Discussion 2022 Round 4: Teams & In Game Discussion

Joined
2 Mar 2014
Messages
588
Likes
2,041
AFL Club
Essendon
Sandy's VFL game is at 12pm, so if Hayes turns out for that then there's a pretty good chance that he wont be the sub for the AFL game.

Having said that it wouldn't be the first time a player has been pulled from the VFL game at 1/4 or 1/2 time and rushed over to suit up for the AFL game in the same afternoon, so there is that little niggle at the back of our minds still even if he does play in the VFL and that wont go away until 3:20pm tomorrow.

If it's any comfort then it's no better for me either, I have Dixon's 96 and Macrae's VC score now riding on Hayes not being the sub. If he is then I'll have no choice but to shift the C elsewhere and pass on Macrae's VC score to limit the damage, but it will still cost me 100+ points no matter how things pan out which kinda sucks.

Isn't fantasy football just a barrel load of fun!!! Should make for a nice relaxing Sunday arvo for a lot of us... :ROFLMAO:
Thanks @Grundogging will play it safe unless Hayes plays for Sandy
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
18/1886 Heeney

Hinge
Cripps , Rowell
Curnow

Think about what to do with Butters , Ryan becoming a concern , why oh why didn't I back myself and start D Rioli.

Just need to be patient and wait for my bench rookies to moo (as slow as that might be)

Multiple fallen premiums appearing in the next few rounds , be interesting watching those aggressive coaches if they grab them ASAP.
Ryan might be a bit of a concern, but I'm sticking with Butters personally. Had the stuffing knocked out of him by that moron SPP last week and then this week's game was an outlier with Port only kicking one goal in three quarters of play - Butters still had 23 touches, 4 marks, 2 tackles, 4 clearances and 11 CBAs this week so nothing really concerning there numbers-wise their whole team just got pantsed and defenders swallowed up all of the points on the Port side of the fence.
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Daicos averaging 91.8 , Horne-Francis averaging 83.2 after 4 rounds.

Be extremely surprised if they are season long keepers personally.
Daicos at 90+ is a decent option as a D6 loop option at worst all the way up to the bye rounds IFF he gets DEF DPP.

JHF is probably one of the earlier cows to moo and be shifted out the door for a premo.
 
Joined
24 Nov 2015
Messages
1,039
Likes
3,327
I watched the Richmond-Bulldogs game without looking at scores and boy was I surprised when I saw them. Quantity does not equal quality, take not CD. Take a good 20% off those top Dogs scores and you'll get a much more accurate reflection of how they played. Macrae possibly the least spectacular 158 I've seen (how many of those disposals to the disadvantage of a teammate were ruled effective?), Smith butchered it as usual and was poor when it mattered, and so was Dale.

Basically I would've scored them all like Dunkley.
Na disagree on Macrae.
He was their best by a mile
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,727
Likes
107,806
AFL Club
Collingwood
Daicos at 90+ is a decent option as a D6 loop option at worst all the way up to the bye rounds IFF he gets DEF DPP.

JHF is probably one of the earlier cows to moo and be shifted out the door for a premo.
Why move him though ? Who replaces him onfield as a mid ?

Might be just easier to upgrade them both to premium mids.

IF he does get DPP , I guess I could upgrade Blakey , Hinge , McCartin via him.

Need to wait and see what happens I guess.

Certainly some of the onfield rookies are making nice $ but bench guys like Gibcus , SDK , Rachele , Stephens , Ward , Durdin etc are going to take their time.

Need 2-3 more games out of Dixon & Hayes as well
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,769
Likes
26,252
AFL Club
Sydney
Swans vs North

General - Watched a bit of footy since this one so not as specific probably as normal... interesting game this one, Sydney were very ordinary in their intensity for a second week in a row, North on the opposite side really responded to their woeful performance last week and brought the heat. Ultimately Sydney's structures held up just enough and a superior fitness base allowed them to limp home.

Sydney - One of those tough games to judge, this was always a danger game against a side embarrassed last week that needed to respond for a side that played themselves well and truly out of form last week and was just scrapping for something. Will be happy that for the most part the defense held up but the midfield was again lacklustre and the pressure level was not good enough. Got the win at the end of the day though and move on.

Heeney - Tale of two halves here, was very ordinary in the first half, was very good in the second. Role was all over the shop but did his best work from HF, it seemed like Stephenson was tagging him in the first half to me, seemed to basically go with him to most places and did a good job, released though in second half and Heeney went to work, had a big Q4 including a sealer that seemed to score very well despite not really being important or relevant. Just looks great this year though. Those who started him are singing right now.

McInerney - Another who was pretty ordinary through 2.5 quarters and then dominated, was the best player on the field in Q4, genuinely brought his own pill and used it well. Would love this type of game to be closer to his standard moving forward, the talent is there.

Mills - The only Swan who really played a good four quarter effort, wasn't great by his standards but was really good. Bit of an ankle (probably achilles) issue in Q3 iirc which is obviously a concern with him. Hopefully rounding into some fitness and form though.

Florent - Was much better today, will say it every time he plays well until he does it but this needs to be the standard not the exception.

Campbell - Was brilliant today, intercepted and looked confident in the role for one of the few times. One of those players who doesn't know how good he is and just scratching the surface. Bad for Stephens as he's probably one of about 3 spots I think is genuinely available and this kind of outing slams that shut for a couple.

Lloyd - At this point are there any players who aren't upgrade targets in the next month? Scrappy game from him, from what I could tell Turner was putting work into him and it worked, Campbell stepped up and took the job on which was nice but Lloyd well held and had his disposal impacted and that definitely hurts, as much as I hound him for cheap touches, he does also take on the important 20m inside kicks more than anyone else that can open things up.

Rowbottom - I have no idea what game CD were watching that he had a positive ratio, looking at the stats I'm even more baffled. Thought he was poor again to be honest with a couple of truly dreadful disposals included.

Gulden - Got stuck a lot deeper this week and hurt his scoring, didn't help the team was so bad in general.

Ladhams - Hickey might just be our most important player and if he's going to play to this level, that only gets more pressing. He was really poor. I actually think he's a good player but this outing was pretty good confirmation why we're playing the likes of Reid, McLean and Amartey as our 2nd rucks over him...

Blakey - Fought through to put up a better score than it looked like for most of the game. Made a few key mistakes but can't fault the desire to take the game on and we need more of it.

Ronke - Came on midway through the 3rd and genuinely changed the game, if it wasn't Buddy that was subbed I'd be very suss about the whole thing (I still am) but this was the best game he's played (yes, including the 7 goal game), just never seen him play so well.

Kennedy - Similar to my Ward comment above sadly, he's just struggling to find a position where he's a positive outside the midfield and he's been passed on in that area. Honestly after the way Horse did ROK dirty and cost him his 300 games I hope that he doesn't do Kennedy like that but I'm not sure he's best 22 anymore and I would understand if he did, like I did then :(

Parker - Copping the "Bevo on Dunkley" treatment right now of playing out of position more often than in it, just need to see him in the ruck at this point. One of those hard ones, no matter how cheap he gets, you can't buy him on current role, even if he gets DPP he'd be a hard sell right now because he's barely playing midfield, I don't know if he's injured or a victim of the great round one game but right now he's lost, this might be the worst 3 week stretch of his career. He's a champ so you'd think he bounces back but he needs a chance. This isn't Kennedy, he's still our best inside midfielder and while I'm the first to champion more Heeney and Mills, there's nothing to explain Florent or Rowbottom over him outside Horse always has his favourites and those two obviously are at the top of the list.

P. McCartin - Solid again, just well positioned and takes the chances. Feel like there is a 90 game in him real soon. Head knock was a scary one but was a very good approach at the ball and can't fault it, just happens in footy, was great to see he was cleared and came back on, hopefully there's no delayed concussion issues or anything given his history and just an over-abundance of caution from the docs to even test him! Been one of the great stories of the season.

North - Gallant in defeat, probably a term their fans hate at this point but they outworked Sydney, were far harder at the man and the ball and with just a bit more class and fitness could have won this game very easily. Heck they almost won it without those two things! Interesting to see so many position changes as well.

Simpkin - Worked his butt off to put together a strong game. Wouldn't shock me if he keeps building from this game and has a very strong season from here. Rate him.

McDonald - Pushed to a wing today, perhaps just to screw those who brought him in early expecting a position change, played well and was important. Lot of clangers though and that's an issue. Still it's probably a cleaner role.

Hall - Not a great game but registered a decent score anyway, perhaps the best takeaway of this game was the positional changes, both Ziebell and McDonald out of his way paves a path for some monster scores in the very near future, imo. Uncharacteristically high amount of clangers held him back a bit.

JHF - Shame he went home at 3QT as he was enormous in the first 3. Last 2.5 weeks have probably cooked his chances of getting DPP but I guess you cop that for the massive increase in scoring capacity. He was fantastic, just so much time with the ball and such a powerful kick. He's basically what Ziebell should have been.

Ziebell - Played full forward this week, kicked 5 so you imagine it sticks. Didn't do much else and think he's wasted in that role and provides more if he can get more touches but it worked today.

Goldy - The great man is trying to kill the Xerri dream. Was just so dominant in the ruck, I guess we already knew he was the better player but he kind of just gave the big middle finger to anyone doubting it.

LDU - It's funny, he still always looks so surprised when people tackle him, he's a good one though and finally seems to be building a base to run games out a bit. That said, needed to do more late.

Xerri - Stinker for him, wasn't even that bad but mucked up a couple of key chances late in the game and just struggled to impact at ground level this week. Still dominated Ladhams as well though, have to assume a lot of sharking happened to his hitouts. Also low TOG as was off for an inordinate amount of time in the 3rd.

Perez - Started well, faded hard. Wonder if they persist with McDonald wing and Ziebell forward to give him chances. Worth watching as will be game 3 in a couple of weeks, just about perfect timing for a downgrade and he's a serious talent who just needs his knees to hold together!
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,769
Likes
26,252
AFL Club
Sydney
Why move him though ? Who replaces him onfield as a mid ?

Might be just easier to upgrade them both to premium mids.

IF he does get DPP , I guess I could upgrade Blakey , Hinge , McCartin via him.

Need to wait and see what happens I guess.

Certainly some of the onfield rookies are making nice $ but bench guys like Gibcus , SDK , Rachele , Stephens , Ward , Durdin etc are going to take their time.

Need 2-3 games out of Dixon & Hayes as well

You move him because a 90 average at D6 is leaking 10 points and allows you to upgrade the D6 from the 65 range of the rookies right now to that 90, while jumping the M8 type spot he's in right now to a 115 type. Basically getting a 50 point upgrade across the two positions.

If you just upgrade him direct you might get a 120 guy instead but that's only a ~30 point upgrade.

Basically the aim of upgrades is to fix the spots where you're leaking the most points, right now for most that's going to be D5-6 and M8. Daicos, assuming he gets DPP, is that unique option to fix two of those problems.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,727
Likes
107,806
AFL Club
Collingwood
You move him because a 90 average at D6 is leaking 10 points and allows you to upgrade the D6 from the 65 range of the rookies right now to that 90, while jumping the M8 type spot he's in right now to a 115 type. Basically getting a 50 point upgrade across the two positions.

If you just upgrade him direct you might get a 120 guy instead but that's only a ~30 point upgrade.

Basically the aim of upgrades is to fix the spots where you're leaking the most points, right now for most that's going to be D5-6 and M8. Daicos, assuming he gets DPP, is that unique option to fix two of those problems.
Simple as Hinge or McCartin to a premium mid , no worries just pluck 2-3 bench downgrades like that.

Just need to remember players have only had one price rise so far

Daicos 90 to a 110 mid = 20 gain
D5/D6 60 to a 100 def = 40 gain

Just depends how and which way you do it
 

Markl

Draftee
Joined
12 Jul 2015
Messages
61
Likes
198
AFL Club
St Kilda
Hi all
i need a therapy session…..
with only a fair start in the first 3 rounds so far….this round is shaping up much better.
14/1646 V Gawn
i have NOD on the bench with E…..can trade Rachele to Uwland …..move Hewett to mid on the field ….move Uwland to def and then get NODs score….is this worth it …..please talk me out of it….
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,727
Likes
107,806
AFL Club
Collingwood
Ryan might be a bit of a concern, but I'm sticking with Butters personally. Had the stuffing knocked out of him by that moron SPP last week and then this week's game was an outlier with Port only kicking one goal in three quarters of play - Butters still had 23 touches, 4 marks, 2 tackles, 4 clearances and 11 CBAs this week so nothing really concerning there numbers-wise their whole team just got pantsed and defenders swallowed up all of the points on the Port side of the fence.
I just need to work out if Butters fits as a season long forward keeper or not , Dunkley , Heeney & Cogs taking up 3 spots.

Who gets F status added , who else do I want ?

If I want Preuss next round is Butters my best way of getting him or not.

Is Xerri still worth holding onto as R cover if he gets F/R status.

Does Butters himself end up as a F/M which could be advantageous moving forward.

Lots of things to consider.
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Why move him though ? Who replaces him onfield as a mid ?

Might be just easier to upgrade them both to premium mids.

IF he does get DPP , I guess I could upgrade Blakey , Hinge , McCartin via him.

Need to wait and see what happens I guess.

Certainly some of the onfield rookies are making nice $ but bench guys like Gibcus , SDK , Rachele , Stephens , Ward , Durdin etc are going to take their time.

Need 2-3 more games out of Dixon & Hayes as well
It's more about moving on the DEF rookies than anything, a lot of the DEF premos are so up and down like you mentioned in your earlier post, which makes it hard to do straight 1-down-1-up moves on the DEF line when we don't really have a good read on any of the DEF premos that have "fallen" at this point.

We also know that the more prolific cash cows generally tend to pop up in the midfield as the season progresses but the current crop of MID rookies looks like it might take a bit longer to moo - Daicos and JHF because their ceiling is higher, Stephens, Ward and McDonald because of their lowish scoring - so the downgrades might need to be triggered on other lines initially to get a specific upgrade target in.

Personally Stephens is almost certainly leaving my team to make room for Preuss next week, after which my rookie group is looking really solid - Hinge, McCartin, SDK, NOD, Daics35, JHF, Rachele, Ward, Macdonald, Preuss, Hayes, Martin, Dixon (plus the fairly standard 200k+ types in Berry, Xerri, Brodie, Cogs), with only two trades used (if I bring Preuss in).

The harder part is going to be unpacking them all in the right order, which again might require some DPP links to be set up if I can manage it.

As an aside I'm not too fussed if Dixon and/or Hayes aren't getting a game as they'll still act as useful loop agents on the FWD and RUC lines with Grundy, English, Zerri and possibly Preuss all needing to be juggled in the short-to-medium term.
 
Joined
19 Jan 2014
Messages
4,104
Likes
3,078
AFL Club
Fremantle
Hi all
i need a therapy session…..
with only a fair start in the first 3 rounds so far….this round is shaping up much better.
14/1646 V Gawn
i have NOD on the bench with E…..can trade Rachele to Uwland …..move Hewett to mid on the field ….move Uwland to def and then get NODs score….is this worth it …..please talk me out of it….
Not worth it, trading in a donut to the detriment of your team for maybe 40 points. Essentially trading 1 trade plus future cash gen for 40 points + $120k
 
Top