Current team:
View attachment 50313
With regards to the final trade, we will need to either go with Webster or another BAT option. Trading him will leave us with Short, Khan, Neser, Stoinis as the only playing BAT options. Even if we traded Hales out instead of Gilkes, it might give us a bit extra cash to spend ($155,900), but it would still need to be a BAT option. Hardie (BE -41) is about the only one I'd consider, and I think I'd prefer the Hales/Webster (BE -35) combo to Gilkes/Hardie.
Currently we are on 1/338 from 4 SI or 1/411 (Steketee) from 5 SI if we lock in Steketee as VC. With nobody else to come having a double, and Steketee with another game to play, I suggest locking in the VC, meaning we are on 1/411, with 10 SI to go. Swepson was a bit disappointing in last night's match, but our other 3 were great options. We'll wait and see after his second match if we would have been better off with the second cash cow option, but it wasn't a terrible call.
I've already made the decision we will be looping on Hosein, and I highly doubt anyone disagrees. This means we need to bench one of our 3 bowlers yet to play - Rashid, Tye or Zampa. Rashid plays the Heat at the Gabba and he has an average of 112.5 from 4 games there, with a low of 64 - those numbers suggest we have him on field. As previously mentioned, the Scorchers v Stars game is at Junction Oval, which is quite a small ground and has previously been batting friendly. I'd suggest benching one of the two from this game - I would expect it is easier to hit a spinner for 6, which is why I had Zampa as the bench option, but this needs to be confirmed.
Good start to the round, hopefully we can keep it going.
View attachment 50313
With regards to the final trade, we will need to either go with Webster or another BAT option. Trading him will leave us with Short, Khan, Neser, Stoinis as the only playing BAT options. Even if we traded Hales out instead of Gilkes, it might give us a bit extra cash to spend ($155,900), but it would still need to be a BAT option. Hardie (BE -41) is about the only one I'd consider, and I think I'd prefer the Hales/Webster (BE -35) combo to Gilkes/Hardie.
Currently we are on 1/338 from 4 SI or 1/411 (Steketee) from 5 SI if we lock in Steketee as VC. With nobody else to come having a double, and Steketee with another game to play, I suggest locking in the VC, meaning we are on 1/411, with 10 SI to go. Swepson was a bit disappointing in last night's match, but our other 3 were great options. We'll wait and see after his second match if we would have been better off with the second cash cow option, but it wasn't a terrible call.
I've already made the decision we will be looping on Hosein, and I highly doubt anyone disagrees. This means we need to bench one of our 3 bowlers yet to play - Rashid, Tye or Zampa. Rashid plays the Heat at the Gabba and he has an average of 112.5 from 4 games there, with a low of 64 - those numbers suggest we have him on field. As previously mentioned, the Scorchers v Stars game is at Junction Oval, which is quite a small ground and has previously been batting friendly. I'd suggest benching one of the two from this game - I would expect it is easier to hit a spinner for 6, which is why I had Zampa as the bench option, but this needs to be confirmed.
Good start to the round, hopefully we can keep it going.