Discussion 2022 AFL: Practice Matches & AAMI Community Series Discussion

[Shaunpro1]

How accurate do we think this is. If that was a 120 game from Rowell I'm back in. Looked like a 90 odd game watching it.

Edit: Just saw it was from champion data....

Its done by the usual people but Ive watched all these games and been astounded by some of the scoring.

 

[NT.Thunder]

God damn it Rowell…

I said exactly the same thing.

 

[AngryAnt]

Damn Rowell

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1498099371027886081

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/SimoLove/status/1498099371027886081


Reduced capacity?

 

[Seymour Skinner]

God damn it Rowell…

40+ differential between SC and Fantasy.

 

[scarfaceclaw]

Now I have to find $180k. Pfft!

 

[Shaunpro1]

40+ differential between SC and Fantasy.

Some of the scaling in pre season games feels ridiculous, buyer beware IMHO when theres that much difference between scores in the two formats.

 

[Ben's Beasts]

40+ differential between SC and Fantasy.

Contested beast.

 

[Ginty22]

Rowell 118 from 18 disposals and 7 tackles is more like his scoring in his first 4 games rather than his scoring from second half last year. Turning in big scores from stats that might not suggest it
Without seeing full stats can only assume they were mainly contested and high clearance numbers.
If he does it again this week it throws a spanner in the works as I’d locked in berry and having both would change structures

 

[scarfaceclaw]

I only watched about a quarter of the game because I was sick of watching hinkleys game plan. Rowell was very very contested. I didnt think he was that clean and he wasn't getting easy possessions. Looks like I'm changing structure. There's plenty of time to work it out.

 

[NT.Thunder]

40+ differential between SC and Fantasy.

If that's a sign of things to come there's no way you can leave him out. I thought his game was probably an average game of what we'd expect from him this season so jeepus

 

[mike89]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1498094743041232896

View: https://twitter.com/FantasyFreako/status/1498094743041232896?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

That's pretty hard to ignore. Sucks as it probably means Rayner has to go, surely three value selections from the same mid group is too many...

 

[AngryAnt]

That's pretty hard to ignore. Sucks as it probably means Rayner has to go, surely three value selections from the same mid group is too many...

I didn't see anything from Rayner that warrants selecting him. He did start on ball, didn't really do much and was parked in the forward line for a lot of the game after that, got a bit of the ball up the ground in the third quarter.

 

[NT.Thunder]

That's pretty hard to ignore. Sucks as it probably means Rayner has to go, surely three value selections from the same mid group is too many...

If that's the case IMO you've dodged a bullet

 

[Shannon]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1498039367935279104

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/bryceharcher/status/1498039367935279104

8 tackles for Hinge is impressive - do we have any idea what his SC score was for the game?

 

[BIGB0Y]

Berry was at 8% ownership before the practice match and is already on 13%. How high will he get up to on the back of this news?

Love the Zac Bailey score high on my radar

 

[Shannon]

8 tackles for Hinge is impressive - do we have any idea what his SC score was for the game?

Can answer my own question now lol, 79 :-

 

[Shannon]

Suns v Port SC scores :-

 

[PC]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1498099371027886081

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/SimoLove/status/1498099371027886081


Reduced capacity?

Future Avengers base.

 

[Courtesans]

That's pretty hard to ignore. Sucks as it probably means Rayner has to go, surely three value selections from the same mid group is too many...

Means H-F has to go for me to get Berry in and down to 2 basement fwd rookies Wanganeen and Parker. Not too sure..