Great post.
I think it's important to look back at past seasons and see what players scored in the first 2-3 rounds v what they ended up producing for the whole season. It's always tempting to want to put a bullet in someone who's given you two meh scores without looking at their role, team, history etc.
One of the key threads that brought me to this site was
@Rowsus statistical analysis of scoring history v scoring projections. Unless there are any fundamental changes to a player's role, injury concerns or just general decline, two or three meh scores should be seen as a reason to hold a player. You've actually gotta tell yourself "Good, now he's got those scores out of his system!".
In my case, I've got Andrew Brayshaw and his start to the season has been underwhelming. While I have thought about sidewaysing him to LDU or finding the cash to get him to Oliver, I think you gotta back in your premo choices. You pick them for 23 rounds and unless there's a fundamental change impacting their scoring ability, you ride it out on the basis that statistically speaking, he should deliver a higher proportion of better scores from here (all things being equal). For me he ticked all the boxes in the preseason and still does. The fact that Oliver has scored 135 and 136, doesn't mean he'll continue to do that. He scored 113 in the first round and is going to have other scores like that or below. They'll just come at different times.
Tinker with the mid-pricers and rookies. That's the beauty of selecting those speculative picks. Let your premos do what you bought them to do.