Discussion General Discussion

Which team wins a final first?

  • Essendon

    Votes: 23 28.4%

  • Tasmania

    Votes: 58 71.6%
  • Total voters
    81
Studz

Studz

#4,241
Joined
20 Feb 2020
Messages
290
Likes
735
AFL Club
Bulldogs
#4,241
Here we go again; VIC in Lockdown from midnight. Guessing that translates into spectator free games in Melb. assuming the matches go ahead....
 
Studz

Studz

#4,243
Joined
20 Feb 2020
Messages
290
Likes
735
AFL Club
Bulldogs
#4,243
Goodie's Guns said:
The AFL literally answered your questions in a press release an hour ago...
Click to expand...
They did did they....so they are pushing on it seems ? Just cancel the damn round and play it next weekend: bye done for the year for all (providing no more lockdowns from here on out of course)

Wont happen of course- not when clowns run the circus
 
M

meataxe

#4,248
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Messages
930
Likes
1,961
AFL Club
Melbourne
#4,248
The "Bounces" statistic - what does it actually refer to?

For example, in the Bulldogs v Demons game last night, the AFL app has the Bounces stat as 4 for Demons. And in the Lions v Tigers match in R10, Lions had 2 Bounces.

Surely it's not saying that Melbourne and Lions players only bounced the footy 4 and 2 times respectively in the entire match?
 
toxic

toxic

#4,252
Joined
6 Jun 2013
Messages
4,211
Likes
14,058
#4,252
Have a rules question on a tactic

At a centre bounce after a goal

A wing leaves the field through the interchange and is NOT replaced

Runs down to a back pocket (7man defence strategy) but does not enter field of play till the ball is bounced.
Could in theory be done with a fwd pocket as well.
2 extra blokes in defence

Is it against the rules?
 
mike89

mike89

#4,253
Joined
20 Dec 2016
Messages
10,767
Likes
52,325
AFL Club
Carlton
#4,253
toxic said:
Have a rules question on a tactic

At a centre bounce after a goal

A wing leaves the field through the interchange and is NOT replaced

Runs down to a back pocket (7man defence strategy) but does not enter field of play till the ball is bounced.
Could in theory be done with a fwd pocket as well.
2 extra blokes in defence

Is it against the rules?
Click to expand...
Don't you have to enter the field of play through the interchange gates? That would seem to scupper that plan, cause you'd still have to get back from the wing.
 
wogitalia

wogitalia

#4,255
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,258
AFL Club
Sydney
#4,255
mike89 said:
Don't you have to enter the field of play through the interchange gates? That would seem to scupper that plan, cause you'd still have to get back from the wing.
Click to expand...
This, would be an illegal substitution which is a 50m penalty from the centre and shot at goal basically so significantly worse than even numbers.

As far as I know though you could start at the very back corner of the square and drift straight in at the bounce anyway.
 
toxic

toxic

#4,257
Joined
6 Jun 2013
Messages
4,211
Likes
14,058
#4,257
wogitalia said:
This, would be an illegal substitution which is a 50m penalty from the centre and shot at goal basically so significantly worse than even numbers.

As far as I know though you could start at the very back corner of the square and drift straight in at the bounce anyway.
Click to expand...
No substitution occured
 
toxic

toxic

#4,258
Joined
6 Jun 2013
Messages
4,211
Likes
14,058
#4,258
wogitalia said:
Oh in that case, you'd fail the 6-6-6 as you wouldn't have 6 players in the middle section.
Click to expand...
True but less than 6?

If you had 5 injuries who couldn't continue you'd automatically give a free-kick at every centre bounce if that was the case
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top