Discussion 2023 Round 3: Teams & In Game Discussion

[dicksilverman]

2202 Clarry

 

[Drew]

Is it not commonplace to quickly browse through a few leagues featuring quality coaches and possibly double ups and then pick a random number with no methodology and extrapolate for a few tens of thousand and then throw out the word par whilst stating there is high variance below par and to 1900 but no mention of the variance on the other scale to balance out those scores?

Probably better to look at your public league with randoms to get an idea I think. 4/20 are 2200+ including myself with 2259 the highest. SCS leagues are usually above them norm.

 

[aj74]

2097 Naicos

MPMs a bit underwhelming this week: JHF and Setters each played 3 quarters for their 80 odds. ZB only made it to 78. The less said about Worpel the better. Callaghan a shocking effort too.

But it's the premiums that are killing me. Doc, Bont and Marshall all failed to get to 90 and Gulden was another.

Richards, Naicos, Ginbey, Green, Darcy, Dunkley, Taranto and Fo Sheezel my only tons

 

[7/11]

99% being below it is what makes it the par line...

There's roughly 160k teams, top 1600 is the top 1%, so par is inside that top 1% being top 1000.

Some people do have much lower standards on par though.

if 1000-1600 teams scored above 2300 I’ll be very surprised. Especially considering there was an 84 point variance between 1st and 40th (2375) in the score tracker app that professor posted earlier.

The fact not many here in SCS have posted scores of 2300+ makes me pretty confident that par 1% is in the 2200-2260 range.

 

[Russty_]

I thought Par was just whether you go up or down in rankings that week.

 

[Inside50]

It’s Open

 

[Johnsy44]

I dropped from 2,300 to 19,700….

 

[frosty1]

if 1000-1600 teams scored above 2300 I’ll be very surprised. Especially considering there was an 84 point variance between 1st and 40th (2375) in the score tracker app that professor posted earlier.

The fact not many here in SCS have posted scores of 2300+ makes me pretty confident that par 1% is in the 2200-2260 range.

I reckon that there is likely a substantial difference between par of those ranked in the top 1000 of supercoach, and the top bunch on this round. Makes it very hard to define a "par".

 

[7/11]

I reckon that there is likely a substantial difference between par of those ranked in the top 1000 of supercoach, and the top bunch on this round. Makes it very hard to define a "par".

And I think that’s the confusion of the discussion. There were well over 1600 coaches scoring over 2300 (just looked through), but how many of those coaches ended up in the top 1% or how many post round 2 coaches in the top 1% scored over 2300 is another matter.

Edit: up 24k places to 47k. Good to break the top 50k for the first time this season.

 

[frosty1]

Up 14000 places to 21k. Heading in the right direction. Still angry at the 67 points left on the table because I couldn't work out the difference between blue and gold ......

 

[Locky27]

2288, moved up to 5,703rd, up 50,000 spots from where I was after round 1.

 

[Professor]

 

[Old Big 'Ead]

Ouch!!

 

[Drew]

25763rd for the round, moved up over 17000 spots to 52882. A couple more rounds like that and I should be doing alright.

 

[wogitalia]

Is it not commonplace to quickly browse through a few leagues featuring quality coaches and possibly double ups and then pick a random number with no methodology and extrapolate for a few tens of thousand and then throw out the word par whilst stating there is high variance below par and to 1900 but no mention of the variance on the other scale to balance out those scores?

if 1000-1600 teams scored above 2300 I’ll be very surprised. Especially considering there was an 84 point variance between 1st and 40th (2375) in the score tracker app that professor posted earlier.

The fact not many here in SCS have posted scores of 2300+ makes me pretty confident that par 1% is in the 2200-2260 range.

Over 3000 teams broke 2300 so par for the round was well within that region.

Those scoring 2250 moved up marginally inside the overall top 1000, took 2300+ to move in any significant manner. 2200 was going backwards.

 

[tso]

 

[Miller is a Steele]

Oliver tackle is going to be yet another test of what the actual criteria is at the tribunal.

On action it was considerably worse than Broad last week who copped a month.

On outcome it's nothing because he ragdolled Parker who, of course, bounced straight back up.

On big name player for a Victorian club he would get credits for it.

Given it's a huge name, for a Victorian club I expect he gets nothing for it because that seems to be the most important aspect of the grading system.

As a WC supporter (we play Melbourne next week) and a non-Oliver owner, I would happily take a suspension.

 

[Miller is a Steele]

Harry Sheezel equal 9th on total points across all positions

 

[Drew]

Harry Sheezel equal 9th on total points across all positions

He’s a star!

 

[Nothing]

I think you’ve seen an exceptionally small sample size to think 2300 is part of the par range. Think you’ll find it’s between 2000-2250 for 99% of the active players this round.

You gotta understand Wogi par isn't regular par, it's par for being at the very pointy end.