I've allowed this to sink in after a couple of days and now can put forward my thoughts to get some opinions so I can make a well inform decision and own it.
Essentially the OUTs remains the same and Cripps as one of the INs, can do Hall & Hewett in liew of Short & Heeney.
Whitfield is my 'ugly duckling' after 2 rounds, a luxury (corrective at a stretch) which I'm still not sure about as it's too earlier to be making this type of trade, but team looks more appealing with a Hall/Hewett instead.
I may employ a KISS approach and save a boost by doing McGovern & Berry to Cripps & Heeney/Hewett.
Let's hear what the 'wisdom of the crowd' has to say...
Essentially the OUTs remains the same and Cripps as one of the INs, can do Hall & Hewett in liew of Short & Heeney.
Whitfield is my 'ugly duckling' after 2 rounds, a luxury (corrective at a stretch) which I'm still not sure about as it's too earlier to be making this type of trade, but team looks more appealing with a Hall/Hewett instead.
I may employ a KISS approach and save a boost by doing McGovern & Berry to Cripps & Heeney/Hewett.
Let's hear what the 'wisdom of the crowd' has to say...
Another option is perhaps Berry, McGov out for Macrae and Rachele or similar combo, gets you a genuine top line mid and another great cash cow.
What ever trades you do I think when you look at it include the Gawn -> Witts trade to look at the overall affect on your team.
So Gawn, Berry, McGov -> Witts, Cripps, Hewett/Heeney or
Gawn, Berry, McGov ->Macrae, Witts, Rachele etc.