Discussion Round 10: Teams & In Game Discussion

[7/11]

Fair point but ultimately a team that doubles the opposition's score really shouldn't be scoring less with a system that is touted as reflecting game impact rather that meaningless stats. 15 behinds is going to cost games more than giving away a couple of 50s in junktime.

Gotta look at where the points were allocated early on. Pretty sure a lot of Brisbane's points were given in the first half and we ended up 183 short because Brisbane barely recorded stats in the last quarter. We'll see a fair chunk of these leftover points going to Richmond I would assume.

 

[Lgndhen23]

although the tigers have alot of good players to come in, it doesnt necessarily mean they will be a better team for it

alot of players who are playing new roles and excecuting them perfectly like baker and bolton

if it means shifting it all alround and taking away form players and replacing with big names, doesnt mean the output will be the same

 

[bloke]

704/5 (Neale C)

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290612086855278592

 

[GrainFedBeef]

Brisbane leading the supercoach scoring 1552 vs 1496, Richmond doubling their score on the scoreboard. Yes, real measure of "impact on the game" or whatever their slogan is.

21 shots on goal vs 22, is it really that far out.

Brisbane broke down on the half forward line and pressured shots on goal, plus some stupid turnovers in the corridor. There is a numbers of possessions that take it to get it to the forward line to generate 21 shots on goals. That is what the system is recording.

ps. Last 3 ins Gawn 157, Stewart 147 and Neale 149 - I will take that. Hopefully next premium in tomorrow can continue the run. Better than the first 3 in Hurn, Wingard and Pittonet all around 80's.

 

[AngryAnt]

21 shots on goal vs 22, is it really that far out.

Brisbane broke down on the half forward line and pressured shots on goal, plus some stupid turnovers in the corridor. There is a numbers of possessions that take it to get it to the forward line to generate 21 shots on goals. That is what the system is recording.

Another way to look at it is 12 goals vs 4, triple the amount of goals. Bad kicking = bad football, possessions that lead to goals should be worth more than those than don't. A lot of Brisbane's shots for goals are from tight angles and at distance. Granted they missed a few easy ones but they weren't missing them from directly in front for most of the time, Richmond were walking in some goals.

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290612752902270976

 

[Studz]

Good stuff Shorty! Solid score there mate(125). You done good.

 

[Herbie66]

3/320

Bazlenka
Ladhams
TJL

 

[sethlad]

although the tigers have alot of good players to come in, it doesnt necessarily mean they will be a better team for it

alot of players who are playing new roles and excecuting them perfectly like baker and bolton

if it means shifting it all alround and taking away form players and replacing with big names, doesnt mean the output will be the same

3 of those are AA & Nank is the number 1 ruckman.
Hard to see them any worse

 

[Professor]

Neale 149 hmmm

 

[IDIG]

Neale 149 hmmm

This is why I paid the big bucks. That didn’t look remotely close to a 150 game

 

[minidee]

although the tigers have alot of good players to come in, it doesnt necessarily mean they will be a better team for it

alot of players who are playing new roles and excecuting them perfectly like baker and bolton

if it means shifting it all alround and taking away form players and replacing with big names, doesnt mean the output will be the same

You know what happened last year yeah?

 

[IDIG]

@Connoisseur can you create the round 11 trades thread? 😆 need to put these in it.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290615072981540870

You can do it yourself mate

 

[Ben's Beasts]

6/806 (c)

Pickett’s 68 the worst so far so hopefully it drops out with 22 playing.

 

[Herbie66]

although the tigers have alot of good players to come in, it doesnt necessarily mean they will be a better team for it

alot of players who are playing new roles and excecuting them perfectly like baker and bolton

if it means shifting it all alround and taking away form players and replacing with big names, doesnt mean the output will be the same

But they are all team orientated and play the role for the betterment of the team.

System based team for a number of years now has lead to their success.

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290611764929814528

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Picking my son was a mistake.

 

[Herbie66]

Lions have had goal kicking issues for 2 seasons , thought I read most I50 and have the worst conversion rate.

Need to fix it Fagan and quickly.

 

[IDIG]

Picking my son was a mistake.

Lol. Most traded in by almost 20k coaches.