Strategy 2023: Round 3 Trades
- Thread starter Tamuhawk
- Start date
No real issues, not ideal to have a bad score in round 2 but he had 4 games under 90 last year (3 70s), he'll cancel them out with a couple of big scores.
He had probably a dozen times in the game his teammates could have gone him and they generally do. Basically he looked fine and scored badly.
On my list of problems right now, he's just about at the bottom of the list. Congratulations if he's near the top of yours
The only missing factor in this is the on-field aspect. If comparing say Chandler and Setterfield, one is producing very good on-field scoring and has a role that's likely to continue to do so while Chandler has quite possibly put up his two best scores.
If cash gen is the only factor then the Chandler type is a better play, if on field scoring is a factor, and it likely is at round 3, then that factor is definitely worth considering.
Basically it comes down to whether getting say 30 points on field is worth more than the extra 50-100k that the rookie is likely to make. Really depends on how long you're going to be fielding them for this.
He had probably a dozen times in the game his teammates could have gone him and they generally do. Basically he looked fine and scored badly.
On my list of problems right now, he's just about at the bottom of the list. Congratulations if he's near the top of yours
The only missing factor in this is the on-field aspect. If comparing say Chandler and Setterfield, one is producing very good on-field scoring and has a role that's likely to continue to do so while Chandler has quite possibly put up his two best scores.
If cash gen is the only factor then the Chandler type is a better play, if on field scoring is a factor, and it likely is at round 3, then that factor is definitely worth considering.
Basically it comes down to whether getting say 30 points on field is worth more than the extra 50-100k that the rookie is likely to make. Really depends on how long you're going to be fielding them for this.
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 4,731
- Likes
- 9,085
- AFL Club
- Brisbane
So confused about trades.
Out Doc, in N Daicos - doesn't feel right, but hey
Out Chesser via DPP swap with Pou, in Ziebell - Also means I can take Pedlar/Pou off field in FWDS
Out Darcy, in Cameron - Probably scores 200 against WC now.
Going for Ziebel means I will miss out on either Chandler and Worpel.
Bugger.
But I see Ziebell as being a potential keeper with his current role and if I were to go Worpel, I would need to field Pou or Pedlar. which is not ideal.
Out Doc, in N Daicos - doesn't feel right, but hey
Out Chesser via DPP swap with Pou, in Ziebell - Also means I can take Pedlar/Pou off field in FWDS
Out Darcy, in Cameron - Probably scores 200 against WC now.
Going for Ziebel means I will miss out on either Chandler and Worpel.
Bugger.
But I see Ziebell as being a potential keeper with his current role and if I were to go Worpel, I would need to field Pou or Pedlar. which is not ideal.
- Joined
- 25 Dec 2022
- Messages
- 3,378
- Likes
- 16,582
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Have a plan for if Hopper is out for 3+weeks (possibly even 2).
Hopper to Setterfield
Ridley to Naicos
Chesser to Chandler via Davey
Means I have to hold Flanders. I will then trade him next week to whoever looks better out of Bowes and Crozier via Constable. I need Flanders to go up 6.3k to reach Bowes which requires 49 or 50🤞. Whoever I get will be a POD.
After all of this I will still have DEF-MID and MID-FWD swings with Davey in the mids and 4 MID/FWD’s in the fwd line as well as Constable in the mids with Ginbey in defence.
Quietly hoping Hopper gets ruled out for a while (unlikely) as I think this will give me an advantage.
Hopper to Setterfield
Ridley to Naicos
Chesser to Chandler via Davey
Means I have to hold Flanders. I will then trade him next week to whoever looks better out of Bowes and Crozier via Constable. I need Flanders to go up 6.3k to reach Bowes which requires 49 or 50🤞. Whoever I get will be a POD.
After all of this I will still have DEF-MID and MID-FWD swings with Davey in the mids and 4 MID/FWD’s in the fwd line as well as Constable in the mids with Ginbey in defence.
Quietly hoping Hopper gets ruled out for a while (unlikely) as I think this will give me an advantage.
- Joined
- 14 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 182
- Likes
- 761
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I’m hoping some of you guys can talk me out of this because I just feel so dirty doing it.
Currently ranked 2,824th overall.
Docherty > Daicos
Hopper (Assuming his injured) > Setterfield
Chessar > Chandler
I’ve always been one to trade conservatively but with 36 available this year, being aggressive is the way to go.
I’m not usually one to ask for advice/opinions on trades but I really need some positive reinforcement or sense talked into me. Lol.
Currently ranked 2,824th overall.
Docherty > Daicos
Hopper (Assuming his injured) > Setterfield
Chessar > Chandler
I’ve always been one to trade conservatively but with 36 available this year, being aggressive is the way to go.
I’m not usually one to ask for advice/opinions on trades but I really need some positive reinforcement or sense talked into me. Lol.
Out: Bailey Dale, Chesser & Flanders
In: McKenna, LDU & Chandler
Cash is king & with this I shouldn't lose too much value across the side. I maintain a premo & grab two of the most likely scoring rooks across their respective lines. Chandler may hit a wall in a few weeks, but I'll cross that bridge when I get to it.
It means Hunter Clark survives as surely he gets an extended look inside with decent TOG seeing as Steele is out. If he's still low TOG then he really doesn't have a tank and needs to go.
The Hopper injury really is annoying as he showed his potential on the weekend. Hopefully he can get a price rise in before I turn him into Laird, but with 300k sitting in my kitty that needs to be on the field I get the feeling that'll be sooner rather than later.
In: McKenna, LDU & Chandler
Cash is king & with this I shouldn't lose too much value across the side. I maintain a premo & grab two of the most likely scoring rooks across their respective lines. Chandler may hit a wall in a few weeks, but I'll cross that bridge when I get to it.
It means Hunter Clark survives as surely he gets an extended look inside with decent TOG seeing as Steele is out. If he's still low TOG then he really doesn't have a tank and needs to go.
The Hopper injury really is annoying as he showed his potential on the weekend. Hopefully he can get a price rise in before I turn him into Laird, but with 300k sitting in my kitty that needs to be on the field I get the feeling that'll be sooner rather than later.
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 77
- Likes
- 317
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I've got the one trade locked in for this week but really unsure on my other 2 at the moment, and they are probably season defining.
Fyfe > Setterfield is definitelty happening, I traded Jelly to Cogs last week so I will swing him forward.
Couple of options for my other two, at the moment I have Darcy > Cameron and Flanders > Ziebell but that means I will miss Chandler which may hurt me in the long run, but probably gives me more scoring power for now.
The other options I'm considering are Darcy > Cameron/English and Flanders > Chandler or Chesser > Chandler. These will net me Chandlers rookie cash but means I will miss out on Ziebell's points on field for now and will be stuck with probably Flanders or Phillipou on field instead.
Any thoughts SCS?
Fyfe > Setterfield is definitelty happening, I traded Jelly to Cogs last week so I will swing him forward.
Couple of options for my other two, at the moment I have Darcy > Cameron and Flanders > Ziebell but that means I will miss Chandler which may hurt me in the long run, but probably gives me more scoring power for now.
The other options I'm considering are Darcy > Cameron/English and Flanders > Chandler or Chesser > Chandler. These will net me Chandlers rookie cash but means I will miss out on Ziebell's points on field for now and will be stuck with probably Flanders or Phillipou on field instead.
Any thoughts SCS?
LDU’s a long term pick - no need to fret about one potentially tagged game in the short term.
Besides, Magginess was playing HF and HB against the Swans and not tagging anyone against Syd, when there were targets available. Don’t recall him tagging anyone at the Dons in R1 either.
If the Hawks current form is anything to go by, they’ll likely get blown away by the Kangas (in good form) by HT and there’ll be no point in having a tag.
Besides, Magginess was playing HF and HB against the Swans and not tagging anyone against Syd, when there were targets available. Don’t recall him tagging anyone at the Dons in R1 either.
If the Hawks current form is anything to go by, they’ll likely get blown away by the Kangas (in good form) by HT and there’ll be no point in having a tag.
- Joined
- 24 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 6,697
- Likes
- 30,160
- AFL Club
- Sydney
