What do you think are the implications of this in terms of approach? I was thinking:
- don’t overpay for premiums without a good reason,
- perhaps analyze the draw/potential tags more in identifying upgrade targets,
- consider mid pricers more seriously, especially those who could perform at keeper level and/or act as a good pinch hitter
- use corrective trades more actively to ensure you have the right rookies
- jump on almost any decent downgrade target, especially if the pipeline looks thin (it might actually be okay if they simply don’t play round 1)
- err more on squeezing dollars out of each rookie, rather than taking day 80% of their cash gen quickly and moving on to the next one.
Some of the above is obviously a balancing act (eg the last two points) because they conflict somewhat.
Before the preseason started, my plan was to go full GnR to help ensure that I picked every good starting rookie - which is a strategic nuance I hadn’t appreciated until last season.
In a shallow rookie year it will be more important to get on the good rookies (increasing the potential of the rookie heavy GnR approach) but if there simply aren’t enough half decent rookies playing, then rookie number 18-20 may not be worth selecting anyway.
- don’t overpay for premiums without a good reason,
- perhaps analyze the draw/potential tags more in identifying upgrade targets,
- consider mid pricers more seriously, especially those who could perform at keeper level and/or act as a good pinch hitter
- use corrective trades more actively to ensure you have the right rookies
- jump on almost any decent downgrade target, especially if the pipeline looks thin (it might actually be okay if they simply don’t play round 1)
- err more on squeezing dollars out of each rookie, rather than taking day 80% of their cash gen quickly and moving on to the next one.
Some of the above is obviously a balancing act (eg the last two points) because they conflict somewhat.
Before the preseason started, my plan was to go full GnR to help ensure that I picked every good starting rookie - which is a strategic nuance I hadn’t appreciated until last season.
In a shallow rookie year it will be more important to get on the good rookies (increasing the potential of the rookie heavy GnR approach) but if there simply aren’t enough half decent rookies playing, then rookie number 18-20 may not be worth selecting anyway.