Discussion Round 10: Teams & In Game Discussion

[doc ron]

1900-2000 should be an OK score I would imagine?

 

[KLo30]

Staggered that people would go early on Ballenden/Skinner not knowing who goes out for McStay.

They were both playing their second game, so it wasn't going early. JS was certainly an issue and probably meant they should have been avoided.

 

[Brettthejett]

1900-2000 should be an OK score I would imagine?

depends on what the likes of Gawn,grundy ect score

 

[lavenderbandit]

Ok ill be that guy even tho pretty sure my understanding is correct.

I have VC on Neale. E on Aarts. By moving the non-playing Comben on field in the forward line and making him C, I will both get both of
- Neales score as my C
- Aarts score on field providing it ends up in the best 18

Correct yeah??

 

[Goodie's Guns]

They were both playing their second game, so it wasn't going early. JS was certainly an issue and probably meant they should have been avoided.

Think Herbie might be referring to "early" in terms of McStay coming back in next week from suspension, and seeing which of the two survives as the second ruck option to the Big O.

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Ok ill be that guy even tho pretty sure my understanding is correct.

I have VC on Neale. E on Aarts. By moving the non-playing Comben on field in the forward line and making him C, I will both get both of
- Neales score as my C
- Aarts score on field providing it ends up in the best 18

Correct yeah??

Correct on both.

 

[Herbie66]

Think Herbie might be referring to "early" in terms of McStay coming back in next week from suspension, and seeing which of the two survives as the second ruck option to the Big O.

100% correct

Cheers

 

[GrainFedBeef]

Ok ill be that guy even tho pretty sure my understanding is correct.

I have VC on Neale. E on Aarts. By moving the non-playing Comben on field in the forward line and making him C, I will both get both of
- Neales score as my C
- Aarts score on field providing it ends up in the best 18

Correct yeah??

yep, emg still included if there is a non playing player on the field.

 

[Maccas marvels]

768/6 with Neale captain.

hopefully drop Picketts 68 out of the score as have 22 playing.

 

[lavenderbandit]

Correct on both.

yep, emg still included if there is a non playing player on the field.

Thanks legends

 

[7/11]

6/721 Neale VC locked in. Shan't be taking Skinner's pitiful score. Hope he hangs around for another week, because I 100% regret trading him in last minute.

 

[GrainFedBeef]

4/610 (Neale C)

good start, however, plenty of quality on the bench.

 

[Courtesans]

Neale invoked the mercy rule, could have been 180+

 

[frosty1]

5/587, or 5/736 if I take Neale, which seems likely. No access to Aarts score though....

 

[KLo30]

Think Herbie might be referring to "early" in terms of McStay coming back in next week from suspension, and seeing which of the two survives as the second ruck option to the Big O.

Without the first price rise they wouldn't be worth bringing in. I'm not sure that the tall set up worked all that well, however had Brisbane kicked straight a different conclusion may have been reached. 41, 26 and 20 from the three tall forwards certainly screams avoid.

 

[IDIG]

5/717 (Neale)

20 + Ling for me this round. Would love for Pickett’s 68 to drop off but think that’s very unlikely with McKay, Simpson, Close, Bennell, Draper, Cameron...and Devon to come.

 

[Rumbler]

The projection we've all been waiting for lads! Brb gonna go get a vomit bag

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290617632865959940

 

[Connoisseur]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290631140487737346

 

[Darkie]

Round 11

Cotchin not playing v Port Adelaide (managed)

Source: commentator on Triple MMM radio

Isn't he the captain and just had three games off? Seems very strange to be managed against the top side too.

 

[Zoku Pops]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290631140487737346

Was just discussing this with a mate before I saw the tweet. I'm a massive Lachie fan but not sure you can pay that for him!