another "hopeful" value pick is only asking for trouble. Initially I was tossing up between Dea and Weitering, even though neither is palatable at the price. This leaves me with the other unpalatable solution of trading him down to Ruggles, before he hits his bubble. In your case, Heater has a B/E of 137, and McG a B/E of 94, so if you wait a week, you are betting that McG will score within 43 points of Heater, otherwise the price gap will increase. It's not outside the realms of possibility, that Heater goes 130, McG 60, and suddenly they are $12k further apart. I think you should get on the front foot, and go to Docherty (over Simpson). His role looks a lot more SC-friendly under the new team structure, and game plan.
As to whether you do Goldy instead, that's a bit sideways for me. Which Ruck do you take out? NicNat? Gawn? I know Goldy has a perceived magic run coming up, especially with Sandi now out of the Picture, but to burn a trade and dollars on that now really looks like you are chasing that 172!
McG is a bit of a concern, and he's certainly not taking the interecept Marks I was hoping for. I too, will probably hold Lonergan, and fix McG this week. When fixing a player like McG, I think you either have to take him all the way down, or upgrade him. I think sideways Trading them to another "hopeful" value pick is only asking for trouble. Initially I was tossing up between Dea and Weitering, even though neither is palatable at the price. This leaves me with the other unpalatable solution of trading him down to Ruggles, before he hits his bubble. In your case, Heater has a B/E of 137, and McG a B/E of 94, so if you wait a week, you are betting that McG will score within 43 points of Heater, otherwise the price gap will increase. It's not outside the realms of possibility, that Heater goes 130, McG 60, and suddenly they are $12k further apart. I think you should get on the front foot, and go to Docherty (over Simpson). His role looks a lot more SC-friendly under the new team structure, and game plan.
As to whether you do Goldy instead, that's a bit sideways for me. Which Ruck do you take out? NicNat? Gawn? I know Goldy has a perceived magic run coming up, especially with Sandi now out of the Picture, but to burn a trade and dollars on that now really looks like you are chasing that 172!
Hey Pro,
go the distance. I know Goldy doesn't have to face Sandi now, but I would stick to your plan. Waiting will also give you a better idea of which one should go, to get Goldy in too.
Spot on. If you are contemplating a risky sideways trade like this, particularly this early in the season, you want to be confident it is right. If you are ummmming and aaahing as to which one to "upgrade", or whether you should even do it at all, the best thing to do, is to do nothing!
go the distance. I know Goldy doesn't have to face Sandi now, but I would stick to your plan. Waiting will also give you a better idea of which one should go, to get Goldy in too.
Spot on. If you are contemplating a risky sideways trade like this, particularly this early in the season, you want to be confident it is right. If you are ummmming and aaahing as to which one to "upgrade", or whether you should even do it at all, the best thing to do, is to do nothing!
Hi FGD, welcome aboard. 
Greene's B/E is only 81, so holding him isn't too big of a risk. If you do decide to trade, I would go down, as you can't reach any player you like going up. I don't like the Parish/Oliver option, as getting on expensive Rookies after they have already had a price rise is not very efficient. Remember, a Rookie's first job is to make Cash, and his second job is to score points. In your position, I would probably hold Greene. If you are forced to trade, bring Brown down to your Fwd line, and get Hartley, or if you like taking risks, Ruggles.
Good luck, I hope you jump the right way.
Greene's B/E is only 81, so holding him isn't too big of a risk. If you do decide to trade, I would go down, as you can't reach any player you like going up. I don't like the Parish/Oliver option, as getting on expensive Rookies after they have already had a price rise is not very efficient. Remember, a Rookie's first job is to make Cash, and his second job is to score points. In your position, I would probably hold Greene. If you are forced to trade, bring Brown down to your Fwd line, and get Hartley, or if you like taking risks, Ruggles.
Good luck, I hope you jump the right way.
Hey B18,
not something I have in my history of stats, and therefore would take me too long to compile.
Sorry.
I don't often knock back requests, but I can see that taking a good 10-12 hours of work, and I'm not sure it would actually help identify who might do it this season. ergo - the workload to reward doesn't seem to justify it.
Once again, sorry I don't like knocking back requests.
not something I have in my history of stats, and therefore would take me too long to compile.
Sorry.
I don't often knock back requests, but I can see that taking a good 10-12 hours of work, and I'm not sure it would actually help identify who might do it this season. ergo - the workload to reward doesn't seem to justify it.
Once again, sorry
I don't like knocking back requests. 
Hey B18,
not something I have in my history of stats, and therefore would take me too long to compile.
Sorry.
I don't often knock back requests, but I can see that taking a good 10-12 hours of work, and I'm not sure it would actually help identify who might do it this season. ergo - the workload to reward doesn't seem to justify it.
Once again, sorry I don't like knocking back requests.
not something I have in my history of stats, and therefore would take me too long to compile.
Sorry.
I don't often knock back requests, but I can see that taking a good 10-12 hours of work, and I'm not sure it would actually help identify who might do it this season. ergo - the workload to reward doesn't seem to justify it.
Once again, sorry
I don't like knocking back requests.
No worries at all! I had a feeling it might be quite a mammoth task too so completely understandable.
I'll continue my search for that magic mid season bolter who can save my ranking
Have a great time in Aus!
B18
Hi Salty,
it's a somewhat unconventional team you have there (not that there's anything wrong with that). Having Keays/Gresham at M10/11, forcing Hewett/Davis to M8/9 (M Crouch M7, for those playing along at home), potentially problematical. The biggest problem is if TWO selection dramas hit in the one week, which can happen. I'm not a big fan of bringing in high priced Rookies after a price rise, and it seems you have enough players in this sort of price range. I think you either hold for this week, and see what happens, or go Gresham to Hartley/Ruggles (little risky) or possibly Short. It leaves more of your Cash free, and they potentially grow as much (or even more!) than Parish from here anyway. If you are convinced Parish is an 80+ player, it may not be too late to grab him, but I think you should take Gresham down, if you trade him out.
Good luck, I hope you jump the right way.
it's a somewhat unconventional team you have there (not that there's anything wrong with that). Having Keays/Gresham at M10/11, forcing Hewett/Davis to M8/9 (M Crouch M7, for those playing along at home), potentially problematical. The biggest problem is if TWO selection dramas hit in the one week, which can happen. I'm not a big fan of bringing in high priced Rookies after a price rise, and it seems you have enough players in this sort of price range. I think you either hold for this week, and see what happens, or go Gresham to Hartley/Ruggles (little risky) or possibly Short. It leaves more of your Cash free, and they potentially grow as much (or even more!) than Parish from here anyway. If you are convinced Parish is an 80+ player, it may not be too late to grab him, but I think you should take Gresham down, if you trade him out.
Good luck, I hope you jump the right way.
Yo Rowsus.
If you were to trade out one of Sheridan and Lonergan, which one would it be?
I will buy you a beer in thanks
If you were to trade out one of Sheridan and Lonergan, which one would it be?
I will buy you a beer in thanks
Schooner of Carlton it is!
Hey there Row.
Would love to hear your opinion on this:
Last week I decided to trade Rockliff down to Papley via DPP.
My reasoning was that I believed that Rocky would be out for more than 2 weeks (which is looking very likely) and I also felt like I made a mistake picking him in the hope his injury woes were behind him. Basically I felt like I needed to make a corrective trade to a more robust premium keeper selection. I also felt that if i played my looping cards right, I could maximise my rookie scoring to make up for his absence (this actually worked quite well as I only missed McCarthy's 96 for Papley's 46 but still managed to score over 2300 which I was quite happy with)
This lead me to trading in bubble-boy Papley who, while he did not set the world on fire again, still produced significant coin and should continue to do so. So it was basically undertaking a 1 down 1 up trade...but over 2 weeks instead of the 1.
Which leads me to my question: which under-priced mid would you chose to replace Rockliff? I am currently sitting on Selwood, but would like to hear your thoughts
Note: there is also the option of downgrading someone like a Hewett to a Hartley (for example) for more coin, but not sure with a move like that either. No rookies are currently popping out at me
Would love to hear your opinion on this:
Last week I decided to trade Rockliff down to Papley via DPP.
My reasoning was that I believed that Rocky would be out for more than 2 weeks (which is looking very likely) and I also felt like I made a mistake picking him in the hope his injury woes were behind him. Basically I felt like I needed to make a corrective trade to a more robust premium keeper selection. I also felt that if i played my looping cards right, I could maximise my rookie scoring to make up for his absence (this actually worked quite well as I only missed McCarthy's 96 for Papley's 46 but still managed to score over 2300 which I was quite happy with)
This lead me to trading in bubble-boy Papley who, while he did not set the world on fire again, still produced significant coin and should continue to do so. So it was basically undertaking a 1 down 1 up trade...but over 2 weeks instead of the 1.
Which leads me to my question: which under-priced mid would you chose to replace Rockliff? I am currently sitting on Selwood, but would like to hear your thoughts
Note: there is also the option of downgrading someone like a Hewett to a Hartley (for example) for more coin, but not sure with a move like that either. No rookies are currently popping out at me
Hi Rowsus
Thanks for all of your wonderful work over the years, you really are the supercoach guru! I'm pretty sure I remember reading in one of your posts that Nick Dal Santo has the most supercoach points over his career than anyone else since it's inception. Just wondering if you could confirm this, and if it's readily convenient, perhaps provide a table of the top 10 supercoach scorers of all time with their total career points. Cheers, JC.
Thanks for all of your wonderful work over the years, you really are the supercoach guru! I'm pretty sure I remember reading in one of your posts that Nick Dal Santo has the most supercoach points over his career than anyone else since it's inception. Just wondering if you could confirm this, and if it's readily convenient, perhaps provide a table of the top 10 supercoach scorers of all time with their total career points. Cheers, JC.
Hey Row,
You posted in your Tables and Analysis Thread that you thought Jack Martin lacked physical attributes and would be played as a small forward a lot until he develops them.
I've only seen him play once this year (against Freo) and he looks to have bulked up quite a bit and has put together a respectable first 3 games. Has your opinion changed? Or is he still too much of a risk to consider?
You posted in your Tables and Analysis Thread that you thought Jack Martin lacked physical attributes and would be played as a small forward a lot until he develops them.
I've only seen him play once this year (against Freo) and he looks to have bulked up quite a bit and has put together a respectable first 3 games. Has your opinion changed? Or is he still too much of a risk to consider?
- Status