- Joined
- 28 Dec 2016
- Messages
- 747
- Likes
- 3,842
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Same was said when Bevo moved Matthew Boyd to half back, most were very skeptical (myself included). However he went from a kicking efficiency of in the 60s to almost 80% after being moved :-
From defence Matthew Boyd is still averaging 28 touches a game - not quite the 33 of his midfield pomp, but still a mighty number. His disposal efficiency is touching 80 per cent, a big jump from the 60s of his All-Australian years. The relative time and space of the two positions renders this a logical improvement; he smiles at the "if I only knew then what I know now" nature of his new role.
"Maybe I should have been a backman earlier, and understood that when you do turn the ball over in the midfield the backs get hurt. I probably didn't have that appreciation early in my career. It might have helped."
From defence Matthew Boyd is still averaging 28 touches a game - not quite the 33 of his midfield pomp, but still a mighty number. His disposal efficiency is touching 80 per cent, a big jump from the 60s of his All-Australian years. The relative time and space of the two positions renders this a logical improvement; he smiles at the "if I only knew then what I know now" nature of his new role.
"Maybe I should have been a backman earlier, and understood that when you do turn the ball over in the midfield the backs get hurt. I probably didn't have that appreciation early in my career. It might have helped."
I do reckon that Boyd was a far superior footballer to Ziebell though before they made their backline switches.
I reckon there would be more cases of it not turning out as well, and Boyd was a pretty strong outlier.