2023: SC Planning Thread

Joined
3 Feb 2014
Messages
3,702
Likes
5,297
AFL Club
West Coast
A thought experiment:

It's Round 6. By an absolute miracle, you've crafted your starting side so well that you haven't needed to use a single trade so far. Some rookies are slow burning up around $200k, but a few are pushing $300k. Your midpricers have made about $80-100k a pop.

But (insert uber elite midfield gun you didn't pick) has dropped to under $650k - but he's about to go on a very juicy run. Do you go for him? Do you trade out your $400k midpricer or do you boost and go 2 down 1 up with rookies? Would your decision change if you'd used 10 trades and 2 boosts thus far?
 
Joined
3 May 2017
Messages
2,684
Likes
8,886
AFL Club
Hawthorn
A thought experiment:

It's Round 6. By an absolute miracle, you've crafted your starting side so well that you haven't needed to use a single trade so far. Some rookies are slow burning up around $200k, but a few are pushing $300k. Your midpricers have made about $80-100k a pop.

But (insert uber elite midfield gun you didn't pick) has dropped to under $650k - but he's about to go on a very juicy run. Do you go for him? Do you trade out your $400k midpricer or do you boost and go 2 down 1 up with rookies? Would your decision change if you'd used 10 trades and 2 boosts thus far?
My boosts plans, probably rnd 3 correction, I couldn't resist last year. Rnds 5/6 for a further 4 rounds. If I need to save one from that list for an additional sling shot in rnd 15 I will, as I'm a bit heavy on rnd 15 bye players. So yeah it's the double down, always looking to get the rookie off field, because you're maximising your onfield scoring power. Cheers
 
Joined
2 Mar 2014
Messages
2,837
Likes
5,190
AFL Club
Essendon
A thought experiment:

It's Round 6. By an absolute miracle, you've crafted your starting side so well that you haven't needed to use a single trade so far. Some rookies are slow burning up around $200k, but a few are pushing $300k. Your midpricers have made about $80-100k a pop.

But (insert uber elite midfield gun you didn't pick) has dropped to under $650k - but he's about to go on a very juicy run. Do you go for him? Do you trade out your $400k midpricer or do you boost and go 2 down 1 up with rookies? Would your decision change if you'd used 10 trades and 2 boosts thus far?
Unchartered territory mate, but yes you go for him.
 
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
290
Likes
1,362
AFL Club
St Kilda
Since this is the planing thread.

What are people planning to do if Marshall breaks a finger in round 3 and is out for one week maybe two?
I wouldn’t cop a donut that’s for sure.

1 - Trade Marshall to a cheaper performing ruck if there is one.
2 - If DCam or Jackson are performing well, trade my worst performing fwd premo (if there is one) to them, and switch them to the ruck line as cover via Madden.
3 - Make another correction trade to a player that’s going to make cash and use the spare $ to get Marshall up to a higher priced ruck.

Always going to be ‘what if’s’ in this game.

I know we drum on about the 36 trades, but I do think the contingencies of certain situations are not as difficult as years gone by, always options.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
4,154
Likes
14,751
AFL Club
North Melb.
A thought experiment:

It's Round 6. By an absolute miracle, you've crafted your starting side so well that you haven't needed to use a single trade so far. Some rookies are slow burning up around $200k, but a few are pushing $300k. Your midpricers have made about $80-100k a pop.

But (insert uber elite midfield gun you didn't pick) has dropped to under $650k - but he's about to go on a very juicy run. Do you go for him? Do you trade out your $400k midpricer or do you boost and go 2 down 1 up with rookies? Would your decision change if you'd used 10 trades and 2 boosts thus far?
Try this perspective:

By Round 6 your starting team are not really rookies or mid-pricers any more, they are just players with value based on what they will score from that point forward.

A $400k player who will average 80 going forward (even if they are averaging more/less up to this point) offers no more value than a $600k player who will average 120. The $400k player just scores less points. The equation for winning becomes less about direct value and more about getting the most points on field.

So if you can convert cash on the bench into points on field, without sacrificing any unrealised value from your pool (players with cash still to make) you absolutely trade. The sooner the better!
 
Joined
7 Jan 2014
Messages
941
Likes
819
AFL Club
Collingwood
Having trouble getting both a D/M and a F/M link in my midfield.

Currently have Mackenzie @ M8, with Phillips and Baker as 2 of my 3 bench spots. The 3rd spot can then either go to someone like Chesser / Cincotta (D/M), or to someone like Davey / McLean / Phillipou (F/M).

Alternative is to replace M3 (currently Kelly) with Dunkley, and re-introduce Coniglio to F1.

Thanks in advance for the thoughts.
 
Joined
3 Feb 2014
Messages
3,702
Likes
5,297
AFL Club
West Coast
Having trouble getting both a D/M and a F/M link in my midfield.

Currently have Mackenzie @ M8, with Phillips and Baker as 2 of my 3 bench spots. The 3rd spot can then either go to someone like Chesser / Cincotta (D/M), or to someone like Davey / McLean / Phillipou (F/M).

Alternative is to replace M3 (currently Kelly) with Dunkley, and re-introduce Coniglio to F1.

Thanks in advance for the thoughts.
I'd take Cogs over Jelly myself.
 
Top