Just thinking about how to solve the potential Lycett problem, (although I suppose you could do a lot worse than Lycett):
If you factor in that you'll probably send Dunkley forward at some stage of the year then your forward line as it stands now looks very stacked, maybe too much so. I would say pick one of Cunnington or Flanders and downgrade the other to a rookie/Ratugolea which should allow you to get Lycett up to a Sean Darcy or another set and forget premium. Alternatively if you want to keep both then maybe consider sending Flanders into your mids and drop Hopper for the aforementioned rookie/Ratugolea. The Hopper selection in and of itself isn't a bad one, just alongside Tom Green the risk goes up slightly, same with Cunnington + Flanders and also Yeo + Bowes. There's nothing wrong with each of these selections individually and on face value, but when you consider them as part of a whole, then their risk is not only accumulated, but compounded. There comes a time when selecting mid-pricers/PODs reaches a critical mass where their cumulative risk becomes untenable and you're just better off replacing some of them with rookies. This allows you to mitigate some of the risk, as well as freeing up some cash to upgrade the sub-premiums (like Lycett, in this instance) who stand little chance of making it into the top 6-8 of their lines, saving you some trades in the long run.
Hope this helps and that it wasn't too incoherent!