It would make more sense to look up his scores from 2020, he averaged just under 110 a game take out his score of 13
Consistent scores and more proven scorer than Guthrie
He was playing well prior to his 149 last week (i brought him in last week)
For those that are looking at that 550-600k range of midfielders, honestly it’s each to their own. Everyone has preferences (one player over another), as long as you can justify your decision to back whichever player you bring in, and you don’t lose sleep over it, only hindsight will really tell what a ‘better’ decision is
Personally I don’t believe Brayshaw is a ‘proven’ premium so therefore I’m not even considering him at 472k (I know a lot of you guys are), whereas Duncan/Boak/Walsh/Mundy I’d class in the more proven category (considering one of the latter 3 this week for Dunkley)
Consistent scores and more proven scorer than Guthrie
He was playing well prior to his 149 last week (i brought him in last week)
For those that are looking at that 550-600k range of midfielders, honestly it’s each to their own. Everyone has preferences (one player over another), as long as you can justify your decision to back whichever player you bring in, and you don’t lose sleep over it, only hindsight will really tell what a ‘better’ decision is
Personally I don’t believe Brayshaw is a ‘proven’ premium so therefore I’m not even considering him at 472k (I know a lot of you guys are), whereas Duncan/Boak/Walsh/Mundy I’d class in the more proven category (considering one of the latter 3 this week for Dunkley)
If anything I'd be enjoying the 1% ownership whilst it lasts. The less people on Duncan probably the better for you if you believe he will be a top 10 mid.
We all have our own biases and preferences at the end of the day.