Discussion 2023: Round 1 Teams & In Game Discussion - See page 1 for Teams and Final Subs

Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,760
Likes
11,755
AFL Club
West Coast
Can see the "free" sub rule potentially becoming an issue when you have first year rookies in your SC team. They are easy sub targets.

The AFL introduced a sub rule because of serious injury/concussion. Which is fine. Then clubs manipulated and cheated the rule and everyone knows it is a bad look. Makes AFL look silly. AFL answer? Not tell the Clubs don't fudge it. They just change the rule so it is not a bad look anymore. Classic AFL.
 
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
3,146
Likes
3,903
AFL Club
Carlton
Can see the "free" sub rule potentially becoming an issue when you have first year rookies in your SC team. They are easy sub targets.

The AFL introduced a sub rule because of serious injury/concussion. Which is fine. Then clubs manipulated and cheated the rule and everyone knows it is a bad look. Makes AFL look silly. AFL answer? Not tell the Clubs don't fudge it. They just change the rule so it is not a bad look anymore. Classic AFL.
Yes but great for development
 
Joined
28 Jun 2012
Messages
5,408
Likes
3,683
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Can see the "free" sub rule potentially becoming an issue when you have first year rookies in your SC team. They are easy sub targets.

The AFL introduced a sub rule because of serious injury/concussion. Which is fine. Then clubs manipulated and cheated the rule and everyone knows it is a bad look. Makes AFL look silly. AFL answer? Not tell the Clubs don't fudge it. They just change the rule so it is not a bad look anymore. Classic AFL.
Tbf the afl don't care about fantasy. Take away that and what is wrong with bringing on fresh legs?
 
Top