You're going to drop places but it's not because of Ginbey or Chandler; especially not Ginbey. 99.3% of the top 10% of coaches own Ginbey, and 97% of those fielded him. Chandler is a little less owned with 61.4% at an 86/14 field/bench split.
2,146* with Mackenzie to come. Not as high a score as the last two weeks, but it seems to stack up well versus my league opponents. Looks like being a somewhat lower scoring round.
You're going to drop places but it's not because of Ginbey or Chandler; especially not Ginbey. 99.3% of the top 10% of coaches own Ginbey, and 97% of those fielded him. Chandler is a little less owned with 61.4% at an 86/14 field/bench split.
My reference to Ginbey & Chandler was more to do with today and the potential to reach >2100 which I had achieved on 2 out of 3 rounds.
On analysis of my team, and I am sure many are similar, only 5 players reached the tone, with 12 players achieving between 75 and 100, That leaves 4 below 75. Was just really expressing my frustration with whole round.
EDIT: One team I am up against this week has 11 players who reached the ton, but a few average scores too.