Strategy 2023: Round 4 Trades

[Creeker]

Possibly roll with.
D Cameron to Nankervis.
Worpel to De Goey.

 

[Ironhawk]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643400409913131008

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/HawthornFC/status/1643400409913131008


Worth noting for anyone with Hawks players in midfield roles (Worpel, Day etc).

 

[spinoff]

Crikey. I was just thinking of Petrevski-Seton (for Callaghan) might be worth a crack with Weagles injury woes. Geez. Ok, it's time to clock back in to work

 

[Montyjnr]

The problem as I see it with Worpel is role.

I guess it depends how do you feel about him?

I think Hopper is probably a better option, but depends on how you feel about Worpel going forward.

I don't understand all this hate for Worpel's role - are people just looking for excuses to trade him?

He has been the 1st mid, 3rd mid & 3rd mid for Hawthorn CBAs so far this season - so he is still sitting inside their first choice midfield group each week. It's a good role for a guy that started at 309K.

 

[Vicwood]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643400409913131008

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/HawthornFC/status/1643400409913131008


Worth noting for anyone with Hawks players in midfield roles (Worpel, Day etc).

Was looking at McKenna to Day this week.

 

[Vicwood]

I don't understand all this hate for Worpel's role - are people just looking for excuses to trade him?

He has been the 1st mid, 3rd mid & 3rd mid for Hawthorn CBAs so far this season - so he is still sitting inside their first choice midfield group each week. It's a good role for a guy that started at 309K.

All it takes is one average return and the fingers start looking for the trade button.

 

[Vicwood]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643400409913131008

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/HawthornFC/status/1643400409913131008


Worth noting for anyone with Hawks players in midfield roles (Worpel, Day etc).

Would you say Day is inside MID.?

 

[Montyjnr]

All ot take is one average return and the fingers start looking for the trade.

Laird & Coniglio score under 60: "It's fine, they're elite mids that just had an off game - they will bounce back"

Worpel scores under 60: "TRADE TRADE TRADE - HE'S GONE FROM 1ST TO 3RD IN THE CBAS!!!!"

 

[chopsticks]

Any Tiges fans know much about Tylar Young's JS? Worried he's straight out whenever Tarrant/Gibcus are back.

Has done a job for us but Tarrant played in the VFL and will likely be back this week or next, and the obvious one to make way will be Young.

 

[BomberSam]

Laird & Coniglio score under 60: "It's fine, they're elite mids that just had an off game - they will bounce back"

Worpel scores under 60: "TRADE TRADE TRADE - HE'S GONE FROM 1ST TO 3RD IN THE CBAS!!!!"

Actually there's a surprising number of people trading Laird and Cogs

Also, I think with Worpel, people aren't so much concerned with his drop in CBAs but more that when playing forward he was in the goalsquare and not pushing up to the contest.

 

[Eagling]

2 unforced trades this week. This is un Professor like, but, I'm on the lookout to improve my team and onfield points.

Out - Pedlar 1 game suspension, Gulden
In - Caminiti cash gen and Oliver.

I don't like chasing points, nor trading out uninjured players. Gulden to Oliver gives me 25 points plus per week and will be a top 5 mid. I may get Gulden back later in the season in my forwards. Pedlar missing 1 game provides the downgrade to get Oliver and ride the cash that Caminiti brings.

Seems like a waste of two trades.

Gulden: You'd have to be absolutely certain that he won't be anywhere near the top 6 forwards, and this is the time to jump off.

Pedlar: One week. Still has money to make. If there were a must have rookie I could understand it, but Caminiti isn't it; and he only injects $50k.

Oliver: Buying at peak price is almost never a good idea. Sure, has a good run and could beat us up, but has been rather modest in his scoring against us in the past.

 

[Eagling]

Laird & Coniglio score under 60: "It's fine, they're elite mids that just had an off game - they will bounce back"

Worpel scores under 60: "TRADE TRADE TRADE - HE'S GONE FROM 1ST TO 3RD IN THE CBAS!!!!"

 

[Maccas marvels]

Ended up grabbing Bowes for Constable when he was named out... not sure it was the right move. Bit strapped for cash now and have to get rid of Cameron... no clue what to do. View attachment 55130

I see 12 keepers there….with the luxury of Dunkley in the mids could you swing him forward and go Cameron to LDU?
would need to make a downgrade to a rookie to have the cash but would be well worth it….

other than that you have strong depth on the field and bench …

 

[Under The Dome]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643434024667344903

View: https://twitter.com/bricemitchell/status/1643434024667344903

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643436110675169291

View: https://twitter.com/bricemitchell/status/1643436110675169291

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643435063588036608

View: https://twitter.com/bricemitchell/status/1643435063588036608

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643435060043948035

View: https://twitter.com/bricemitchell/status/1643435060043948035

 

[Montyjnr]

Actually there's a surprising number of people trading Laird and Cogs

Also, I think with Worpel, people aren't so much concerned with his drop in CBAs but more that when playing forward he was in the goalsquare and not pushing up to the contest.

I watched Swans v Hawks & Hawks v North and did not see him play out of the goal square at all.

It seemed to just be a classic half forward role when he wasn't at the stoppages.

 

[WindyHillWizard]

Laird & Coniglio score under 60: "It's fine, they're elite mids that just had an off game - they will bounce back"

Worpel scores under 60: "TRADE TRADE TRADE - HE'S GONE FROM 1ST TO 3RD IN THE CBAS!!!!"

Back yourself in man. He is likely gone for me this week to either LDU or Jelly.

 

[BomberSam]

I watched Swans v Hawks & Hawks v North and did not see him play out of the goal square at all.

It seemed to just be a classic half forward role when he wasn't at the stoppages.

Swans v Hawks, were we watching the same game?
His role seemed fine in round 2 when he went forward, the goalsquare antics seemed to start this week.

 

[Dynamo Damo]

Considering doing this to get back on track :-

View attachment 55115

Leaves me like this:-

View attachment 55116

Gets me 2 premiums in, Ziebell & Sheezel getting Def status added round 6 is very appealing/ can pair up. Move Cogs back to the fwds when I move Ziebell to defence.

Thoughts?

It’s good. Go for it.

 

[Maccas marvels]

Can someone give me a hand, very interested to know what others would do in my situation.
Now for the exciting news....believe it or not im ranked #131 Overall ......Team is CattersB2B23 if you dont believe it!
I just want to continue to hit maximum points!....looking forward to some solid advice!

View attachment 55134 View attachment 55134

Congratulations on such a brilliant start to the year!
great squad… I don’t think you need to change too much …Oliver stands out as the missing link for you..

my two trades would be:

Worpel to Buckley ( via Ginbey)

Bont up to Oliver….

The additional 20-30 points per week you gain will hold you in good stead…
Buckley averaging 91 and has a low breakeven so will grow cash at a faster rate than Worpel at present

 

[Dynamo Damo]

Ed Richards may be a better option, @$470k comes up against Richmond, Port, Freo, Hawks and them Giants.
Looks a fair run for him to makes some coin and score points?

Nah that’s not worth it. Too sideways surely.
I also have Young. In the bits of freo games I’ve seen he’s looked ok to the eye so far, but likes to position in the defensive side of the centre square corridor when ball coming out. Unless they use the corridor he gets bypassed every time. I don’t like it. But he’s not going that bad that you’d sideways him.

I think it’s justifiable to trade him to one of those 600k guys though, if you have the cash. I can’t find that cash without a bit of butchering unfortunately so he’s a hold for me.