Looped the latter two in case one of them got injured / really stunk it up but with both in the 90s and my cover effectively being Wehr I'm kind of committed to taking them both.
No VC on Oliver so still got two bites at that cherry...
Simon Goodwin also hopes Clayton Oliver has only bruised his thumb after needing to come off in the final term for treatment but said the club will monitor it in the days ahead.
As frustrating as Heeney has been, I reckon I’d have to take him over a 72, unless you thought he was going to play hindered.
The 124 is high enough that I’d normally take it, but if you think the planets align for a really high expected score for someone this week, I think it’s viable to pass on it.
I would definitely take Heeney - not only is 72 a low-ish bar for him to at least meet, it means to have an emergency score in case of a late out for one of your other forwards.
As frustrating as Heeney has been, I reckon I’d have to take him over a 72, unless you thought he was going to play hindered
The 124 is high enough that I’d normally take it, but if you think the planets align for a really high expected score for someone this week, I think it’s viable to pass on it.
I would definitely take Heeney - not only is 72 a low-ish bar for him to at least meet, it means to have an emergency score in case of a late out for one of your other forwards.
Even if he matches his worst score for the year it only costs you 19 points so not too terrible.. plus he did get 88 vs the dogs earlier in the year. I'd definitely back him in!
I would definitely take Heeney - not only is 72 a low-ish bar for him to at least meet, it means to have an emergency score in case of a late out for one of your other forwards.
Yeah it's a tough call with Oliver, reckon I'm going for Neale's myself, I'd go Heeney over 72 Jel, he could get 5 goals and get a 150 but even if he has a shocker 50 or so it's only 20 points down there.