Which players have you locked in after nab challenge form
- Thread starter yakka
- Start date
Think you can use NAB to check out players returning from injury. D Beams is a good example. However I agree with Footyrulz that it is mainly about rookies. I'm focusing on the bottom placed teams (from last year) for rookies so JKH and Michie look good for Dees. Don't trust that the top teams will give rookies a decent run - that's just my personal opinion.
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 2,105
- Likes
- 107
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Fair assessment for mine. Still far too early to look at locking any in for me. Still wary after my Karnezis/Harper selections from last season - lol I'm concentrating a little more on team game plans and how they're looking at moving the ball at the moment. But have been pleasantly surprised with the form of some of the rookies thus far on the watchlist.
Early days yet with Roos and Melbourne but I wonder if he will adopt a similar plan to what he had at Sydney. From memory he did not bring in many players during the year. Once he thought the team was right he tended to leave it alone. While Melbourne is a different situation I'm wondering if once he decides a player is in he leaves them in. If so early rookies selected and performing okay could be long term season players. Although some rookies gets have got games in the past from round 1 and kept on getting them a lot of them get 3 or 4 games then drop out and come back 5 rounds later play a few then drop out etc etc.
I believe this is the correct answer 
Unless the premium was a breakout type (let's say Swallow for example), then i'd possibly take NAB form into consideration but even then it would be just to confirm my reasoning for choosing him in the first place.
Unless the premium was a breakout type (let's say Swallow for example), then i'd possibly take NAB form into consideration but even then it would be just to confirm my reasoning for choosing him in the first place.
He is the main running player down back, very rear to see him play stick with roles.
Out of all the players around that price I think that he's the most consistent players in relation to points and I think now with their mid stocks running thin Bartell goes back to spending more time in the mid.. maybe Bartell for an extra 60K
Out of all the players around that price I think that he's the most consistent players in relation to points and I think now with their mid stocks running thin Bartell goes back to spending more time in the mid.. maybe Bartell for an extra 60K
Enright is great. I have had him every year I can remember. He, NDS and Boomer Harvey were pretty much my unique pod last year in the home stretch. Very consistent and durable but lacked the punch compared to the other options. Scotland was very consistent and I went to the well one two many times last year bringing him in which killed off my season. The domino effect of that bad trade cost me trades, money and hundreds of points which was my shot at winning the whole thing.
In my opinion Enright is overpriced. He will drop substantially like he does every year (100-150k) and at that adjusted price is an excellent D6. The last couple of years he has pretty much been my first upgrade. Will look to do the same this year after his first bye. Hoping like hell he doesn't have a Scotland like dropoff, but at his advancing age.....Father time gets everyone eventually.
McVeigh, Mitchell, Bartel, Simpson, Hodge, Hanley, H.Shaw. 7 off the top of my head that will substantially outscore Enright.
In my opinion Enright is overpriced. He will drop substantially like he does every year (100-150k) and at that adjusted price is an excellent D6. The last couple of years he has pretty much been my first upgrade. Will look to do the same this year after his first bye. Hoping like hell he doesn't have a Scotland like dropoff, but at his advancing age.....Father time gets everyone eventually.
McVeigh, Mitchell, Bartel, Simpson, Hodge, Hanley, H.Shaw. 7 off the top of my head that will substantially outscore Enright.