Strategy 2022: Round 3 Trades
- Thread starter Tamuhawk
- Start date
Mitch McGovern to anyone! 
Also somehow Cripps get into my team!
Also somehow Cripps get into my team!
McGovern is already dead to me.
Cripps in... but it probably has to come at the expense of a defender (Hewett D5, so there's some options above him).
Problem is, that means bringing a rookie or mid-price def. Maybe Sinn looks amazing
That takes two trades already which means if I want to punt McGovern (and I really do), it might be boost time. Seems like such a waste!
Anybody see a way around that pickle?
Problem is, that means bringing a rookie or mid-price def. Maybe Sinn looks amazing
That takes two trades already which means if I want to punt McGovern (and I really do), it might be boost time. Seems like such a waste!
Anybody see a way around that pickle?
You always know when a popular player's had a shocker because of how early the trade thread opens up!
Looks like I now go Gov + Owens to Martin + Rowell.
Liked English's game but 99 against Pittonet surely isn't enough to dismantle my structure. Definitely in the general forward conversation though.
Looks like I now go Gov + Owens to Martin + Rowell.
Liked English's game but 99 against Pittonet surely isn't enough to dismantle my structure. Definitely in the general forward conversation though.
Cripps in... but it probably has to come at the expense of a defender (Hewett D5, so there's some options above him).
Problem is, that means bringing a rookie or mid-price def. Maybe Sinn looks amazing
That takes two trades already which means if I want to punt McGovern (and I really do), it might be boost time. Seems like such a waste!
Anybody see a way around that pickle?
Problem is, that means bringing a rookie or mid-price def. Maybe Sinn looks amazing
That takes two trades already which means if I want to punt McGovern (and I really do), it might be boost time. Seems like such a waste!
Anybody see a way around that pickle?
Let last year go.
Then assess it again and make a call. A lot of the reasons you didn't start him may have changed or may still be there and you should make the decision on that.
If you didn't pick him because of durability, that still exists as a concern. If you didn't pick him because of scoring concerns I'd argue that has lessened considerably. If it's a bit of both, where is the weighting? If it's something else, what's the equation say now?
Then assess it again and make a call. A lot of the reasons you didn't start him may have changed or may still be there and you should make the decision on that.
If you didn't pick him because of durability, that still exists as a concern. If you didn't pick him because of scoring concerns I'd argue that has lessened considerably. If it's a bit of both, where is the weighting? If it's something else, what's the equation say now?
English is a perfect example of nice if you have him, no issue if you don't.
None of the ruck options last week showed any sign you should move them for him, so it would be a forward restructure if you were chasing. Reckon he's one to put high on the list of upgrade targets at the position because having him by the byes could offer huge value with an extra score during the ruck bye of doom and he's definitely looking good for top 5 in that position.
There's also the Martin factor who definitely hurts him when he plays.
None of the ruck options last week showed any sign you should move them for him, so it would be a forward restructure if you were chasing. Reckon he's one to put high on the list of upgrade targets at the position because having him by the byes could offer huge value with an extra score during the ruck bye of doom and he's definitely looking good for top 5 in that position.
There's also the Martin factor who definitely hurts him when he plays.
For sure but you're still looking at the guy who was 24th on the list last week and is now 22nd this week and Mead had basically everything go right for his role last week and still couldn't put up a big score.
To pay 160k for him unsighted is a pretty big punt.
To be clear, I really like him and think he could work but I'd rather have a flexible DPP guy at 120k in a certain role who has a slightly lower ceiling if I'm going sight unseen this week. Obviously could go for other targets as well, doesn't have to be either of the Port guys.
To pay 160k for him unsighted is a pretty big punt.
To be clear, I really like him and think he could work but I'd rather have a flexible DPP guy at 120k in a certain role who has a slightly lower ceiling if I'm going sight unseen this week. Obviously could go for other targets as well, doesn't have to be either of the Port guys.