SCS Supercoach Ultimate League

lappinitup

2006 AFL SuperCoach Winner
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
1,014
Likes
2,101
AFL Club
Carlton
I didn’t have enough notice to check this change. Every round I have played my team has carried over, not sure why that changed and I wasn’t on here as was travelling with family to see the change in time. Only quickly jumped on to confirm a trade (days later apologies darkie).

I had no in’s and outs the previous round, so not sure why this rule has been applied. Didn’t make a chance to the rolled forward team.
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,643
Likes
65,936
AFL Club
Essendon
I’d prefer if the rule was just it’s “no change” by default in the INs and OUTs, unless changes are otherwise made. If people forget to delete the “No Change” but have Ins/Outs, those changes are invalid.

Better outcome than blank sides in my opinion, which affects the whole comp and not just the individual side!
 

Diabolical

Leadership Group
Joined
17 Jun 2014
Messages
9,934
Likes
39,637
AFL Club
Essendon
I don’t like blank sides and think last weeks side should be the default.

I do understand though that we are supposed to write “no change” in the ins and outs to show that we are being active. The way I understand it, the blank team was only put in because this wasn’t done last week, so effectively happened two weeks running.

Maybe this should just be a warning to us all given it is the first time this has happened and YRA team is reinstated to last weeks version.
 

lappinitup

2006 AFL SuperCoach Winner
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
1,014
Likes
2,101
AFL Club
Carlton
Oh really, I haven’t seen anyone else write no change before.

I always complete my ins and outs, done it by the rules since day 1. See plenty of others have forgotten at times. Not sure I have noticed the no change comment before and never done it myself.. never had a blank team either.

If rules are consistently applied, that means I have never had no change? Fark! Incredible, will check that when I get time over next weeks.

I now know to write no change. Apologies all
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,643
Likes
65,936
AFL Club
Essendon
I don’t like blank sides and think last weeks side should be the default.

I do understand though that we are supposed to write “no change” in the ins and outs to show that we are being active. The way I understand it, the blank team was only put in because this wasn’t done last week, so effectively happened two weeks running.

Maybe this should just be a warning to us all given it is the first time this has happened and YRA team is reinstated to last weeks version.
Agree with the warning approach. Happy to enforce the rule as proposed going forward - a bit of leniency the first time seems appropriate given the drastic outcome. Would be unfortunate if YRA’s season was ruined due to this
 

lappinitup

2006 AFL SuperCoach Winner
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
1,014
Likes
2,101
AFL Club
Carlton
Thanks all. I’ll cop it either way.

Happy for me to be the example if no one else has done it before. Happy to obviously get last weeks role forward if it’s a final warning.
Ultimately, this only hurts percentage for me. I won’t win this week anyway.

Likely gives me a better mid season draft pick, might give me a better end of season draft pick. However, don’t think it will kill my end of season hopes that much. Aiming for second or third and a bit of luck in finals!
 
Joined
24 May 2020
Messages
142
Likes
568
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Blank team seems very drastic. I’ve always understood (maybe just assumed) that the previous weeks team would apply in this scenario. If we really want to apply some sort of punishment moving forward maybe the team doesn’t get the 2x captain score applied or something like that. Feel like a warning in this particular case is fair.

As an aside I find teams carrying over and having to manually list ins and out far more difficult than just naming a team from scratch each week like we do in our other Keeper League. I like the process of naming my full team and I find it helps me realise when players are out injured/dropped etc. Not lobbying for change because I know the current method was voted in but just my 2 cents
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,337
Likes
53,858
AFL Club
North Melb.
It was agreed that teams would be carried over from the previous week provided that a team was selected each week. The mechanism for knowing that this occurred was entering INs and OUTs, which could be UNCHANGED/NO CHANGE if the team was same as the previous week. Not really a burden.

I've blanked teams last year at times, and as recent as last week, for not selecting a team. Basically, the team doesn't get the convenience of a quick team entry. Inconvenience is the penalty, if we want to use that word, for neglecting that responsibility.

This is the first time a team has not been selected after it was blanked. So, that means not selected two weeks in a row. To remain blank the team clearly has not looked at their team at all. This clearly goes against expectations, but is also bewildering given the team traded out a player from their starting 22 from the previous round. That of itself necessitated a change to their team.

We can't have a zero for the round as it affects us all. So, YRA has had their team reinstated from the round 4 document. Their traded player will be covered via emergencies.

The round selection document is available many days out from the start of the round. Normally, it is Monday (often Sunday Night), giving teams at least three days to select their team. With Easter games it was available Tuesday. So, there is sufficient time and convenience to select teams, as well as Rolling Lockouts with Thursday games.

This shouldn't even be a conversation. Simply select your team for the competition each week. Not hard. Not unreasonable.
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,337
Likes
53,858
AFL Club
North Melb.
Blank team seems very drastic. I’ve always understood (maybe just assumed) that the previous weeks team would apply in this scenario. If we really want to apply some sort of punishment moving forward maybe the team doesn’t get the 2x captain score applied or something like that. Feel like a warning in this particular case is fair.

As an aside I find teams carrying over and having to manually list ins and out far more difficult than just naming a team from scratch each week like we do in our other Keeper League. I like the process of naming my full team and I find it helps me realise when players are out injured/dropped etc. Not lobbying for change because I know the current method was voted in but just my 2 cents
It wasn't blanked after selection, and/or when the round started. It was done when the round document was created in the manner of SCKL, leaving many days to select the team.
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,643
Likes
65,936
AFL Club
Essendon
It was agreed that teams would be carried over from the previous week provided that a team was selected each week. The mechanism for knowing that this occurred was entering INs and OUTs, which could be UNCHANGED/NO CHANGE if the team was same as the previous week. Not really a burden.

I've blanked teams last year at times, and as recent as last week, for not selecting a team. Basically, the team doesn't get the convenience of a quick team entry. Inconvenience is the penalty, if we want to use that word, for neglecting that responsibility.

This is the first time a team has not been selected after it was blanked. So, that means not selected two weeks in a row. To remain blank the team clearly has not looked at their team at all. This clearly goes against expectations, but is also bewildering given the team traded out a player from their starting 22 from the previous round. That of itself necessitated a change to their team.

We can't have a zero for the round as it affects us all. So, YRA has had their team reinstated from the round 4 document. Their traded player will be covered via emergencies.

The round selection document is available many days out from the start of the round. Normally, it is Monday (often Sunday Night), giving teams at least three days to select their team. With Easter games it was available Tuesday. So, there is sufficient time and convenience to select teams, as well as Rolling Lockouts with Thursday games.

This shouldn't even be a conversation. Simply select your team for the competition each week. Not hard. Not unreasonable.
It wasn't blanked after selection, and/or when the round started. It was done when the round document was created in the manner of SCKL, leaving many days to select the team.
Thanks Ken, looks like a sensible approach!

Let this be the warning to all - position is now very clear to all!
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,337
Likes
53,858
AFL Club
North Melb.
Blank team seems very drastic. I’ve always understood (maybe just assumed) that the previous weeks team would apply in this scenario. If we really want to apply some sort of punishment moving forward maybe the team doesn’t get the 2x captain score applied or something like that. Feel like a warning in this particular case is fair.

As an aside I find teams carrying over and having to manually list ins and out far more difficult than just naming a team from scratch each week like we do in our other Keeper League. I like the process of naming my full team and I find it helps me realise when players are out injured/dropped etc. Not lobbying for change because I know the current method was voted in but just my 2 cents
I agree in many ways with this. I missed putting in Shuey one week and Higgins last week for good scores.

I wipe my team from time to time for this reason. I might even do it weekly from now on.
 

Goodie's Guns

Leadership Group
Joined
21 May 2012
Messages
22,366
Likes
31,319
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Happy and agree with the outcome of the discussions above.

In an ideal world I'll find time to implement the automatic team changes sheets into UL, like I've developed for for the other KL that Jordy and Ken are in. The issue is with the slightly more complicated UL sheets, I'm not sure it will be a super easy copy over. Once I'm settled in the UK and have the odd night to kill while at home, I might set myself to implement it.

Blank team seems very drastic. I’ve always understood (maybe just assumed) that the previous weeks team would apply in this scenario. If we really want to apply some sort of punishment moving forward maybe the team doesn’t get the 2x captain score applied or something like that. Feel like a warning in this particular case is fair.

As an aside I find teams carrying over and having to manually list ins and out far more difficult than just naming a team from scratch each week like we do in our other Keeper League. I like the process of naming my full team and I find it helps me realise when players are out injured/dropped etc. Not lobbying for change because I know the current method was voted in but just my 2 cents
I'm 100 million % in agreeance with Jordy here. I really think sides should be cleared weekly. It ensures you don't miss players on your list, and I really don't think entering side takes any more time whether you're doing checks on injured/dropped players, or working through entering your 22 cleanly each week. Would be massively in favour of bringing this is, particularly if I can implement the automated team changes/no changes sheets.
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,337
Likes
53,858
AFL Club
North Melb.

TEAM SELECTION
Team selection changes have now been automated

Team selection requirements have never been easier with team selection changes now automated. Any changes to the team from the previous round will automatically show in the INs and OUTs on their team page.

Teams are required to "verify" that team selection has occurred, whether changes have been made or not, therby making team selction "Official". A check box has been added to the team page for this requirement. This will serve as a checking mechanism for teams and the league as we move into trade season.


The default setting is UNCHANGED. No change to the previous round's team simply check the "VERIFIED TEAM" box.

Teams are required to field an "Official" team each week. (So, tick that box)


BEFORE SELECTION
1681694273791.png
AFTER SELECTION
1681694369340.png
* Well done Sho. Didn't even need instructions. :)


There is a new look Round Preview/Team Selection page which accompanies the automated INs and OUTs. The same standings and predictions we've come to love with team selection integrated.

1681695669070.png

Dumb Rules we shouldn't need:
Non compliance of team selection will result in sanctions such as, but not limited to, loss of premiership points, shift/loss of draft picks and removal from the league.

:)
 

KLo30

Leadership Group
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
18,337
Likes
53,858
AFL Club
North Melb.


LEGACY ROUND

Anzac Day is a national day of remembrance in Australia and New Zealand that broadly commemorates all Australians and New Zealanders "who served and died in all wars, conflicts, and peacekeeping operations" and "the contribution and suffering of all those who have served"

During legacy round we take the time to recognise the more than 1.5 million service men and women who have served our country in all conflicts, wars and peacekeeping operations. It's also a time to remember the over 103,000 Australians who sacrificed their lives in our country's name.

SCS Ultimate League will again be honouring the ANZACs, and for the first time, doing so by wearing specially designed legacy round jumpers.

SCSUL Media will release the new jumpers over the next few hours.

1681807369470.png
 
Top